| Revision as of 18:00, 20 October 2006 editAP.BOT (talk | contribs)41,147 editsm BOT - subst:'ing warning messages← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:54, 20 October 2006 edit undoTankred (talk | contribs)7,836 edits →Blocked 48 hours: explanation why it is not a good idea to unblock himNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| B: I wrote on my userpage on ''sept 5''. that I do mainly anonim edits. Then he accused me of sockpuppetry on'' oct. 10'' for using IPs. pfff I was clearly stated it on my talkpage. My roomate was blocked indef. Thanks to ''Tankred'' he does not want to participate in this wikipedia anymore. --] 14:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC)}} | B: I wrote on my userpage on ''sept 5''. that I do mainly anonim edits. Then he accused me of sockpuppetry on'' oct. 10'' for using IPs. pfff I was clearly stated it on my talkpage. My roomate was blocked indef. Thanks to ''Tankred'' he does not want to participate in this wikipedia anymore. --] 14:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC)}} | ||
| Since I believe that VinceB's arguments are a bit misleading and his accusations against me unsubstantiated, I must briefly comment on them. As for his sockpuppetry confirmed by ChceckUser, a biref overview of the case can be found . As for the previous vandalism, all VinceB's edits and the warning templates that he removed from his talk page can be traced back. Just to give you a handful of examples, he has blanked whole paragraphs, changed geographic names into their Hungarian version (hiding all the official non-Hungarian names), and made subtle nasty changes of numerical data. After he was warned, he just pasted the same warning templates to the talk pages of ] and me. He has also made failed attempts to use the formal procedures against at least three different users who disagreed with his disruptive edits (reporting false incidents, vandalism, personal attacks, and initiating investigation or arbitration). All those attempts failed and VinceB has been blocked by two previously uninvolved admins for sockpuppetry and edit warring. As for the alleged "fake source", this accusation by VinceB's sockpuppet (and now repeated by the puppetmaster himself) is non sense and I do not understand what he means by it. He does not like the descripion of ] as a nationalist party, but this description is now supported by four references to the leading academic journals and BBC. Neither of them is "fake" and this fact can be easily proven. Please, do not unblock VinceB. Normal editors of the articles about Central Europe need some rest. ] 18:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:54, 20 October 2006
This page is rubber frendly.
Blocked 48 hours
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Misplaced Pages. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Misplaced Pages are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires.
This block is primarily for edit warring after a previous block and repeated warnings. There is an open debate about blanking such notices from one's user talk page, so I do not name these blankings as a reason for blocking. However, in more general terms, that sort of blanking doesn't really gain you anything - I still read the posts through the page history and it didn't look good when I searched for mitigating factors that might shorten or negate the block.
I hope in the future you'll use your knowledge of Hungarian history to improve pages - the English language edition of Misplaced Pages could certainly use such help. Unfortunately it doesn't aid the project or English-only readers to change names into versions that rarely get used in this language. Respectfully, Durova 21:52, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
VinceB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I used talk pages wich were ignored by User:Tankred. He deliberately uses very emotional words and phrases wich (in enwiki) istantly creates a negative image about me, without knowing the ongoing situation between us. And makes a false image about me and abt the backround of my contribs (for ex: well known vandal). I already sent him warning templates to stop calling me a vandal. I'm not able to discuss with him, because he's not talking with me, I always tried to find a solution. Check anywhere. He clearly stated hatred against me several times, and he wants to kick me out of english wikipedia to defend his fakes and lies. (I proved that they are fakes and lies.) (He also faked a source) Not negotiating, not talking just attacking. His first edit on my discussion page was similar. My contribs are all were sourced, I wrote it on his discussion page also, and in the articles (as refs). Deleting them is vandalism. Check. B: I wrote on my userpage on sept 5. that I do mainly anonim edits. Then he accused me of sockpuppetry on oct. 10 for using IPs. pfff I was clearly stated it on my talkpage. My roomate was blocked indef. Thanks to Tankred he does not want to participate in this wikipedia anymore. --VinceB 14:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I used talk pages wich were '''ignored''' by ]. He deliberately uses very emotional words and phrases wich (in enwiki) istantly creates a negative image about me, without knowing the ongoing