| Revision as of 19:26, 3 December 2017 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,134,948 edits →ArbCom 2017 election voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:45, 26 December 2017 edit undoTrxi (talk | contribs)382 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| I did not supply any of the original text - I simply moved it from the over-crowded ] page. I obviously didn't bother checking it for copyright violation, but I suggest the people to pester about the copyright problem should be the ones who created the original text, i.e. not me. ] (]) 12:46, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | I did not supply any of the original text - I simply moved it from the over-crowded ] page. I obviously didn't bother checking it for copyright violation, but I suggest the people to pester about the copyright problem should be the ones who created the original text, i.e. not me. ] (]) 12:46, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691988767 --> | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Trxi. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/6&oldid=750545473 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Trxi. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/11&oldid=813413898 --> | |||
Revision as of 09:45, 26 December 2017
thank you for this input
this is Pernambuco, if you see the History for Classical homeopathy you can see that I am one of the contributors, and I want to say how much I appreciate the list that you put into Talk, it is a good step to work from Pernambuco 02:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Don't bother contacting me about any of the Umhlanga/Incwala text
I did not supply any of the original text - I simply moved it from the over-crowded Swaziland page. I obviously didn't bother checking it for copyright violation, but I suggest the people to pester about the copyright problem should be the ones who created the original text, i.e. not me. Trxi (talk) 12:46, 27 August 2009 (UTC)