Misplaced Pages

Jan Grabowski: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:08, 26 March 2018 view sourceIcewhiz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users38,036 edits Negative reviews: add esponse← Previous edit Revision as of 13:20, 26 March 2018 view source Xx236 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,481 edits Negative reviewsNext edit →
Line 76: Line 76:
Historian ], in a review posted on histmag.org of the 2011 book, writes that, while some historians try to seek truth calmly and impartially, others prefer passing condemnatory judgments, and Grabowski has chosen the latter path: Grabowski is largely focused on finding those who were supposedly guilty of collaboration, and is averse to acknowledging those who showed commendable behaviors. Męczykowski notes that Grabowski incorrectly accuses Poland's ] (IPN) of trying to inflate the number of Polish citizens who helped Jews. Męczykowski writes that Grabowski contradicts himself on certain points. Męczykowski writes that Grabowski, in calling upon Poles to admit their guilt, seems unaware that there has long since been an ongoing debate in Poland about Polish participation in atrocities against Jews, including educational programs prepared by Poland's IPN—contradicting Grabowski's statements about the Institute.<ref>"Jan Grabowski – ''Judenjagd. Polowanie na Żydów 1942-1945''" – ''recenzja'' Łukasz Męczykowski </ref> Historian ], in a review posted on histmag.org of the 2011 book, writes that, while some historians try to seek truth calmly and impartially, others prefer passing condemnatory judgments, and Grabowski has chosen the latter path: Grabowski is largely focused on finding those who were supposedly guilty of collaboration, and is averse to acknowledging those who showed commendable behaviors. Męczykowski notes that Grabowski incorrectly accuses Poland's ] (IPN) of trying to inflate the number of Polish citizens who helped Jews. Męczykowski writes that Grabowski contradicts himself on certain points. Męczykowski writes that Grabowski, in calling upon Poles to admit their guilt, seems unaware that there has long since been an ongoing debate in Poland about Polish participation in atrocities against Jews, including educational programs prepared by Poland's IPN—contradicting Grabowski's statements about the Institute.<ref>"Jan Grabowski – ''Judenjagd. Polowanie na Żydów 1942-1945''" – ''recenzja'' Łukasz Męczykowski </ref>


Historian ], in his review of the 2011 book, lists what he considers to be flaws and problems. Musial writes that Grabowski makes mistakes, ones that are sometimes easy to catch even for a casual reader. Musial notes that the book does not contain many sources. According to Musial, Grabowski shuns the literature on the subject or is perhaps simply not familiar with it. Musial also criticizes his use of trial transcripts to generalize attitudes about Jews to the local population. Additionally, the book lacks witness statements from Polish inhabitants, archives from the regional Polish resistance, and German statements. He writes that Grabowski ignores the hard economic conditions and the deportations of Poles from the described area, which Musial believes must have colored attitudes among the Poles. Musial notes that, while Grabowski writes extensively about antisemitic agitation before the war, the Germans' antisemitic campaign receives a mere three sentences. According to Musial, Grabowski lowers the number of Jewish survivors, while inflating the number of Poles complicit in German crimes. In his critique, Musial writes that Grabowski never questions statements from Jewish witnesess, while being highly critical of statements made by Poles.<ref>''"Judenjagd – 'umiejętne działanie' czy zbrodnicza perfidia?"'', ''Dzieje Najnowsze: kwartalnik poświęcony historii XX wieku'', published by the Institute of History of the ], vol. 43, no. 2, 2011.</ref> Grabowski rejected Musial's criticism say it was inept, said that Musial had previously attacked in a similar manner at least two other respected Polish historians, and that the attack was an attempt to disavow serious historical research on the basis of the subject matter and conclusion and not on the quality of the research method.<ref>, Dzieje Najnowsze, Jan Grabowski, 2011</ref> Historian ], in his review of the 2011 book, lists what he considers to be flaws and problems. Musial writes that Grabowski makes mistakes, ones that are sometimes easy to catch even for a casual reader. Musial notes that the book does not contain many sources. According to Musial, Grabowski shuns the literature on the subject or is perhaps simply not familiar with it. Musial also criticizes his use of trial transcripts to generalize attitudes about Jews to the local population. Additionally, the book lacks witness statements from Polish inhabitants, archives from the regional Polish resistance, and German statements. He writes that Grabowski ignores the hard economic conditions and the deportations of Poles from the described area, which Musial believes must have colored attitudes among the Poles. Musial notes that, while Grabowski writes extensively about antisemitic agitation before the war, the Germans' antisemitic campaign receives a mere three sentences. According to Musial, Grabowski lowers the number of Jewish survivors, while inflating the number of Poles complicit in German crimes. In his critique, Musial writes that Grabowski never questions statements from Jewish witnesess, while being highly critical of statements made by Poles.<ref>''"Judenjagd – 'umiejętne działanie' czy zbrodnicza perfidia?"'', ''Dzieje Najnowsze: kwartalnik poświęcony historii XX wieku'', published by the Institute of History of the ], vol. 43, no. 2, 2011.</ref> Grabowski rejected Musial's criticism say it was inept, said that Musial had previously attacked in a similar manner at least two other respected Polish historians, and that the attack was an attempt to disavow serious historical research on the basis of the subject matter and conclusion and not on the quality of the research method.<ref>, Dzieje Najnowsze, Jan Grabowski, 2011</ref> Grabowski's letter was answered by Musiał.


===Positive reviews=== ===Positive reviews===

Revision as of 13:20, 26 March 2018

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (March 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Jan Grabowski
File:Jan Grabowski at USHMM.jpgJan Grabowski
Born1962
Warsaw
NationalityPolish-Canadian
OccupationHistorian
Known forThe Holocaust in Poland, 1939-1945 Polish-Jewish relations
TitleDr.
Academic background
Alma materUniversité de Montréal
Academic work
InstitutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Notable worksHunt for the Jews: Betrayal and Murder in German-Occupied Poland

Jan Grabowski (born 1962) is a Polish-Canadian historian on the faculty of the University of Ottawa, co-founder of the Polish Center for Holocaust Research, and author of numerous studies relating to the Holocaust in Poland as well as Jewish-Polish relations during the 1939–1945 period.

Life

Grabowski was born in Warsaw to mixed parentage. His Jewish father, from a well-assimilated Kraków family, survived the Holocaust hiding in Warsaw, and took part in the 1944 Warsaw Uprising. His Christian mother is from a noble Polish family. He immigrated to Canada in 1988, a year before the fall of communism.

According to Grabowski, he was involved in the underground printing presses for Solidarity as Independent Students' Union member between 1981 and 1985. In 1988 her had an invitation to continue his PhD in Canada, and he was able to leave as travel restrictions had been eased. As the time he thought "that communism was this rock that would never budge", and had he known that the regime would fall but a year later he would have stayed, though he does not regret moving to Canada.

Grabowski received his MA from the University of Warsaw in 1986, and his Ph.D. from the Université de Montréal in 1994. Since 1993 he has been on the faculty of the University of Ottawa. He co-founded the Polish Center for Holocaust Research and is the author of numerous studies relating to the Holocaust in Poland as well as Jewish-Polish relations during the 1939-1945 period. As an Ina Levine Invitational Scholar at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, he has conducted research into the Polish Blue Police during the Holocaust in Nazi-occupied Poland.

Hunt for the Jews

In 2011 Grabowski published a book in Polish, Judenjagd. Polowanie na Zydow 1942-1945; and, in 2013, a revised and augmented English-language edition, Hunt for the Jews: Betrayal and Murder in German-Occupied Poland. The book, vividly describing Judenjagd (German for "Jew hunts") in Poland, focuses on one pre-war rural county in southeastern Poland, Dąbrowa Tarnowska, included by Germans into Kreis Tarnow. According to Grabowski, a whole mechanism was set up to hunt Jews. While Germans supervised the mechanism, all the individuals on the ground were Poles: villager night watchmen, informers, police, firefighters, and others. This dense web made it almost impossible for escaping Jews to hide their identity. The book was sharply criticized in Poland in particular for Grabowski's estimate of 200,000 Jews killed by Poles during the Holocaust. Grabowski received several death threats, leading to increased security in his department at the University of Ottawa. According to Grabowski, his estimate of 200,000 Jews killed by Poles is very conservative, as he did not include victims of the Polish Blue Police, who according to Warsaw Ghetto historian Emanuel Ringelblum killed hundreds of thousands of Jews. The book was awarded the 2014 Yad Vashem International Book Prize.

Negative reviews

Grzegorz Berendt, a professor at the University of Gdańsk and a member of the Jewish Historical Institute, criticizes Grabowski's claim of 200,000 Jews having been killed by Poles as “hot air.” According to Berendt, available research puts the number of escaped Jews at 50,000; no other number has been established by research. According to Berendt, Grabowski's number comes from an interview given 30 years ago, at the end of his life, by Szymon Datner, who had not conducted studies relating to the whole of Poland or even to just one of its districts. Berendt writes that it is difficult to accept Grabowski's number as scientific truth. In response Grabowski wrote that Berendt's, who has yet to author his first book on the Holocaust, dismissiveness of Datner's claims is galling. According to Grabowski Datner had firsthand experience with the reality on the ground in occupied Poland as a Jew and in his 40 years of historical work. Furthermore, Emanuel Ringelblum provided an even larger estimate during the Holocaust from the Warsaw ghetto and current research has corroborated Datner's numbers. Grabowski suggested that Berendt apply his indignation towards correcting historical fallacies perpetuated in current Polish society such as responsibility for the Jedwabne pogrom and Kielce pogrom as well distortion present in the IPN sponsored Museum of Poles Saving Jews in Markowa.

Historian Piotr Gontarczyk says that Grabowski's media activities show a similar approach to that of Jan T. Gross, in many respects incompatible, in Gontarczyk's view, with classical standards of scientific scholarship.

Historian Łukasz Męczykowski, in a review posted on histmag.org of the 2011 book, writes that, while some historians try to seek truth calmly and impartially, others prefer passing condemnatory judgments, and Grabowski has chosen the latter path: Grabowski is largely focused on finding those who were supposedly guilty of collaboration, and is averse to acknowledging those who showed commendable behaviors. Męczykowski notes that Grabowski incorrectly accuses Poland's Institute of National Remembrance (IPN) of trying to inflate the number of Polish citizens who helped Jews. Męczykowski writes that Grabowski contradicts himself on certain points. Męczykowski writes that Grabowski, in calling upon Poles to admit their guilt, seems unaware that there has long since been an ongoing debate in Poland about Polish participation in atrocities against Jews, including educational programs prepared by Poland's IPN—contradicting Grabowski's statements about the Institute.

Historian Bogdan Musial, in his review of the 2011 book, lists what he considers to be flaws and problems. Musial writes that Grabowski makes mistakes, ones that are sometimes easy to catch even for a casual reader. Musial notes that the book does not contain many sources. According to Musial, Grabowski shuns the literature on the subject or is perhaps simply not familiar with it. Musial also criticizes his use of trial transcripts to generalize attitudes about Jews to the local population. Additionally, the book lacks witness statements from Polish inhabitants, archives from the regional Polish resistance, and German statements. He writes that Grabowski ignores the hard economic conditions and the deportations of Poles from the described area, which Musial believes must have colored attitudes among the Poles. Musial notes that, while Grabowski writes extensively about antisemitic agitation before the war, the Germans' antisemitic campaign receives a mere three sentences. According to Musial, Grabowski lowers the number of Jewish survivors, while inflating the number of Poles complicit in German crimes. In his critique, Musial writes that Grabowski never questions statements from Jewish witnesess, while being highly critical of statements made by Poles. Grabowski rejected Musial's criticism say it was inept, said that Musial had previously attacked in a similar manner at least two other respected Polish historians, and that the attack was an attempt to disavow serious historical research on the basis of the subject matter and conclusion and not on the quality of the research method. Grabowski's letter was answered by Musiał.

Positive reviews

Baudienst in occupied Kraków (suburban Czyżyny), circa 1941. Second from right is Karol Wojtyła, future Pope

John-Paul Himka wrote that he found "Grabowski's exploration of how the moral climate in rural Poland became fatally skewed during the Nazi occupation" innovative and enlightening. Himka notes that the Polish men of the Baudienst took part in Jew hunts with particular relish, Grabowski recording the atrocities in chilling detail. Himka concludes: "This is a well-written, well-researched, highly illuminating study that takes us deep into the mechanisms of the Holocaust in rural Poland. In short: a brilliant book, and a harrowing read."

Shimon Redlich, in his review, criticizes the book's structure, in particular the lengthy quotations and appendix, the careless "claim of 'hundreds of thousands' of Jews seeking shelter among the Polish populace", which according to Redlich cannot be extrapolated to the whole country based on one single area, as well as language that at times betrays emotional involvement. However, Redlich says the book "should become required reading for scholars and students of Polish-Jewish relations".

Joshua D. Zimmerman's review found Grabowski's work to be a "weighty, superbly researched study" that punctuates the myth of Polish innocence during the Holocaust. According to Zimmerman, Grabowski's study is not about defaming or glorifying Poland, but rather about the evidence.

Rosa Lehmann, in her review, found Grabowski's work to be outstanding and firmly grounded in solid research.

Michael Fleming's review found the book insightful into how Poles in rural Poland were, not infrequently, complicit with German genocide, challenging readers' myths.

Larry Ray in his review of Grabowski’s book called it "a highly systematic and scholarly study of atrocities and collaboration" and "an essential contribution to knowledge of the Holocaust and Polish-Jewish relations".

According to Timothy D. Snyder, The works of Jan T. Gross, Barbara Engelking, Grabowski, and other Polish historians is "a response to the myths of the Communist era, which are still convenient for some Polish nationalists of today, as well as an attempt to reestablish the Holocaust as a central part of Polish history.".

Support and condemnations

The website Fronda.pl ran a piece with the headline, "Sieg Heil, Mr. Grabowski", accompanied by a photo of Joseph Goebbels, following the publication of a favorable report in a German website. Grabowski sued the website's owner for libel and won.

In 2017, the Polish League Against Defamation released a statement signed by 134 Polish scientists protesting the "false and harmful portrayal of Poles and Poland during the Second World War and attempts to blame the Polish Nation for the Holocaust", which was sent to Grabowski's employer, the University of Ottawa, to all the colleges with which he was affiliated, and to all the publishers of his books. The statement pointed to German efforts to exterminate the Polish population itself, which made its occupation by Germany different from western Europe's occupation; numerous examples of Poles' assistance given to Jews; Poland's many wartime international protests at the plight of the Jewish population in German-occupied Poland; and the complexity of Polish-Jewish relations, aggravated by the Soviet occupation of eastern Poland.

Grabowski has been boycotted by the Polish-Canadian community, and Polish groups have attempted to have him fired from his academic position. According to multiple media reports, Grabowski has also faced harassment and death threats, leading to increased security patrols in his department at the University of Ottawa.

In Grabowski's defense, the Polish Center for Holocaust Research, which Grabowski co-founded, released a counter-letter signed by seven Holocaust historians, saying that "None of the 134 signatories is a Holocaust historian" and that "All these economists, linguists, oncologists, chemists, nuclear physicists, engineers, constructors of electromechanical appliances, environmental geologists, ethnomusicologists, theatrologists and priest professors present themselves as Holocaust experts, but cannot even quote the sources they refer to." Some 180 international historians of modern European history signed a letter in Grabowski's defense, saying his work "holds to the highest standards of academic research" and that the Polish League Against Defamation puts forth a "distorted and whitewashed version of the history of Poland during the Holocaust era". The historians further said they saw the campaign against Grabowski as "an attack on academic freedom and integrity."

Views

Grabowski has deplored plans for a monument to rescuers of Jews, to be located at Grzybowski Square, which was part of the wartime Warsaw Ghetto. He sees it as an attempt to rewrite history by inflating the role of the rescuers. Grabowski describes the rescuers as a "desperate, hunted, tiny minority" who were the exception to the rule. "Much of the Polish national ethos", says Grabowski, "is built on the heroic self-perception, and any attempt to show the darker side of wartime experience is met with indignation." The Ghetto site, he says, should be dedicated to Jewish suffering, and not to Polish courage.

Grabowski also criticizes the opening of the Ulma Family Museum of Poles Who Saved Jews in World War II, in Markowa, as a cynical use of the heroism of the exceptional Ulma family, in what he described as an attempt to present a false picture of the widespread saving of Jews in Poland, while according to him the reality was that the rescuers were a small, terrorized minority who feared, above all, their own Polish neighbors.

In 2018, following the Polish Parliament's adoption of a controversial Amendment to Poland's Act on the Institute of National Remembrance that would penalize "slandering or libeling the Polish nation" with imprisonment for up to three years, Grabowski compared the new legislation to pre-1939 law that had stipulated the same punishment. By way of example, he produced a 1936 Warsaw newspaper article which described a Jewish woman having been ejected from the University of Warsaw campus by Polish-chauvinist thugs. As she was being ejected, she exclaimed, "Polish animals!", and she was beaten up. But the police arrested her, not her assailants, and she was imprisoned for two months for insulting the Polish nation.

Grabowski recommended that the Israeli government refrain from dialogue with the Polish government, as, "given the current level of expressed anti-Semitism, I don’t think that any official meetings on this topic should take place." He further said that "The mass murder of Polish Jews was not abstract. It happened inside the space of the Polish nation, so this is why you cannot pretend that this is only a German-Jewish affair. There are no Polish bystanders in the Holocaust."

Works

  • Hunt for the Jews: Betrayal and Murder in German-Occupied Poland,  Indiana University Press, 2013, 312 pp., ISBN 978-02-53010-74-2.
  • Rescue for Money: ‘Paid Helpers’ in Poland, 1939-1945, Search and Research Series, Yad Vashem–The International Institute for Holocaust Research, Jerusalem, 2008, ISBN 9789653083257.
  • ציד היהודים; בגידה ורצח בפולין בימי הכיבוש הגרמני. Yad Vashem, Jerusalem, 2016. ​ISBN 9789653085312
  • Klucze i Kasa. Losy mienia żydowskiego w okupowanej Polsce, 1939-1945, Stowarzyszenie Centrum Badan nad Zagładą, Warszawa, 2014, 628 s. (ed. with Dariusz Libionka), Warsaw 2014 ​ISBN 978-83-63444-35-8​​

References

  1. ^ 'Orgy of Murder': The Poles Who 'Hunted' Jews and Turned Them Over to the Nazis, Ha'aretz, Ofer Aderet, 11 Feb 2017
  2. Twenty-five years since the fall of communism in Poland (inteview), Shannon Lough, 26 Feb 2014
  3. Fellow Dr. Jan Grabowski, at the USHMM website
  4. Jan Grabowski,"The Polish Police Collaboration in the Holocaust"
  5. Poland’s dark hunt, macleans, 7 Oct 2013
  6. ^ Holocaust writer Grabowski faces Polish fury, Jewish Chronicle, 18 Oct. 2013.
  7. ^ Holocaust law wields a 'blunt instrument' against Poland's past, BBC, 3 Feb 2018
  8. ^ Canadian historian joins uproar in Israel over Polish Holocaust law, CBC, 20 Feb. 2018.
  9. ^ Facing Death Threats for Highlighting Poland's Role in Holocaust, Historians Come to Scholar's Defense, Ha'aretz (AP), 20 June 2017
  10. "Hunt for the Jews snags Yad Vashem book prize", Times of Israel (JTA), 8 December 2014.
  11. "Professor Jan Grabowski wins the 2014 Yad Vashem International Book Prize", Yad Vashem, 4 December 2014.
  12. The Polish People Weren't Tacit Collaborators With Nazi Extermination of Jews (opinion) Grzegorz Berendt, Haaretz, 24 Feb. 2017.
  13. No, Poland's Elites Didn't Try to Save the Jews During the Holocaust, Jan Grabowski, 19 March 2017
  14. wPolityce.pl Ważna refleksja dr. Gontarczyka: "Nie ma wątpliwości, że zbrodnia w Jedwabnem była przede wszystkim skutkiem nawiedzenia tych ziem przez dwa totalitaryzmy"
  15. "Jan Grabowski – Judenjagd. Polowanie na Żydów 1942-1945" – recenzja Łukasz Męczykowski
  16. "Judenjagd – 'umiejętne działanie' czy zbrodnicza perfidia?", Dzieje Najnowsze: kwartalnik poświęcony historii XX wieku, published by the Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences, vol. 43, no. 2, 2011.
  17. Rżnięcie nożem po omacku, czyli polemika historyczna a la Bogdan Musiał, Dzieje Najnowsze, Jan Grabowski, 2011
  18. Himka, John-Paul. "Hunt for the Jews: Betrayal and Murder in German-Occupied Poland.", East European Jewish Affairs, (2014): 271-273.
  19. Redlich, Shimon, "Hunt for the Jews: Betrayal and Murder in German-Occupied Poland, by Grabowski, Jan, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 2013", Slavic Review, 73.3 (2014), pp. 652-53.
  20. Hunt for the Jews: Betrayal and Murder in German-Occupied Poland, by Jan Grabowski (review), Joshua D. Zimmerman, The Journal of Modern History, vol. 88, no. 1, March 2016.
  21. JAN GRABOWSKI. Hunt for the Jews: Betrayal and Murder in German-Occupied Poland (review), Rosa Lehmann, The American Historical Review, vol. 121, issue 4 (1 October 2016), pp. 1382–83.
  22. , Michael Fleming, European History Quarterly, pp. 357-9, April 11, 2016.
  23. Ray, Larry (Winter 2014). "Review". Holocaust Studies: A Journal of Culture & History. 20 Issue 3: 204–208.
  24. Hitler’s Logical Holocaust, Timothy D. Snyder, New York Review of Books, 20 Dec 2012
  25. ^ "Stanowczo sprzeciwiamy się działalności i wypowiedziom Jana Grabowskiego". OŚWIADCZENIE W Polityce.pl
  26. The truth about Poland, Legion Magazine, Stephen J. Thorne, 14 Feb 2018
  27. A Polish Historian's Accounting of the Holocaust Divides His Countrymen, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 25 June 2012
  28. Historians defend prof who wrote of Poles’ Holocaust complicity, Times of Israel (JTA), 13 June 2017
  29. International historians defend Ottawa scholar who studies Poland and Holocaust, Vanessa Gera, The Associated Press, 20 June 2017
  30. "Poland's Dueling Holocaust Monuments to 'Righteous Gentiles' Spark Painful Debate", Forward, 27 April 2014.
  31. "Poland Plans Monument to Righteous Gentiles on Site of Warsaw Ghetto", Forward, 17 April 2013.
  32. "Polish Museum Honoring Poles Who Saved Jews Arouses Controversy", Haaretz, 22 March 2016.
  33. POLISH HISTORIAN: PENALTIES FOR NEW POLISH LAW RESEMBLE PRE-WAR PUNISHMENT, 20 Feb. 2018, Jerusalem Post.
  34. Polish Historian: Entering Dialogue With Poland on Holocaust Bill Is 'The Last Thing' Israel Should Do, Haaretz, 19 Feb. 2018

External links

Categories: