| Revision as of 14:58, 22 February 2018 editSquatch347 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,165 edits →Jewish Views on Slavery: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:59, 22 February 2018 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by Squatch347 - "→Jewish Views on Slavery: new section"Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| == Jewish Views on Slavery == | == Jewish Views on Slavery == | ||
| Hi, I was reviewing your most recent addition to the Jewish views on slavery page. I noticed that you added that the Biblical concept was to treat slaves as chattel. No argument that that is what that source says, but I don't think that that represents the consensus opinion of historians. Curious if you were up to having a quick discussion about it? | Hi, I was reviewing your most recent addition to the Jewish views on slavery page. I noticed that you added that the Biblical concept was to treat slaves as chattel. No argument that that is what that source says, but I don't think that that represents the consensus opinion of historians. Curious if you were up to having a quick discussion about it? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
Revision as of 14:59, 22 February 2018
Tendentious editing
Hi, it is fine to have a disagreement and a discussion about that disagreement but when umpteen people with vast experience are telling you that you are wrong, it is usually not a good idea to keep banging the drum with exactly the same arguments, over and over. That might be considered tendentious behaviour. I think you may soon need to re-assess what you are doing at the WP:NORN thread and elsewhere in relation to the election figures. - Sitush (talk) 12:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Jewish Views on Slavery
Hi, I was reviewing your most recent addition to the Jewish views on slavery page. I noticed that you added that the Biblical concept was to treat slaves as chattel. No argument that that is what that source says, but I don't think that that represents the consensus opinion of historians. Curious if you were up to having a quick discussion about it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Squatch347 (talk • contribs) 14:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)