| Revision as of 11:08, 12 October 2006 editAAAAA (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,580 edits Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Shining Path← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:25, 12 October 2006 edit undoRedSpruce (talk | contribs)12,082 edits TelepathyNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| Hello Guanaco, | Hello Guanaco, | ||
| I see that you are or represent the mediation comittee in ], and I see your "Accept". Does it mean that you accepted to be a mediator or that you decided in favor of something? Please explain.--] 11:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | I see that you are or represent the mediation comittee in ], and I see your "Accept". Does it mean that you accepted to be a mediator or that you decided in favor of something? Please explain.--] 11:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| You volunteered to mediate a dispute on this article. Since you accepted, we haven't heard from you over there. One of the editors involved has made a lot of edits today; many of them have been good, but he's starting to make some that I disagree with. My recent experience with him is that it's difficult or impossible to discuss things with him. | |||
| In other words, some actual mediation appears to be required. ] 18:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:25, 12 October 2006
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:Guanaco/Archive/Jan 2025. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
See the histories of /archive, /archive2, /archive3, and /archive4 for old conversations.
Transnistrian referendum, 2006
Thank you for accepting to mediate the Transnistrian referendum, 2006 article. I am the person who submitted the request for mediation. I am not familiar with this procedure, after the acceptance of mediation should we continue to discuss in article's talk page or in the RFM page? As you accepted to mediate, should I submit a more detailed statement in the RFM page?--MariusM 21:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- The case hasn't been assigned to a mediator yet. Before mediation can proceed, an individual member of the Committee will need to personally take it. Because of the backlog of cases and the shortage of mediators, this may take a while. —Guanaco 01:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Mediation Committee
Hiya! I noticed the note you placed on Essjay's talkpage. Is there any chance you're working on getting MedCom back up and running again? I'm a coordinator (read:clerk) for MedCab and we've got a severe case backup, so the more mediation the merrier. Oh, and if any of the MedCom folks want to do a little informal mediation, they're plenty welcome to it as far as we're concerned! Thanks! :D ~Kylu (u|t) 22:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm here for the same reason. The MedCom needs a new chair to get the ball rolling again. Would you or another active member be interested? -Will Beback 23:51, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm willing to do it. I'll ask the mediation-en-l list if anyone objects to me taking over as chair. —Guanaco 01:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Guanaco, there's a discussion about what's happening with the MedCom here in case you're interested in weighing in. The problem is that the ArbCom sometimes likes to refer cases to mediation instead of accepting them, but there's currently nothing to refer them to. Anything you and Will can do to revitalize the committee would be much appreciated. Let me know if I can help in any way. SlimVirgin 00:03, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
While we're on the subject, congrats for kicking MedCom into gear! If there's anything I can do to help out (other than join medcom, since I'm already a medcab coordinator) please don't hesitate to ask! Not that I bet you'll need help. :D ~Kylu (u|t) 03:34, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Shining Path
Hello Guanaco, I see that you are or represent the mediation comittee in Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Shining Path, and I see your "Accept". Does it mean that you accepted to be a mediator or that you decided in favor of something? Please explain.--AAAAA 11:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Telepathy
You volunteered to mediate a dispute on this article. Since you accepted, we haven't heard from you over there. One of the editors involved has made a lot of edits today; many of them have been good, but he's starting to make some that I disagree with. My recent experience with him is that it's difficult or impossible to discuss things with him.
In other words, some actual mediation appears to be required. KarlBunker 18:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)