Revision as of 20:20, 10 December 2017 editWakari07 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,825 edits →Disruptive editing warning: re and close for me← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:36, 10 December 2017 edit undoThe Kip (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,658 edits →Disruptive editing warningNext edit → | ||
Line 191: | Line 191: | ||
] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you ] Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. Myself, ], (a bunch of numbers and letters), and ] have all independently reverted your edit. This counts as a four to one consensus that the news about how much TV Trump watches is not newsworthy. If you revert the page again, your edit will be construed as vandalism and you will be reported to an administrator. The burden of proof lies with the accuser, and in your initial accusation that this is a newsworthy event you have provided no proof and instead asked those who dispute the newsworthiness to prove it as not newsworthy (this is a ]).] (]) 20:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC)<!-- Template:uw-generic4 --> | ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you ] Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. Myself, ], (a bunch of numbers and letters), and ] have all independently reverted your edit. This counts as a four to one consensus that the news about how much TV Trump watches is not newsworthy. If you revert the page again, your edit will be construed as vandalism and you will be reported to an administrator. The burden of proof lies with the accuser, and in your initial accusation that this is a newsworthy event you have provided no proof and instead asked those who dispute the newsworthiness to prove it as not newsworthy (this is a ]).] (]) 20:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC)<!-- Template:uw-generic4 --> | ||
:Acknowledged. ] (]) 20:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Still you sound to me like a team of lawyers in Iran. ] (]) 20:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC) | :Acknowledged. ] (]) 20:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Still you sound to me like a team of lawyers in Iran. ] (]) 20:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
Please stop using personal insults and callouts such as "I think User:Kiteinthewind thinks i'm a dork," "I dare User:The Kip to point me to somewhere," or "You sound like a team of lawyers in Iran." Continued callouts and/or insults will be regarded as a violation of ] and will be dealt with accordingly. ] (]) 20:36, 10 December 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:36, 10 December 2017
Archives |
/My Public Favourites /My workspace
Welcoming your input
Simple definition articles
Hello Wakari07! I've noticed that some of the articles you've created recently consist of little more than word definitions. For example Bahiraṅga and Antaraṅga. Per WP:NOT: "Misplaced Pages is not a dictionary, or a usage or jargon guide." If these articles can't be expanded with encyclopedic content, they should be moved to Wiktionary instead, which is designed specifically for word definition articles. Let me know if you have any questions about this. Cheers. Kaldari (talk) 06:04, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- They may look like stubs and simple definition articles, but they are concepts of certain philosophies. A student (of Yoga or a dravidian philosophy/religion or any consciousness science) may have good use for this reference at least as disambiguations or, at the very least, as redirects . While they may look as "little more than definitions" now and to the layman, i insist with the little argument i have, to note these (related) concept pairs: Bahiraṅga-Antaraṅga and Sabīja-Nirbīja as reference points rather than just as words. Wakari07 (talk) 14:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- (copy to article's talk pages) Wakari07 (talk) 14:08, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe the subject at the core of the two pairs mentioned, is Cetanā. Wakari07 (talk) 16:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- Will try to plant a bīja of this in WP:WikiProject Yoga one of these days. Oh my, I forgot: Thanks for your reply. Wakari07 (talk) 16:29, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe the subject at the core of the two pairs mentioned, is Cetanā. Wakari07 (talk) 16:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I would encourage you to group these words under higher concepts that can be developed into full encyclopedia articles. Alternately, you can use the {{Wiktionary redirect}} template to create a soft redirect to Wiktionary. Misplaced Pages articles generally don't include sections like "Antonym", "Transliterations", or "Etymology", as they are supposed to be about broad concepts, not individual words (although there are exceptions). These sort of entries are perfectly suited to Wiktionary though. Kaldari (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks again for the encouragement. I think the unified login works now, that helps ;) Wakari07 (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- (copy to article's talk pages) Wakari07 (talk) 14:08, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Obrigkeitsstaat.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page
- Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages! Sionk (talk) 23:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Adventures of Alix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. Thanks for the message. Wakari07 (talk) 15:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Ways to improve Louis-Pierre Dillais
Hi, I'm Theopolisme. Wakari07, thanks for creating Louis-Pierre Dillais!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi there, thanks for the new article -- it seems to use confusing tenses/wording.. you may want to take a quick look. Thanks! Theopolisme 22:17, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Louis-Pierre Dillais, Wakari07!
Misplaced Pages editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please see WP:CITE to learn more about the correct formatting of footnotes avoiding the display of bare ULS. Thanks.
To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
- Thank you for your suggestion. Wakari07 (talk) 16:42, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis-Pierre Dillais, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Knack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:27, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! Fixed. Wakari07 (talk) 16:39, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Nuclear power by country
Please see my proposal to upmerge Category:Nuclear power by country and subcategories (4) to Category:Nuclear energy by country Hugo999 (talk) 12:24, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Living Under Drones (academic study) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Living Under Drones (academic study) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Living Under Drones (academic study) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Obrigkeitsstaat concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Obrigkeitsstaat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Your draft article, Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Obrigkeitsstaat
Hello Wakari07. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Obrigkeitsstaat".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Obrigkeitsstaat}}
, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of NIRAS (disambiguation)
A tag has been placed on NIRAS (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates two or fewer extant Misplaced Pages pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
- disambiguates no (zero) extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. PamD 08:37, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Louis-Pierre Dillais for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louis-Pierre Dillais is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Louis-Pierre Dillais until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 20:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Whaling by japanese
the appropriate category for Japanese whaling would be "scandals and opinions". Therefore, it may be inappropriate for the news. Second possible match is "environment and ecology". Tech or science news should describe results or at least firm progress (experimental platform launch, for example), not the claims on progress commonly known to be false in case of Japanese whaling.
- Did put it in "Environment and ecology" as per your suggestion. Wakari07 (talk) 13:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Wakari07. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
December 6, 2017 edits on the current events portal page
Please familiarize yourself with the posting guidelines before you make any further edits on the page as your recent edits (like this and this one) shows your profound ignorance of them. Wingwraith (talk) 02:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- What guidelines exactly do you mean? Wakari07 (talk) 03:00, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- The guidelines that are located above the edit box when you edit the page. Also do not accompany your recent edit with this kind of comment again, it is false, idiotic and will attract administrative attention if you fail to cease and desist from making them. Wingwraith (talk) 03:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- It's still up on your accusation to substantiate why the illegal occupation of East Jerusalem would have any reason other than Land of Israel. I see none.~You~ are destroying information from the Misplaced Pages. Wakari07 (talk) 03:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- That's a separate issue from your interpretation of what Netanyahu was referring to when he described the announcement as a "historic landmark." Wingwraith (talk) 03:42, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- I made my point. Where is the plan?Wakari07 (talk) 03:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- That's a separate issue from your interpretation of what Netanyahu was referring to when he described the announcement as a "historic landmark." Wingwraith (talk) 03:42, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- It's still up on your accusation to substantiate why the illegal occupation of East Jerusalem would have any reason other than Land of Israel. I see none.~You~ are destroying information from the Misplaced Pages. Wakari07 (talk) 03:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- The guidelines that are located above the edit box when you edit the page. Also do not accompany your recent edit with this kind of comment again, it is false, idiotic and will attract administrative attention if you fail to cease and desist from making them. Wingwraith (talk) 03:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Wingwraith (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- lol what's your point again? 04:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Swedish Doctors for Human Rights
For Swedish Doctors for Human Rights in Portal:Current events/2017 December 8 see Portal talk:Current events/2017 December 8. X1\ (talk) 22:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC) copyWakari07 (talk) 22:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
December 8, 2017 edits on the current events portal page
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Wingwraith (talk) 22:54, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Noted. Wakari07 (talk) 22:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Portal:Current_events/2017_December_9&diff=814732224&oldid=814722465 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. --2600:8800:FF0E:1200:C57:B925:112F:96D (talk) 16:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- The version as it stands now is OK for me. For a discussion on that, I refer you to the discussion proposal below. Thank you. Are you an admin? Wakari07 (talk) 16:24, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
December 9, 2017 edits on the current events portal page
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Murchison-Eye (talk) 10:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not engaged in a dispute since no argument was presented. Wakari07 (talk) 10:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
December 10 edits on the December 9, 2017 current events portal page
- Significance, notability, metrics ... ?
- Consensus decision-making criteria:
Number of adherents to Points of View for and against publishing the Vanity snippet.
- For: me Wakari07 (talk) 11:55, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Against: 4
Other criteria? Someone? Sources? Wakari07 (talk) 12:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- I think four entities manage to fake a question mark. Wakari07 (talk) 12:38, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Besides, User:PlanetDeadwing opines that my use of tenses would not be worth the bother of a comment. Wakari07 (talk) 13:06, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
~I think User:Kiteinthewind thinks i'm a dork. Wakari07 (talk) 19:50, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
I dare User:The Kip to point me to somewhere. Wakari07 (talk) 19:52, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
And then the "ip storm". Wakari07 (talk) 19:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oh wait, there is also the explicit so-called "pass-gas" argument. Wakari07 (talk) 20:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Here Wakari07 (talk) 20:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Portal:Current events/2017 December 9. Kiteinthewind 19:38, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did at Portal:Current events/2017 December 9, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been asked, repeatedly, to stop including that news item. You have gone against the consensus of the community, on this issue, more than once. A report has been filed as a result. Stop. Kiteinthewind 19:45, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Where is that report filed? Wakari07 (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Am I allowed a public process? Wakari07 (talk) 19:58, 10 December 2017 (UTC) What's the plan? Wakari07 (talk) 20:00, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Disruptive editing warning
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at Portal:Current events/2017 December 9. Myself, GWA88, (a bunch of numbers and letters), and Kiteinthewind have all independently reverted your edit. This counts as a four to one consensus that the news about how much TV Trump watches is not newsworthy. If you revert the page again, your edit will be construed as vandalism and you will be reported to an administrator. The burden of proof lies with the accuser, and in your initial accusation that this is a newsworthy event you have provided no proof and instead asked those who dispute the newsworthiness to prove it as not newsworthy (this is a logical fallacy).The Kip (talk) 20:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Acknowledged. Wakari07 (talk) 20:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Still you sound to me like a team of lawyers in Iran. Wakari07 (talk) 20:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop using personal insults and callouts such as "I think User:Kiteinthewind thinks i'm a dork," "I dare User:The Kip to point me to somewhere," or "You sound like a team of lawyers in Iran." Continued callouts and/or insults will be regarded as a violation of Misplaced Pages's civility policy and will be dealt with accordingly. The Kip (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2017 (UTC)