Misplaced Pages

User talk:Einsidler: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:08, 22 October 2006 editEinsidler (talk | contribs)147 editsm Links← Previous edit Revision as of 07:15, 22 October 2006 edit undoMONGO (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,644 edits Links: okayNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:
**Is that a personal attack? If so, care to come forward and discuss who you are attacking?--] 06:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC) **Is that a personal attack? If so, care to come forward and discuss who you are attacking?--] 06:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
***The fact it only took you 2 minutes to jump on this talk page is very amusing. Basing official site policy on some demented view of a website seems pretty retarded to me. Purhaps it would make sense to actually read the articles being linked to before removing links. Less than half ED has anything offensive to any particular person, and IMO the policy should just apply to those articles. (Ironically while getting these links I did end up so I can see the reason for banning '''certain''' ED links) --] 07:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC) ***The fact it only took you 2 minutes to jump on this talk page is very amusing. Basing official site policy on some demented view of a website seems pretty retarded to me. Purhaps it would make sense to actually read the articles being linked to before removing links. Less than half ED has anything offensive to any particular person, and IMO the policy should just apply to those articles. (Ironically while getting these links I did end up so I can see the reason for banning '''certain''' ED links) --] 07:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
****It is obvious that you are an editor at ED...and you state clearly on your userpage that you prefer that website. Since your edits here are not much better than the average troll, I'll give you one hour to remove the links you have posted above, or I will block you in accordance with the above mentioned arbcom decision. Up to you.--] 07:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:15, 22 October 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Einsidler, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- RHaworth 17:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

some argue

I have moved Some argue to User:Einsidler/Some argue, mainly under the avoid self-reference rule. It may be accepted in the Misplaced Pages: namespace. But no-one is ever going to read it unless you create links to it, eg. from Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view. -- RHaworth 17:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

just curious

I was wondering... how did you notice my uploaded pictures so quickly yesterday? I hadn't even posted them to an article. You were quick! -- Onecandleprovideslight 12:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:EDinfo

Template:EDinfo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. bogdan 14:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Links

Regarding ED, please see: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/MONGO#Links to ED, they are no longer allowed here as they have been posting some rather defamatory harassment articles about several Wikipedians. I have removed a link from your user page and one from The Game (game), thank you.--Konst.able 05:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Not every article on ED is attacking anything. I'll leave the link out of the talk page as I see that even The Game (game) is serious business on wikipedia, but I'm not having links removed from my userbox because of some retard having sand in his vagina about a few articles. kthxbi --Einsidler 06:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Is that a personal attack? If so, care to come forward and discuss who you are attacking?--MONGO 06:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
      • The fact it only took you 2 minutes to jump on this talk page is very amusing. Basing official site policy on some demented view of a website seems pretty retarded to me. Purhaps it would make sense to actually read the articles being linked to before removing links. Less than half ED has anything offensive to any particular person, and IMO the policy should just apply to those articles. Funny articles from random page (Ironically while getting these links I did end up here so I can see the reason for banning certain ED links) --Einsidler 07:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
        • It is obvious that you are an editor at ED...and you state clearly on your userpage that you prefer that website. Since your edits here are not much better than the average troll, I'll give you one hour to remove the links you have posted above, or I will block you in accordance with the above mentioned arbcom decision. Up to you.--MONGO 07:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)