Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 05:10, 21 October 2006

Novels B‑class Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel B This article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Novelinfoboxneeded

Uh

Should there be anything discussing the theories of hidden messages, psychology or philisophical meanings of the things in Alice and Wonderland? I, at least, have heard in the past many things about the hidden messages or ideas within this story. An example would be the references within the Matrix trilogy, and Matrix fan-base (Red Queen, Looking Glass, Rabbit, etc) and the story may even have a cult following.

Why not, as long as it's also mentioned that Carroll himself didn't seem to be aware of any such "hidden messages" (beyond private jokes for his friends and child-friends. Carlo 18:40, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Dates are confusing

why is the dat of the boat trip where the sotry of alice was originally told LATER than the date of the manuscript being given to Alice??!?!

Nonsense

The articile attributes Freudian elements to Alice in wonderland. While it is true the book can be interpreted in this way, Lewis Caroll was not influenced by Freud because Freudian psychology hadn't started when he wrote Alice in Wonderland.

Look at the Trivia part of the article. I don't quite understand how that is accurate. It says:

In what might seem to be nonsensical, Alice says 'Let me see: four times five is twelve, and four times six is thirteen, and four times seven is - oh dear! I shall never get to twenty at that rate!' This may seem mathematically absurd, until you consider that she's working in basic math: 4*5=12 in base 18, 4*6=13 in base 21 .. if you keep doing this and increase the base increment by three each time, it's actually impossible to reach 20.

But that's not true at all. The pattern here is 4*x in base . You start with x=5 and increase it by one each time. So, 4*7=14 in base 24, 4*8=15 in base 27, 4*9=16 in base 30, 4*10=17 in base 33, 4*11=18 in base 36, 4*12=19 in base 39, and 4*13=20 in base 42. So, if you maintain the pattern, you will reach 20.

That's not necessarily true. 4*13 does not equal 20 at base 42, it would more likely equal something like 1A, as the decimal value of 11 is represented in another symbol, like in Hexadecimal. Put simply, 4 * 13 = 52 in decimal, and 20 at base 42 = 84 in decimal.

somebody deleted the nonsense section. i vote to bring it back. personally i find it interesting because it further explains the knowledge of the author and that the book is not merely a "children" book. much like Dr. Sus' work.

Drug Reference

Is someone planning to write about the drug undertones of this book or should this link be removed? -Adrian

I added a picture of the Caterpillar and a hookah; I see no reason why not, since the picture is already used in the Hookah article anyway. -- Lament

(although this reverse the orders of posting it makes more sense to stick it here)

I wasn't having a go at you, Lament, it's just the link here made no sense. Hookah probably isn't the 'drug overtones' the writer of that link had in mind. Why did the page refer to The Matrix and not older references? Surely people who've read the book would have some interest in the surreal?-Adrian

Instead of "drug overtones" i used the term "similarities to psychedelic experiences," which i think is more neutral. "Drug overtones" (or undertones) seems to suggest these were intended by the author, which i doubt was the case. -- Flearosca

I think my drug referances should be left up there are obviouse overtones in the book, so I dont understand why my drug referances keeps getting deleted.It isnt nonsense and this side of interpritation should be looked at as well as the others User:Ro-man

If you can supply some reputable references that support your conjectures and you're able to avoid weasel words, then your references can be re-introduced. Until then, they stay out. - EurekaLott 02:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Canonical

What does "canonical" mean in this context? -- Zoe

Pseudonym

I have reverted Ed Poor's change - aren't I daring? ;) As I see it, a book should be credited to its author, even if the author wrote it under a pseudonym. Furthermore, Dodgson is referred to as "Dodgson" throughout the article, and we shouldn't expect readers to already know that Carroll = Dodgson. And we certainly shouldn't expect people to click on the "Lewis Carroll" link just to find out that they are the same person. Of course, changing "Dodgson" to "Carroll" throughout the article would overcome this problem, but it would be crazy to call him "Carroll" when discussing his real life! -- Oliver PEREIRA 03:59 Dec 5, 2002 (UTC)

As someone who uses a pseudonym in all his writings, i disagree with your point of view, but i am not reverting the changes you made. -- Flearosca

For the recording of an author's works in a factual, historical, and posthumous context for encyclopedic purposes, I am inclined to agree with Oliver. And especially for someone so famous, much like nobody really refers to Stephen King's pseudo-published works as Richard Bachman. --Super Jamie 23:38, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Custom Classics

"Customized classics" are a range of "editions" that put your picture on the cover, add a happy ending to Romeo and Juliet, and replace the names in the texts with the names of your choice: "Oh, Brad, Brad, wherefore art thou Brad?" You can get a customized edition of Moby Dick, with either Ahab or Moby bearing your own name. I'm trying hard to suppose that such links are added in good faith, and not as vandalism. Try to imagine EB referring to this type of product in its articles about literary classics. Misplaced Pages is a serious encyclopedia too. I've removed one of these links from this article, just as I have removed the same user's nonsense text in Romance novel and Romantic fiction. --Bishonen 19:11, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Is Alice in Wonderland really about a bad trip?

