Revision as of 23:35, 23 October 2006 editSrkris (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,825 editsm →Subjectivity: hmm← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:46, 24 October 2006 edit undoVenu62 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,773 edits This article hasn't been assessed as yetNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WP India|class= |
{{WP India|class=|importance=|auto=yes}} | ||
{{WPBiography | {{WPBiography | ||
|living=no | |living=no | ||
|class= |
|class= | ||
|priority=High | |priority=High | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 02:46, 24 October 2006
India Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Biography Unassessed | |||||||
|
Subjectivity
Not the neutral objective language of an encyclopedic article, more a subjective piece of adulation. Needs a little copy-editing. Citations, and links to terminology entries would also improve the article.
Went through last night, and added a whole raft of cross-links. Could probably do with some proof-reading and cross-checking to ensure that the links are correct in the case of multiple possibilities.
Now its almost entirely rewritten in a near-neutral language. I'm considering putting it up for GA assessment.-- ॐ Kris 16:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Not neutral enough, I'd suggest. The opening paragraph contains the following: "...powerful voice and majestic singing, which catapulted him to instant fame...". "powerful", "majestic", "catapulted" all very subjective words, and no citation for any of them.
- "It is said that..." Said by whom? Where? Verified how?
- "...was a highly respected musician." Respected by whom? Documented where?
- The article is still in need of some attention, added to whch a lot of the references that were cited before have now disappeared and need to be re-sourced. Cain Mosni 20:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi Cain, thanks for the feedback... I agree there's still much scope for improvement. Please let me know about other specific issues that I have to address to better it.-- ॐ Kris ( talk | contribs) 23:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Fancruft
This article is nothing but an outpourings of an ardant fan. This needs a total rewrite for tone, facts and neutrality. - Parthi 23:03, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Read WP:MOS for help in writing WP articles and on encyclopedic style.- Parthi 23:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Yeah thanks a million for the idea.-- ॐ Kris ( talk | contribs) 23:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- You are welcome. No go and rewrite the article with a more neutral style. Or I will do it for you. Make sure you get copyright permission from the rasikas.org website. Oh, sorry I forgot. it is your own website isn't it! - Parthi 23:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
To use an aussie expression, don't get your knickers in a knot over this. You can make edits on Misplaced Pages, the article doesnt belong to me, and I cant be bothered by trite messages-- ॐ Kris ( talk | contribs) 23:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Categories: