Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jaakko Sivonen: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:48, 20 October 2006 editJaakko Sivonen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,625 edits Image← Previous edit Revision as of 12:46, 20 October 2006 edit undoGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,661 edits please stick to guidelinesNext edit →
Line 43: Line 43:
Sinä kun näistä asioista olet sotvannut niin katso mitä ]ssa on.--] (]) 11:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC) Sinä kun näistä asioista olet sotvannut niin katso mitä ]ssa on.--] (]) 11:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
:Kiitos, poistin kuvan. --] 11:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC) :Kiitos, poistin kuvan. --] 11:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
::It is not considered polite to use foreign languages in this Anglophone project. Please translate or you will be reported. --<font color="FC4339">]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">]</font></sup> 12:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

Jaakko, I see that you engage in tendentious editing. Please reconsider. This is particularly disturbing. Could you explain why you insist on adding ] to ], when it is already part of ]? It is easy to see that the latter category is part of the former; and ] deprecates double categorization. As for the rest of your edits, they are in violation of ]. There have been many discussions on naming issues. You may want to check ] to get some idea of it. The consensus is to use, in historical contexts, those names that were official at the period. For instance, we don't say that ] lived in ]. To talk about the ] during WWII is also misleading. If the castle was built by the Swedes and was used by the Swedish government, its name should be rendered in Swedish. Another option is to use Russian, because the castle has been part of Russia during the last three centuries. I don't see any basis for forcing Misplaced Pages to prefer Finnish spellings there. If you don't reconsider you activities, more blocks may ensue. Take care, <font color="FC4339">]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">]</font></sup> 12:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:46, 20 October 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Jaakko Sivonen, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  —A.S. Damick 00:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: 5.5 % speak Swedish in Finland

No you have understood the intention of my reverts quite wrong. I reverted them because when you present statistical data you, in a mathematical sence and therefor as a rule of statistics, have to keep all data at the same precision in case it is data that eliminates the other data. You can't eg. say. 92,76 % of the people in some group wear a hat and 9% don't.

So if you want to change 6% to 5,5 you also have to change 92% to the correct value at the precision of one decimal.

Also when it comes to such large figures it is usually customary to keep to a zero decimal precision, but this is neither what i primarily objected to.

Have a nice day

Gillis 15:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)


Finnish People

Misplaced Pages is meant to be a neutral encyclopedia. Based on your history of edits, you seem to use it for a personal crusade against everything Swedish. You have to conform to NPOV and stop inserting bold claims without sources. If you disagree with what other people write, that's fine. In that case, use the talk page to argue your case and use sources to back up the claims you make. To accuse others of vandalism, as you did to Epf, just because you don't agree with their views is not in accordance with Misplaced Pages policies. JdeJ 11:58, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Epf was trying to bring in his own opinions of Finnish origin, claiming that we are not the original people of Finland. I would say that that is non-NPOV and as such, vandalism. --Jaakko Sivonen 15:10, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

You have taken to an unpleasant tactic of accusing anyone who disagrees with you of vandalism. You accused Epf when he disagreed with you. What he in fact did was to change a paragraph lacking any sources to another one that was backed up with sources. Regardless of whether you disagree with him or not, you cannot possibly call that vandalism. In the past few days, you have issued warnings of vandalism to a number of users. What these users have done is to restore the information box at Finnish people to the template used in every other article on different peoples. Let me be very clear here, editing out your own edits so that the information box looks as it previously did is not vandalism. Please try to engage in discussions in a constructive way in the future and argue for your views on the talk pages. JdeJ 08:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Final warning

One more personal attack, or an abusive edit summary will result in a report which will likely lead to a block. Please reconsider your attitude. --Irpen 17:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't have to call people idiots if they would read the arguments, but no: you just reverted without any counter-argument and without any knowledge of Finnish history. That is called vandalism and consider this your final warning. --Jaakko Sivonen 17:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

I have blocked you for persistant incivility. See:--MONGO 20:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaakko Sivonen (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I will refrain from personal attacks

Decline reason:

All things considered, some would call 31 hours lenient. You need to know that we're serious about these things. Please do continue to contribute, but please bear in mind civility while you do. Thanks for your patience, in the meantime. -- Luna Santin 06:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Image

Sinä kun näistä asioista olet sotvannut niin katso mitä Russophobiassa on.--Pudeo (Talk) 11:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Kiitos, poistin kuvan. --Jaakko Sivonen 11:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
It is not considered polite to use foreign languages in this Anglophone project. Please translate or you will be reported. --Ghirla 12:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

WP:TE

Jaakko, I see that you engage in tendentious editing. Please reconsider. This edit is particularly disturbing. Could you explain why you insist on adding Vyborg Castle to Category:History of Finland, when it is already part of Category:Medieval Finland? It is easy to see that the latter category is part of the former; and WP:CAT deprecates double categorization. As for the rest of your edits, they are in violation of WP:NC. There have been many discussions on naming issues. You may want to check Talk:Gdansk/Vote to get some idea of it. The consensus is to use, in historical contexts, those names that were official at the period. For instance, we don't say that Kant lived in Kaliningrad. To talk about the Siege of Saint Petersburg during WWII is also misleading. If the castle was built by the Swedes and was used by the Swedish government, its name should be rendered in Swedish. Another option is to use Russian, because the castle has been part of Russia during the last three centuries. I don't see any basis for forcing Misplaced Pages to prefer Finnish spellings there. If you don't reconsider you activities, more blocks may ensue. Take care, Ghirla 12:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)