| Revision as of 06:39, 23 March 2018 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,555,872 editsm Substing templates: {{3rr}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:41, 23 March 2018 edit undoValjean (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,275 edits →Violation of DS restrictions and edit warring: will request leniencyNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- ] (]) <u><small>'''''PingMe'''''</small></u> 06:38, 23 March 2018 (UTC) | '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- ] (]) <u><small>'''''PingMe'''''</small></u> 06:38, 23 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
| : As required by the rules, I will report this incident, but will request leniency for you because you are presumably new here. -- ] (]) <u><small>'''''PingMe'''''</small></u> 06:40, 23 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:41, 23 March 2018
bye
Violation of DS restrictions and edit warring
You have just violated the following restriction:
- "Consensus required: All editors must obtain consensus on the talk page of this article before reinstating any edits that have been challenged (via reversion). If in doubt, don't make the edit."
See the conditions at the top of Talk:Trump campaign–Russian meetings. Your restoration can also be seen as edit warring, so here's a template which explains that:
Your recent editing history at Talk:Trump campaign–Russian meetings shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 06:38, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- As required by the rules, I will report this incident, but will request leniency for you because you are presumably new here. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 06:40, 23 March 2018 (UTC)