Misplaced Pages

Dostoevsky and Parricide: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:06, 15 October 2006 editElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,958 edits tagging as uncategorized using AWB← Previous edit Revision as of 01:32, 20 October 2006 edit undoDeconcoder (talk | contribs)7 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{uncat|October 2006}}{{wikify|October 2006}} {Category:Sigmund Freud}{{uncat|October 2006}}{{wikify|October 2006}}
A 1928 article that argues that the greatest works of world literature all concern parricide: ], ], and ]. Freud claims that Dostoevsky's epilepsy was a function of guilt he bore at having wished for the death of his tyrannical father who was purportedly murdered by his own serfs. Ultimately, Freud claims that Dostoevsky's works are diminished by their weak Christian endings. A 1928 article that argues that the greatest works of world literature all concern parricide: ], ], and ]. Freud claims that Dostoevsky's epilepsy was a function of guilt he bore at having wished for the death of his tyrannical father who was purportedly murdered by his own serfs. Ultimately, Freud claims that Dostoevsky's works are diminished by their weak Christian endings.



Revision as of 01:32, 20 October 2006

{Category:Sigmund Freud}

This article has not been added to any content categories. Please help out by adding categories to it so that it can be listed with similar articles.
Template:Wikify is deprecated. Please use a more specific cleanup template as listed in the documentation.

A 1928 article that argues that the greatest works of world literature all concern parricide: Oedipus Rex, Hamlet, and The Brothers Karamazov. Freud claims that Dostoevsky's epilepsy was a function of guilt he bore at having wished for the death of his tyrannical father who was purportedly murdered by his own serfs. Ultimately, Freud claims that Dostoevsky's works are diminished by their weak Christian endings.

(Freud's first extensive writing about parricide was in Totem and Taboo (1911), widely seen as his watershed work away from clinically oriented subject matter to philosophy. In it, parricide is the great crime at the base of all social evolution. (Freud drew extensively on Frazier's The Golden Bough.)