| Revision as of 09:59, 1 December 2017 editMar4d (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers84,737 edits re← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:37, 1 December 2017 edit undoKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,684 edits →ARBIPA sanctions reminder: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| : {{ping|Ngrewal1}} Thank you, it means a lot. All the best and kind regards, ''']''' (]) 09:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC) | : {{ping|Ngrewal1}} Thank you, it means a lot. All the best and kind regards, ''']''' (]) 09:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == ARBIPA sanctions reminder == | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The ] has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ], ], and ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| : Mar4d, you know the applicable sanctions. In , you have taken responsibility for the edits of an editor that has been banned and blocked for multiple NPOV violations, and hacked into {{U|Faizan}}'s account in March 2017 and pretended to be him (according to Faizan). I hope you have examined all this content careflly and ensured that it is reliably sourced and satisfies NPOV. From now on, whatever problems are found with them will be attributed to you. I hope you know what you are doing. -- ] (]) 12:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:37, 1 December 2017
| This is Mar4d's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25Auto-archiving period: 28 days  |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 | Mar4d is busy and is going to be on Misplaced Pages in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
|
.jpeg){kind=small}
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
List of federal agencies of Pakistan
If you're aware where the departments under the "Other" category belong, can you place them in the appropriate ministries? I did it as much as I could find. Thanks. --110.93.236.75 (talk) 02:44, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Your recent reverts on Rajput clans
Dear, You made an edit on the said article and modified the sourced contents. Have you gone through the given sources before making an attempt to edit. Just do it and also refer the talk page of the said article where I have given a line from from the source. For your easy reference I have mentioned the related page no. too. Thanks.--MahenSingha (Talk)
Yo
Yo man could you please go over to the Al-khalid tank and talk page and clear up all the confusion there.
help required
sir reference to
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fakhar_Abbas
i am contacting you to help to revive this article please note the person has done a lot in different fields but he is quite media shy and don't want to be named for his achievements regarding the complaints about references here are few articles within Misplaced Pages https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?search=%22fakhar-i-abbas%22&title=Special:Search&go=Go&searchToken=5wg4hahw6m7r2haav0bu1r6yi
https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/Fakhar_Abbas.html
and also here are https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMGLg1Ja_Qw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFIrA7TULxA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLfhCosAPbw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smS2r_WYQRU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WuyUnJX0QU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spklHufXs5Y
https://www.google.com.pk/search?q=fakhar+abbas+bioresource+research+centre&oq=fakhar+abbas+bioresource+research+centre&aqs=chrome..69i57.11151j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
i can provide more if required please help restoring this page or let me know what else they require
Shia Islam in Pakistan
Kindly stop editing the page with adding weak references and advocating Sunni sect. All the edits are referenced and reliable in regards to Jinnah being Shia. http://www.thefridaytimes.com/24122010/page27.shtml https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lv_ixjgoyFA, words of your very own defense minister. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-nxrLtbT0Y, Sunni Allama Tahir ul Qadri — Preceding unsigned comment added by SyedNaqvi1512 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- @SyedNaqvi1512: The sectarian beliefs of Jinnah are widely debated, and something that does not have uniform consensus. See the main article of Muhammad Ali Jinnah. There are scholars of course who say that he lived as a Shia his whole life. There are then scholars who say that he moved closer to Sunni beliefs by the end of his life, or even accepted them. And then there are the majority of scholars who accept that he personally had no strong convictions about his sect and only self-identified as a Muslim. So the matter is not so black and white as you see. While I don't see any issue with him being listed on List of Pakistani Shia Muslims, given that he had a Shia background, I would be careful with singling him out for any particular sect affiliation. We need to consult and consider a broad spectrum of sources. Best, Mar4d (talk) 06:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for invitation of joining WP:Pakistan. I,m also working on Articles relating to Pakistan. ALIwaince 09:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
1947 genocide of Muslims in Jammu needs a seperate article
I think we need a seperate article named massacre of Muslims in Jammu 1947 as a smaller event in Mirpur has its own even though it much smaller. Plus the number of dead ranges from 20k to 237k not 100k which the Indians like to brandish. Not sure if your bothered but I have started a discussion about the huge amounts of diverting information unrelated to this event and one user saffron in the talk page is evidence of the religous agenda behind adding unrelated massacres to dilute the jammu massacres please join discussion. There is seperate articles for mirpur yet people want to add huge swathes of texts to justify the genocide in Jammu. 2A02:C7D:151D:D100:7871:7BC2:3DB8:7A1C (talk) 08:54, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Possibly also one for the hidden Hyderabad genocide of Muslims in 1948 since the Indians have tried so hard to suppress such news its our duty to expose them bro. 2A02:C7D:151D:D100:7871:7BC2:3DB8:7A1C (talk) 14:14, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
WikiCup 2018
So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
A bit of help
Hi I just wanted to ask you if you would kindly review my edits on 1947 Mirpur massacre some editors are trying to remove sourced edits which provide a broader picture of events that led to the Mirpur events. 2A02:C7D:151D:D100:D9D2:14B8:A868:91FD (talk) 11:37, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Notice
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Moona Sehgal (talk) 23:12, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| I admire the way you handle Pakistan-related 'larger big picture' issues on Misplaced Pages Discussion Forums. It must be stressful. Hang in there, you are a soldier for the rest of us. Ngrewal1 (talk) 04:28, 30 November 2017 (UTC) |
- @Ngrewal1: Thank you, it means a lot. All the best and kind regards, Mar4d (talk) 09:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
ARBIPA sanctions reminder
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.- Mar4d, you know the applicable sanctions. In this edit, you have taken responsibility for the edits of an editor that has been banned and blocked for multiple NPOV violations, and hacked into Faizan's account in March 2017 and pretended to be him (according to Faizan). I hope you have examined all this content careflly and ensured that it is reliably sourced and satisfies NPOV. From now on, whatever problems are found with them will be attributed to you. I hope you know what you are doing. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)