I have recently read Alice in Wonderland. I checked it out from the library, and found it a most difficult book to read. Much of it made no sense. However, I did conclude that Caroll was a drug user. I mean, the mushroom, the hookah. There are so many things about that book that could most undeniably be seen as someones trip on shrooms or acid. The Disney movie didn't help much either, with all the colors and everything all over the place. I've done shrooms once and I didn't like it, but once was enough to be able to associate the trip with the story. I mean, I felt like I was lost in some sort of wonderland. Then I watched the movie while I was on it. You do weird things, like my girlfriend. I went up to her and held her hand while on it. She looked at me and just said, "why are you touching me?" not angry, just asking. As I look back, that just reminds me of the way the characters were in the movie and book. Like you ask yourself hard questions. It's a simple show of affection, but she asks me why? "Well, I don't know because I love you" I say. "Why do you love me?" she asks. I really couldn't answer that. I mean how could I, being young and in a fairly new relationship. I was faced with a question I couldn't answer yet couldn't ignore. You think of those things that you normally wouldn't put thought to. Then I ask myself, what is love. I started to think that love was nothing. It's really weird, by the end of the whole thing I was laying on the floor, in a corner, in the fetal position. About the book though, no one seemed to worry about anyone but themselves. The feel of the book, and it may also be that the movie is influencing my perspective, is what it felt to be on shrooms. I feel as though I can associate with the mind set of the characters. It's hard to explain if you've never done them, I just wanted someone elses opinion. I was just wondering if anyone else agrees with me. Perhaps someone has read other more intellegent peoples theories as to why this seems to be a drug users story.

I think that anyone who has actually read about Lewis Carroll would find it very, very hard to imagine the man smoking psyllocibin. Carroll was a logician who liked to play word games and who enjoyed twisting logic until it broke. His personal habits appear to have been very, very abstemious.

Well, to correct you there, you sure don't smoke mushrooms... spores will get in your lungs and it could make you go blind if your eyes come in contact with the smoke. I bet he was a user.

He may have seemed that way to the people to the people that knew him, but fact tells a different story. It's a fact that Lewis CArroll smoked opium. He was also in love with the person alice was based off of. (A 7 year old niece or something.) As for the bad trip thing I don't know but it's possible that he tried to imagine what it would be like to be on different drugs. I'm just looking for what drug each character is on so it can give more insight on the movie.

It might or might not be about drugs, it just "could" be. Consult the characters Tweedledee and Tweedledum for further insight on that comment. Also, maybe you're too young to recall the Jefferson Airplane song White Rabbit which tells you to Go Ask Alice, speaking directly to this theory. Wahkeenah 22:45, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Shouldn't this bit be updated with the info from the Lewis Carroll wikipedia entry?

I don't think the whole book is about drugs and bad trip. I think it is about life. Esspecialy about the Lewis Carroll's life. He wrote the things he encountered while growing up. In Chapter IV: The Rabbit Sends in a Little Bill, Alice says:

There ought to be a book written about me, that there ought! And when I grow up, I'll write one--but I'm grown up now.

- b.evrim

He may have seemed that way to the people to the people that knew him, but fact tells a different story. It's a fact that Lewis Carroll smoked opium. He was also in love with the person alice was based off of. (A 7 year old niece or something.)

Ummm...no, that is not a "fact," and I would like you to source that fact. Your near complete ignorance of the person the story was based on ("A 7 year old niece or something") sort of demonstrates that you are really in no position to be making pontifical pronouncements about "facts."

The story isn't really "about" anything (aside from perhaps nonsense). It's sole purpose was to entertain the many child friends that Carroll had; so to say it was about life or drugs wouldn't be very accurate. The periodic references to people doesn't give the book any sort of deeper meaning.

There's no proof that Carroll was involved with any drugs or hallucinagens, and if there is I'd like to see it. I don't remember the quote exactly, but in one of the notes from Martin Gardner in The Annotated Alice, he says that Carroll most likely wasn't on drugs and was probably just a very imaginative person.

Jeff Noon's Automated Alice

Maybe there should be a reference to the book "Automated Alice" by Jeff Noon, a writer from Great Britain. He describes the book as a trequel to the first two alice books by Lewis Carrol.

Some info about the book can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/Jeff_Noon

and here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0552999059/ref=ase_125/202-6476551-2460615

Article size

As the article size is currently over 32 KB, we should consider dividing it. I think the Works influenced section, which currently makes up ~1/3 of the article, could easily be split into a seperate article, especially as it's both not that important for the original work itself and continuesly growing. --Fritz Saalfeld (Talk) 14:13, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

I agree. What is the optimal title? Works influenced by Alice in Wonderland or Cultural influences of Alice in Wonderland or something else? Kusma (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Good idea. One comparable example is The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy cultural references. - EurekaLott 17:07, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Given the current section heading, Works influenced by Alice in Wonderland seems like the right choice to me. --Fritz Saalfeld (Talk) 12:02, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

I also agree on separating this section under the proposed title. Blahma 16:05, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

I have just split the articles. Please help cleaning up the lead paragraph of Works influenced by Alice in Wonderland. Kusma (talk) 16:32, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

My additions "unhelpful"

My additions are allegedly unhelpful. The article doesn't discuss multiple translations of the book, quality of translations, graphical visions of the book by different designers. What is wrong with "Alice" (by Bromski and Gruza) movie? Are only strict adaptations O.K.? Xx236 10:07, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Magic Mushrooms or simply cannabis?

Obviously a story like this may have involved the use of drugs (even during the 19th century), I haven't tried shrooms but enough cannabis to get the idea. Like someone wrote in the earlier part of this thread it is a difficult story to comprehend.

Praise

The person who wrote this:

Taken from this perspective, the novel (as well as Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There) is a sinister, pernicious world characterized by persons who exist fully by a self-sustaining logic that exists without reference to outside influence, including the influence of a sane, rational, and moral mind. By this perspective, at its essence, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland is not a dream but a surreal nightmare involving loss of control, inability to communicate or reason, rampant uncontrolled change of one's self and everything around, and a total inability to gain any foundation in the world.

deserves a big shiny medal.

Genre: fantasy or horror?

I cleaned up the last part of this section on American McGee so that it makes more sense to the average reader. However, given the format and tone of the rest of the section, I'm not sure if this part is even necessary or particularly relevant. I just want to see what everyone else thinks. - Runch 14:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

It should be obvious what it's really about. All that craziness and inability to reason with people is how a lot of people, particularly children, see real life.. with all its baseless rules and ability to make you feel powerless.

adding to the cinematic adaptations section

I am a terrible writer (or at least I seem to think so) and so I do not wish to add anything to this article on my own. But I would like to point out that in the cinematic adaptation section, at least one adaptation was missing. In 1998, there was a made for TV adaptation Called "Alice Through the Looking Glass" starring Kate Beckinsale. here is the link to IMDB with the information: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0167758/

I do hope this is helpful to someone.

Pratchett on Alice

The article says "One of the best-known critics is fantasy writer Terry Pratchett, who has openly stated that he dislikes the book". While true (wow, he "openly stated" it?), its placing in the article seems to convey (upon careless reading) that Pratchett is one of the most outspoken critics of the Alice books or that his has a somewhat central place among Alice criticism, but the the reference only has a line or two about the books being unfunny and revolting. I think the proper place for mentioning Pratchett would be as just an entry in a (small) list of people hating Alice, if such a list could be put up here. --Shreevatsa 07:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Terry Pratchett is quite successful, and in my opinion, quite good. And he is often regarded as a children's writer, although he writes for all ages. There's no need to make the article a puff piece. Carlo 11:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I've read some Terry Pratchett, and I agree he's quite good. But that's beside the point. The mention of him should obviously stay on the page; my comment was more a formatting issue than a content one. I mean, does "best-known critic" mean that he is well-known and a critic, or that he somehow spearheads the anti-Alice movement? :) It probably means the former, but sounds like the latter (to me). Has he repeatedly criticised Alice, as others (I assume) have done? Are there references besides the one given, which is scant?

I guess all this is too much nitpicking. It just sounded odd to mention, in the very second line, the name of one random person (albeit famous) without any reason for his being special. I'd be happier if there were names of more people who dislike Alice. --Shreevatsa 14:32, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Mathematical Symbolism

This article does not talk about the mathematical symbolism of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland at all. That is a very important part of the book. It should be discussed. FDR MyTalk 0:500:09 October 21, 2006 (UTC)

• B-Class novel articles
• Top-importance novel articles
• WikiProject Novels articles