User:GabrielF/ConspiracyNoticeboard: Difference between revisions

< User:GabrielF Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:41, 23 October 2006 editDHeyward (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,753 edits I moved NBGPWS comments to Gabriels talk page where it belongs.← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:46, 23 October 2006 edit undoNBGPWS (talk \| contribs)1,647 edits byron insert _ Rosicrucian took action cause of my link! Quit seleting this!Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Note to editors - please sign your comments. Thanks. ] 02:30, 12 October 2006 (UTC)		Note to editors - please sign your comments. Thanks. ] 02:30, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

	List of 9/11 conspiracy articles currently on AfD: (as of 10/20/06). Note that I don't necessarily support deletion in all of these cases, but I do feel that there are a plethora of stub articles on individuals who are part of the 9/11 "truth movement" and their books and that in many cases the subjects are non-notable and the articles will never be able to develop into something encyclopedic. Although I would like to assume good faith, I suspect that these articles have been created to legitimize and promote this movement and I feel strongly that this undermines wikipedia's credibility and legitimacy and violates some of our most important principles.		List of 9/11 conspiracy articles currently on AfD: (as of 10/20/06). Note that I don't necessarily support deletion in all of these cases, but I do feel that there are a plethora of stub articles on individuals who are part of the 9/11 "truth movement" and their books and that in many cases the subjects are non-notable and the articles will never be able to develop into something encyclopedic. Although I would like to assume good faith, I suspect that these articles have been created to legitimize and promote this movement and I feel strongly that this undermines wikipedia's credibility and legitimacy and violates some of our most important principles.
Line 9:		Line 9:
	# ] 18:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)		# ] 18:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
	#]		#]
			#] A new article for the group's consideration. ] 04:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

	Already deleted:		Already deleted:

Revision as of 04:46, 23 October 2006

Note to editors - please sign your comments. Thanks. GabrielF 02:30, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

List of 9/11 conspiracy articles currently on AfD: (as of 10/20/06). Note that I don't necessarily support deletion in all of these cases, but I do feel that there are a plethora of stub articles on individuals who are part of the 9/11 "truth movement" and their books and that in many cases the subjects are non-notable and the articles will never be able to develop into something encyclopedic. Although I would like to assume good faith, I suspect that these articles have been created to legitimize and promote this movement and I feel strongly that this undermines wikipedia's credibility and legitimacy and violates some of our most important principles.

Current AfDs:

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Yellowcake forgery Bush CT, and a damn good one at that. --Aaron 18:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages talk:Single purpose account#SPA mention Not an AfD per se, but a discussion in which an inclusionist editor is attempting to get enough consensus to ban {{spa}} tags. This, of course, would be a disaster for anyone interested in nominating for AfD any article at all on any subject, since it would in essence make it against the guidelines to even bring up bad faith and obvious trolling, no matter how blatant. (See also the discussion in the section just above "SPA mention" on that page; it's roughly the same attempt by the same editor only a few days earlier. --Aaron 03:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Michael Rivero -- prepare for the whatreallyhappened.com Anschlüss. Morton devonshire 05:46, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Attempt to resurrect Andy Stephenson Tbeatty 18:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pathological skepticism
The Byron Insert A new article for the group's consideration. NBGPWS 04:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Already deleted:

Merged:

Kept (no consensus):

Misplaced Pages:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_September_3#Template:911tm (19 deletes vs 7 keeps)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Terror Timeline (16 deletes vs 10 keeps)
Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/9/11:_Press_for_Truth (19 deletes vs 22 keeps)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/911: In Plane Site (second nomination) (21 keeps vs 21 deletes)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center (I'm not even going to try to count that mess; see Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Controlled_demolition_hypothesis_for_the_collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center#Closing_rationales for closing admin's rationale)
Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Webster_G._Tarpley (26 deletes vs 9 keeps) (I guess a 74% delete vote is not good enough for some closers -- bias?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morton devonshire (talk • contribs) (This isn't a vote, and your AFD habits are a very good reason why that's a good idea.) Derex 05:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The War on Freedom - (21 deletes vs 13 keeps)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/James W. Walter (second nomination) - (16 keeps vs 16 deletes)

Kept

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mathias Bröckers