Misplaced Pages

Talk:Celebrant (Australia): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:53, 17 November 2016 editInternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Pending changes reviewers5,381,790 edits Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2.7.1)← Previous edit Revision as of 03:39, 20 December 2017 edit undoKb.au (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,794 edits importanceTag: 2017 wikitext editorNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WP Australia|class=B}} {{WP Australia|class=B|importance=low}}
{{WP Sociology|class=B|importance=low}} {{WP Sociology|class=B|importance=low}}



Revision as of 03:39, 20 December 2017

WikiProject iconAustralia B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconCelebrant (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
WikiProject iconSociology B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No merge

There is no reason at all to merge this with a larger entry that lists various common Euro-American wedding participants. If anything such an entry should link to this as the main entry.PelleSmith (talk) 14:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree. The Australian Civil Celebrant is genuinely unique and other Western Countries are still struggling to absorb the complex of concepts. (Citizen-Gladiator) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citizen-Gladiator (talkcontribs) 19:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

..and New Zealand

This term, celebrant is also used in New Zealand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Galaxyporpoise (talkcontribs) 06:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC) -- I intend to put in a section in on New Zealand as soon as I can find a reliable source. (Citizen-Gladiator) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citizen-Gladiator (talkcontribs) 19:50, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Celebrant (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Categories: