| Revision as of 23:20, 10 November 2017 view sourceAlexf (talk | contribs)Administrators192,710 editsm Reverted edits by Adviceliti (talk) to last version by Bonadea← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:47, 11 November 2017 view source GalBoot (talk | contribs)14 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == |
== I believe in you! == | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| You fell to the raging meanie that is Favonian. The surely odorous, unwashed, useless, lame man who prides himself on his virginity and his wikipedia prowess. Keep fighting the good fight! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:24, 15 August 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 17:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
| *Hello Krajoyn. I've asked you to take your edits to the talk page for discussion, but you have instead violated the 3 revert rule and offered no discussion. Please consider discussion conflicting/controversial edits in the future. -] (]) 17:30, 29 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 19:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Krajoyn, you are invited to the Teahouse! == | |||
| {| style="margin: 1em 4em;" | |||
| |- valign="top" | |||
| | ] | |||
| | <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;"> | |||
| Hi '''Krajoyn'''! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. <br />Be our guest at ]! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from experienced editors like {{noping|I JethroBT}} (]). | |||
| <div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false" style="float: left;"><span class="ui-button-text">]</span></div> | |||
| <div style="text-align:right;">We hope to see you there! | |||
| <small>Delivered by {{noping|HostBot}} on behalf of the ]</small> | |||
| <small>20:03, 29 July 2017 (UTC)</small></div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| |} | |||
| ]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> | |||
| == Edit warring at ] == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> The full report is at . Thank you, ] (]) 15:34, 30 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Resumed edit-warring == | |||
| You have chosen to resume the kind of disruptive behavior for which you were recently blocked, in particular your unwillingness to discuss your controversial changes. One more revert and you'll be blocked indefinitely. ] (]) 18:58, 2 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == August 2017 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing because it appears that you are not here to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. ] (]) 19:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Uw-nothereblock --> | |||
| {{UTRS-unblock-user|18900|Aug 02, 2017 20:09:27|closed}}--] (]) 20:09, 2 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:47, 11 November 2017
I believe in you!
You fell to the raging meanie that is Favonian. The surely odorous, unwashed, useless, lame man who prides himself on his virginity and his wikipedia prowess. Keep fighting the good fight! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charfander (talk • contribs) 17:24, 15 August 2017 (UTC)