| Revision as of 10:33, 6 April 2018 editCinteotl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,603 edits →Mass shootings in the United States: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:38, 6 April 2018 edit undoCinteotl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,603 edits →Alert: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| Please self-revert. Thanks. ] (]) 10:33, 6 April 2018 (UTC) | Please self-revert. Thanks. ] (]) 10:33, 6 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
| == Alert == | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The ] has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| I don't believe you've been alerted to this in the last 12 months. ] (]) 10:38, 6 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:38, 6 April 2018
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This is my talk page, you can post any comments you have below this line...§§§§§§§§§§
A page you started (1996 Kamianske tram accident) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating 1996 Kamianske tram accident, Undescribed!
Misplaced Pages editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This is a very informative article. For me, it looked as if the brakes had only failed at the bottom of the hill, although I assume that the break failure had already occured before, resulting in the excessive speed.
To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
February 2018
Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made a change to an article, August 25, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The statistics you added to that DOY page conflict with those in the article about the hurricane. Toddst1 (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- I'm very sorry that you've been templated by this user. You've been around here almost as long as he has, so you've certainly earned the right to be spoken to politely and personally rather than via a patronising template. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- Infobox in Hurricane Harvey says "Fatalities 69 direct, 39 indirect". Your unsourced unsourced edit to September 10 contradicts that saying 146 fatalities. Please fix this contradiction since you've proceeded to edit war on it.
- Beyond that, you're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. Toddst1 (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- For Harvey on August 25th, 69+39 = 108. For Irma on September 10, 66+80 = 146. Besides this, I don't see why WP:V is only applicable to additions, but not old entries. Why should old entries remain unsourced, but new entries require a source? Also, as stated by User:The Rambling Man, the patronizing isn't appreciated as I have earned my right to be spoken to politely. Cheers Undescribed (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- I agree that it's completely hypocritical to start removing items and templating experienced editors while leaving every single other entry in every single article unreferenced, and simply add empty References sections. No use, no help, not beneficial to our readers, and damaging to our editors. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- For Harvey on August 25th, 69+39 = 108. For Irma on September 10, 66+80 = 146. Besides this, I don't see why WP:V is only applicable to additions, but not old entries. Why should old entries remain unsourced, but new entries require a source? Also, as stated by User:The Rambling Man, the patronizing isn't appreciated as I have earned my right to be spoken to politely. Cheers Undescribed (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
reliable sources saved to Internet Archive
reliable sources saved to Internet Archive
69.181.23.220 (talk) 10:18, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Terrorism in the United States
As you can see in my edit summary, the article is about terrorism by non-state actors, and Sand Creek was a military operation. I love Peter La Farge's song "The Crimson Parson" by the way. Anyway, I see more like it and I've raised the issue of removing those at the talk page. Doug Weller talk 10:56, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Mass shootings in the United States
In your reversion of my edit ,you said "There's nothing wrong with ranking."
I agree. Nothing wrong at all. If you have a reliable source for it.
This has already been discussed at length on the talk page, with no one even suggesting they have a reliable source.
Please self-revert. Thanks. Cinteotl (talk) 10:33, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Alert
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.I don't believe you've been alerted to this in the last 12 months. Cinteotl (talk) 10:38, 6 April 2018 (UTC)