Revision as of 14:10, 13 March 2018 editCollect (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers47,160 edits →Controversy: "controversy" is a horrid section title← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:12, 13 March 2018 edit undoCollect (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers47,160 edits →Australia Defence Force contract: neutral wording as Y&R was not the one making those postsNext edit → | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
==Australia Defence Force contract== | ==Australia Defence Force contract== | ||
The agency attracted controversy in May 2011 after it won a contract to "clean up" the social media policy of the ] (ADF) |
The agency attracted controversy in May 2011 after it won a contract to "clean up" the social media policy of the ] (ADF) as some of the social media posts by GPYR were sexually or politically controversial. A spokesperson for George Patterson Y&R stated: "We do not believe that this material is in any way relevant to an assessment of the nature or quality of the professional services that GPY&R provides."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/defence-review-teams-sex-controversy/story-e6frea6u-1226059991128 |title=Defence review team's sex controversy |last=McPhedran|first=Ian|author-link=Ian McPhedran |date=21 May 2011 |work=] |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120821053114/http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/defence-review-teams-sex-controversy/story-e6frea6u-1226059991128|archivedate=21 August 2012 |deadurl=no}} {{cite web |url=http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/defence-review-teams-sex-controversy/story-e6frf7l6-1226060003731 |title=Defence review team's sex controversy |author=McPhedran, Ian |date=21 May 2011 |work=] |archiveurl=http://archive.today/2018.02.19-004644/http://www.heraldsun.com.au/archive/news/defence-review-teams-sex-controversy/news-story/7747a1af6dfdfc594dc12b0027e3dd38 |archivedate=19 February 2018 |deadurl=no}} {{cite web |url=http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/defence-review-teams-sex-controversy/story-e6freuzr-1226060003731 |title=Defence review team's sex controversy |author=McPhedran, Ian |date=21 May 2011 |work=] |archiveurl=http://archive.today/2018.02.19-004721/https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/defence-review-teams-sex-controversy/news-story/7747a1af6dfdfc594dc12b0027e3dd38 |archivedate=19 February 2018 |deadurl=no}} {{cite web |url=http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/defence-review-teams-sex-controversy/story-e6frg12c-1226060040150 |title=Defence review team's sex controversy |author=McPhedran, Ian |date=21 May 2011 |work=] |archiveurl=http://archive.today/2018.02.19-004628/https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/defence-review-teams-sex-controversy-ng-a7f28d8a3d70b593f426a20a606b055c |archivedate=19 February 2018 |deadurl=no}}</ref> Earlier that month, the ADF "side-stepped" allegations that they had a conflict of interest in awarding the contract to George Patterson Y&R.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/10/no-conflict-over-defence-force-social-media-probe/ |title=‘No conflict’ over Defence Force social media probe |last=Cook |first=Andrew |date=10 May 2011 |work=] |archiveurl=http://archive.today/2018.02.19-010417/https://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/10/no-conflict-over-defence-force-social-media-probe/ |archivedate=19 February 2018 |deadurl=no}}</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 14:12, 13 March 2018
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Y&R ANZ" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (July 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Company type | Subsidiary |
---|---|
Industry | Integrated Marketing Communications |
Headquarters | Level 15, 35 Clarence St Sydney |
Parent | WPP plc |
Website | www.yranz.com |
Y&R ANZ (formerly known as George Patterson Y&R) is an Australasian advertising agency. The agency was formed in 2005 when the international advertising holding conglomerate WPP Group acquired the Australian marketing communications company, The Communications Group (TCG).
History
The George Patterson agency was founded on 1 November 1934. George Patterson had started his advertising career at the age of 18 in 1908. He left McPherson’s in 1913 and took on the job of advertising manager at a magazine in New York, before returning to Australia at the outbreak of war in 1914. In 1919, he started his first agency in a partnership with Norman Catts and Catts-Patterson became Australia’s largest agency.
One of the agency’s early clients was Palmolive. In 1921, George Patterson offered to launch the brand in Australia and with a great success.
The agency represented the Australian Defence Force for 13 years before they lost their contract with them in 2013 to competitors Havas.
In 2017, George Patterson Y&R (GPY&R) was rebranded to Y&R ANZ.
Mergers and acquisitions
TCG's primary advertising asset was the George Patterson agency which had dominated the Australian advertising market throughout the 2nd half of the 20th century. Known as "Patts" in the industry, the business had been George Patterson Advertising from its formation in 1934 when George Patterson demerged the Sydney and Melbourne business he had started in 1918 from Catts-Patterson; George Patterson Bates from the 1990s, when the agency's long-standing Asian affiliation with Bates Worldwide was formalised with an acquisition by Bates, then one of the two worldwide network holdings of Saatchi & Saatchi PLC; and George Patterson Partners at the time of the WPP acquisition, having been primed for sale under that name by the TCG management-buyout group since 2003.
WPP merged the Australian offices of its worldwide Young & Rubicam brand with George Patterson. WPP had acquired the worldwide Young & Rubicam brand in 2000.
Accolades
- Cannes Lions 2012 Australian Agency of the Year
- World’s Top Ten Agencies, Gunn Report 2013
Australia Defence Force contract
The agency attracted controversy in May 2011 after it won a contract to "clean up" the social media policy of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) as some of the social media posts by GPYR were sexually or politically controversial. A spokesperson for George Patterson Y&R stated: "We do not believe that this material is in any way relevant to an assessment of the nature or quality of the professional services that GPY&R provides." Earlier that month, the ADF "side-stepped" allegations that they had a conflict of interest in awarding the contract to George Patterson Y&R.
References
- Hayes, Alex (5 December 2013). "Defence Force moves to Havas from George Patterson Y&R". Mumbrella.
{{cite web}}
: Check|archiveurl=
value (help); Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - Ryan, Rosemary (27 October 2005). "WPP Announces What Everyone Already Knew". bandt.com.au. Retrieved 20 May 2011.
- "GPY&R Shines At Cannes 2012 - LBBOnline". Archived from the original on 11 August 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - McPhedran, Ian (21 May 2011). "Defence review team's sex controversy". The Advertiser. Archived from the original on 21 August 2012.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) McPhedran, Ian (21 May 2011). "Defence review team's sex controversy". Herald Sun. Archived from the original on 19 February 2018.{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) McPhedran, Ian (21 May 2011). "Defence review team's sex controversy". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 19 February 2018.{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) McPhedran, Ian (21 May 2011). "Defence review team's sex controversy". Perth Now. Archived from the original on 19 February 2018.{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - Cook, Andrew (10 May 2011). "'No conflict' over Defence Force social media probe". Crikey. Archived from the original on 19 February 2018.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help)