situation between us. And makes a false image about me and abt the backround of my contribs (for ex: ''well known vandal''). I already sent him warning templates to stop calling me a vandal. I'm not able to discuss with him, because he's not talking with me, I always tried to find a solution. Check anywhere. He clearly stated hatred against me several times, and he wants to kick me out of english wikipedia to defend his fakes and lies. (I proved that they are fakes and lies.) (He also faked a source) Not negotiating, not talking just attacking. His first edit on my discussion page was similar. My contribs are all were sourced, I wrote it on his discussion page also, and in the articles (as refs). Deleting them is vandalism. Check. B: I wrote on my userpage on ''sept 5''. that I do mainly anonim edits. Then he accused me of sockpuppetry on'' oct. 10'' for using IPs. pfff I was clearly stated it on my talkpage. My roomate was blocked indef. Thanks to ''Tankred'' he does not want to participate in this wikipedia anymore. --] 14:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I used talk pages wich were '''ignored''' by ]. He deliberately uses very emotional words and phrases wich (in enwiki) istantly creates a negative image about me, without knowing the ongoing situation between us. And makes a false image about me and abt the backround of my contribs (for ex: ''well known vandal''). I already sent him warning templates to stop calling me a vandal. I'm not able to discuss with him, because he's not talking with me, I always tried to find a solution. Check anywhere. He clearly stated hatred against me several times, and he wants to kick me out of english wikipedia to defend his fakes and lies. (I proved that they are fakes and lies.) (He also faked a source) Not negotiating, not talking just attacking. His first edit on my discussion page was similar. My contribs are all were sourced, I wrote it on his discussion page also, and in the articles (as refs). Deleting them is vandalism. Check. B: I wrote on my userpage on ''sept 5''. that I do mainly anonim edits. Then he accused me of sockpuppetry on'' oct. 10'' for using IPs. pfff I was clearly stated it on my talkpage. My roomate was blocked indef. Thanks to ''Tankred'' he does not want to participate in this wikipedia anymore. --] 14:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I used talk pages wich were '''ignored''' by ]. He deliberately uses very emotional words and phrases wich (in enwiki) istantly creates a negative image about me, without knowing the ongoing situation between us. And makes a false image about me and abt the backround of my contribs (for ex: ''well known vandal''). I already sent him warning templates to stop calling me a vandal. I'm not able to discuss with him, because he's not talking with me, I always tried to find a solution. Check anywhere. He clearly stated hatred against me several times, and he wants to kick me out of english wikipedia to defend his fakes and lies. (I proved that they are fakes and lies.) (He also faked a source) Not negotiating, not talking just attacking. His first edit on my discussion page was similar. My contribs are all were sourced, I wrote it on his discussion page also, and in the articles (as refs). Deleting them is vandalism. Check. B: I wrote on my userpage on ''sept 5''. that I do mainly anonim edits. Then he accused me of sockpuppetry on'' oct. 10'' for using IPs. pfff I was clearly stated it on my talkpage. My roomate was blocked indef. Thanks to ''Tankred'' he does not want to participate in this wikipedia anymore. --] 14:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Since I believe that VinceB's arguments are a bit misleading and his accusations against me unsubstantiated, I must briefly comment on them. As for his sockpuppetry confirmed by ChceckUser, a biref overview of the case can be found here. As for the previous vandalism, all VinceB's edits and the warning templates that he removed from his talk page can be traced back. Just to give you a handful of examples, he has blanked whole paragraphs, changed geographic names into their Hungarian version (hiding all the official non-Hungarian names), and made subtle nasty changes of numerical data. After he was warned, he just pasted the same warning templates to the talk pages of User:PANONIAN and me. He has also made failed attempts to use the formal procedures against at least three different users who disagreed with his disruptive edits (reporting false incidents, vandalism, personal attacks, and initiating investigation or arbitration). All those attempts failed and VinceB has been blocked by two previously uninvolved admins for sockpuppetry and edit warring. As for the alleged "fake source", this accusation by VinceB's sockpuppet (and now repeated by the puppetmaster himself) is non sense and I do not understand what he means by it. He does not like the descripion of Fidesz – Hungarian Civic Union as a nationalist party, but this description is now supported by four references to the leading academic journals and BBC. Neither of them is "fake" and this fact can be easily proven. Please, do not unblock VinceB. Normal editors of the articles about Central Europe need some rest. Tankred 18:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Category: