| Revision as of 19:54, 19 January 2018 editRusf10 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,121 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:55, 19 January 2018 edit undoC. W. Gilmore (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,807 edits →George Street Co-opNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Keep''' A search reveals plenty of good sources. The nomination is false. ] (]) 18:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' A search reveals plenty of good sources. The nomination is false. ] (]) 18:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ::Your assessment of the sources is false. There are very few sources that have more than a passing mention.--] (]) 19:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC) | ::Your assessment of the sources is false. There are very few sources that have more than a passing mention.--] (]) 19:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :::FYI, - Added another source and working on a few more from the local NJ news outlets. ] (]) 19:55, 19 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep''' -Notable and reliably sourced, even if it is currently a stub, that is no reason for deletion. ] (]) 18:50, 19 January 2018 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' -Notable and reliably sourced, even if it is currently a stub, that is no reason for deletion. ] (]) 18:50, 19 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:55, 19 January 2018
George Street Co-op
- George Street Co-op (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, fails WP:ORG and a search reveals very few sources, not enough to establish notability. Rusf10 (talk) 07:12, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. 09:33, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. 09:34, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. 09:35, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep A search reveals plenty of good sources. The nomination is false. Andrew D. (talk) 18:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Your assessment of the sources is false. There are very few sources that have more than a passing mention.--Rusf10 (talk) 19:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- FYI, - Added another source and working on a few more from the local NJ news outlets. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 19:55, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Your assessment of the sources is false. There are very few sources that have more than a passing mention.--Rusf10 (talk) 19:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep -Notable and reliably sourced, even if it is currently a stub, that is no reason for deletion. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 18:50, 19 January 2018 (UTC)