Misplaced Pages

User talk:Journalist: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:28, 13 October 2006 editMalber (talk | contribs)6,520 edits →Username Warning: comment← Previous edit Revision as of 17:21, 13 October 2006 edit undoJournalist (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,932 edits commentNext edit →
Line 64: Line 64:
Best regards, Best regards,
] 08:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC) ] 08:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
:Youtube and Billboard are comprehensive databases about the singer. They are not fanclubs/fansites, which usually serve to promote a singer rather than list the good and the bad about them. That's why I keep including them. Also, youtube has become quite a popular source/refernce site. Billboard has been one from the start. ] (] • ]) 17:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:21, 13 October 2006

Template:Titled-click Template:Titled-click Template:Titled-click Template:Titled-click Template:Titled-click
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
Talk archives

I II III IV V
VI VII VIII IX X
XI XII XIII XIV

Click here to post a new message

RfB With A Smile :)

      

Username Warning

Per WP:USERNAME and WP:SIG, obfuscation of your actual username in signatures is discouraged. An admin who hides behind a nickname lacks accountability; it would be difficult to find you on the administrator's list. Please change it soon or request WP:CHU.

—Malber (talk • contribs) 02:56, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

My signature is fine the way it is. Thanks and happy editing! Orane (talk • cont.) 06:40, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Actually, WP:SIG says, "Signatures that obscure your account name to the casual reader may be seen as disruptive." WP:USERNAME says, "A signature should not be misleading." I don't see how "Orane" relates to "Journalist." IMO, an admin should be setting an example, not breaking the rules. I've noticed that you've blocked the username User:Orane out of process and without discussion. I've brought this to the attention of other admins at WP:AN. —Malber (talk • contribs) 13:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Celinecruft

Hello Orane,

You keep removing celinedionweb but at the same time, you don't remove sites as YouTube or else. They are unofficial sites as well. So either you remove all unofficial sites, either you display them. But if you keep some and remove others without much consideration, I don't think it is fair. celinedionweb bring as much info as YouTube or else.

Best regards, 83.214.216.95 08:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Youtube and Billboard are comprehensive databases about the singer. They are not fanclubs/fansites, which usually serve to promote a singer rather than list the good and the bad about them. That's why I keep including them. Also, youtube has become quite a popular source/refernce site. Billboard has been one from the start. Orane (talk • cont.) 17:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)