| Revision as of 06:52, 19 December 2017 editElektricity (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users545 edits →I have started the ANI thread we agreed on: new sectionTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:52, 19 December 2017 edit undoRaymond3023 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,038 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] (]) 19:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC) | If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] (]) 19:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| :The cited book has been misrepresented, and the term has no existence in this context. There is no other alternative to this misrepresentation other than replacing it with what has been easily sourced. ] (]) 00:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC) | :The cited book has been misrepresented, and the term has no existence in this context. There is no other alternative to this misrepresentation other than replacing it with what has been easily sourced. ] (]) 00:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == I have started the ANI thread we agreed on == | |||
| '''<code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>]:]<nowiki>}} ~~~~</nowiki></code>''' | |||
Revision as of 06:52, 19 December 2017
Welcome!
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, Raymond3023! Thank you for your contributions. I am WereSpielChequers and I have been editing Misplaced Pages for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Misplaced Pages:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! ϢereSpielChequers 18:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Unblocked
Following your successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, your block has been lifted.
Let me be the first to welcome you back, and wish you happy editing.
For the Arbitration Committee, GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:14, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Faith healing. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. - MrX 11:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Unblocked
You have been unblocked following a successful appeal to the arbitration committee. Opabinia regalis (talk) 07:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Unreliable?
How do you decide a source is unreliable? What research did you do about ANHAD before undoing the edits? Wikiercomer (talk) 17:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- The website that you are using is unreliable because per WP:RS, your source contradicts, "Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts, or with no editorial oversight. Such sources include websites and publications expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions." Therefore it is unreliable. And the official website link that you changed to, it is not working. I have removed the current official link (anhadin.net) too now, because it is not working as well. Raymond3023 (talk) 03:33, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Racism
Please review WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss it on the article talk page, not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring. During the discussion, the article remains in the status quo ante.
In addition, please do not edit against WP:CONSENSUS. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:38, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Some advice
Hello Raymond3023. It is no big deal, but I wanted to mention that your edit to Misplaced Pages talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics asking for input in a discussion elsewhere about Caste, was not very neutral. If asking for input in this manner, it is best to be neutral, because otherwise one increases the risks of being seen as violating the WP:CANVASSING guideline. I recommend being more careful with such notifications in future. MPS1992 (talk) 22:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- The cited book has been misrepresented, and the term has no existence in this context. There is no other alternative to this misrepresentation other than replacing it with what has been easily sourced. Raymond3023 (talk) 00:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC)