| Revision as of 21:30, 26 March 2018 editJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,091 editsm →Editing other's text: fmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:40, 26 March 2018 edit undoColin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,958 edits →Editing other's text: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| Do not ever edit my talk page text again. I can summarise my own opening post to a lengthy discussion. I have added a signature to clarify that it is my summary. -- ]°] 18:05, 26 March 2018 (UTC) | Do not ever edit my talk page text again. I can summarise my own opening post to a lengthy discussion. I have added a signature to clarify that it is my summary. -- ]°] 18:05, 26 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
| : Do not ever add a '''bold tendentious summary above text others have already commented''' on again. Oh, and also? Go away you boring person. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 21:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC) | : Do not ever add a '''bold tendentious summary above text others have already commented''' on again. Oh, and also? Go away you boring person. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 21:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ::Wow, are you twelve? Misplaced Pages has gone way way downhill. -- ]°] 21:40, 26 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:40, 26 March 2018
←
Centralized discussion
- Refining the administrator elections process
- Blocks for promotional activity outside of mainspace
- Voluntary RfAs after resignation
Allowing recreation of the page of the physicist Lorenzo Iorio
Hello. Sorry if I bother you here: I am not sure it is the right venue, but I found difficult to sort out where I could do it better. I am contacting you about the case of the italian physicist Lorenzo Iorio. I think that an article on him should be present in Misplaced Pages. He has over 3200 citations (non-self citations), as per NASA/ADS database, a h-index of 39 (NASA/ADS source), he was cited several times by the Nobel prize 2006 George F. Smoot who is enlisted in the editorial board of a peer-reviewed journal, Universe, directed by Iorio himself. Also the Nobel Prize Kip Thorne cited a work of him in his latest book, and Sir Roger Penrose is enlisted in the editorial board of the journal directed by him. It seems to me that its page was deleted because of sockpuppetry issues, not for truly scientific reasons. Thank you for the attention. Regards. Redwheel (talk) 20:39, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- Did he ask you to do this? You have very few edits and this article was re-created many times by accounts with little or no other purpose. I conclude from the evidence that he is desperate to have a page and will do whatever he needs to get one. Guy (Help!) 09:55, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hello. Thank you for your reply, which I find unsatisfactory. Indeed, it is as if you have some form of personal conflict of interest with hime, or you are, for some reasons, personally biased against him. Indeed, you did not use arguments pertinent to the issue as his notability, scientific merits, etc. Can you explain me, please? Regards.Redwheel (talk) 10:57, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- We are done here. Guy (Help!) 12:08, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- I've never understood why some academics so badly want an article. It won't get them more grants, and it won't help them get published in Science or Nature. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 13:23, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- We are done here. Guy (Help!) 12:08, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hello. Thank you for your reply, which I find unsatisfactory. Indeed, it is as if you have some form of personal conflict of interest with hime, or you are, for some reasons, personally biased against him. Indeed, you did not use arguments pertinent to the issue as his notability, scientific merits, etc. Can you explain me, please? Regards.Redwheel (talk) 10:57, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Deletion review for Lorenzo Iorio
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Lorenzo Iorio. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
Saylor and MIT
Hi Guy, I saw you snipped out the detail about Michael J. Saylor's graduating position from his biographical article earlier today. I don't know if you're aware this detail was added after extensive discussion on the talk page early this month. (FYI, I have a financial COI with this topic, as I'm working with Mr. Saylor's company, so I will not edit directly.) My initial request was to replace only the detail about his "top 1%" graduating position; a different editor added the bit about Mr. Saylor being a "hard worker" to which I am not overly attached. Would you be willing to restore the 1% detail? It's properly sourced and not an insignificant accomplishment. If so, I think it would fit well in the first clause of the sentence giving his graduation date. Thanks for your consideration. WWB Too (Talk · COI) 15:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yes I am aware. It is a bit of resume-padding trivial that has no place on Misplaced Pages. Those of us who edit Misplaced Pages for love, tend to have a different view of promotional content to those who try to profit from a charitably funded volunteer-run project. For obvious reasons. Guy (Help!) 17:47, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Editing other's text
Do not ever edit my talk page text again. I can summarise my own opening post to a lengthy discussion. I have added a signature to clarify that it is my summary. -- Colin° 18:05, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Do not ever add a bold tendentious summary above text others have already commented on again. Oh, and also? Go away you boring person. Guy (Help!) 21:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Wow, are you twelve? Misplaced Pages has gone way way downhill. -- Colin° 21:40, 26 March 2018 (UTC)