Revision as of 17:40, 24 October 2006 editVinceB (talk | contribs)1,493 edits →Blocked for 1 week← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:41, 24 October 2006 edit undoVinceB (talk | contribs)1,493 edits →Blocked for 1 weekNext edit → | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:The deletion of your request at ] was done by an uninvolved editor in good standing, who explained the decision in the edit note ''removed trolling.'' I reviewed that user's last 500 edits and saw nothing about Hungarian nationalism, but did see numerous housekeeping edits to various pages. ''']''' 17:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | :The deletion of your request at ] was done by an uninvolved editor in good standing, who explained the decision in the edit note ''removed trolling.'' I reviewed that user's last 500 edits and saw nothing about Hungarian nationalism, but did see numerous housekeeping edits to various pages. ''']''' 17:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
Then how to dissolve this problem if I can't write it there? Where to ask for? Note, that I am able to play out the block(s), but I never did it. I always made '''referenced edits''', I ''showed my references'' to those two also, see their discussion pages. I several times clearly proved how misleading their interpretations of this situation, and the describing of me, and my behaviour. Thus, I'm the one, who's edit waring... those two not even warned. --] 17:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | Then how to dissolve this problem if I can't write it there? Where to ask for? Note, that I am able to play out the block(s), but I never did it. I always made '''referenced edits''', I ''showed my references'' to those two also, see their discussion pages. I several times clearly proved how misleading their interpretations of this situation, and the describing of me, and my behaviour. Thus, I'm the one, who's edit waring and adding nonsense (sic!)... those two not even warned. Or at least asked for a source to verify their statements... --] 17:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:41, 24 October 2006
This page is rubber frendly.
Segitség
Juro megint akaratoskodik. Letörölte az írásomat a Administrative divisions of the Kingdom of Hungary-ról, és mindezt magarázat nélkül (jellemzö rá). Kérlek segíts! Öcsi 19:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
VinceB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hey, stop this, please, and please take the time to understand the ongoing situation. I've already asked for a third opinion, but it was deleted. How to dissolve this, if all of my tryings on talk pages are ingnored/deleted, and I got blocked? Yo do not even wait for my replies. What a malicious method! On the other hand, those two are why not blocked for edit waring? Thus not me was the one, who started. See dates. I several times proved, the slides abt me before, but you still believe those, instead of the facts How many more times should I prove them to believe me (the facts) ???Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hey, stop this, please, and please take the time to understand the ongoing situation. I've already asked for a third opinion, but it was deleted. How to dissolve this, if all of my tryings on talk pages are ingnored/deleted, and I got blocked? Yo do not even wait for my replies. What a malicious method! On the other hand, those two are why not blocked for edit waring? Thus not me was the one, who started. See dates. I several times proved, the slides abt me before, but you still believe those, instead of the facts How many more times should I prove them to believe me (the facts) ??? |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hey, stop this, please, and please take the time to understand the ongoing situation. I've already asked for a third opinion, but it was deleted. How to dissolve this, if all of my tryings on talk pages are ingnored/deleted, and I got blocked? Yo do not even wait for my replies. What a malicious method! On the other hand, those two are why not blocked for edit waring? Thus not me was the one, who started. See dates. I several times proved, the slides abt me before, but you still believe those, instead of the facts How many more times should I prove them to believe me (the facts) ??? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hey, stop this, please, and please take the time to understand the ongoing situation. I've already asked for a third opinion, but it was deleted. How to dissolve this, if all of my tryings on talk pages are ingnored/deleted, and I got blocked? Yo do not even wait for my replies. What a malicious method! On the other hand, those two are why not blocked for edit waring? Thus not me was the one, who started. See dates. I several times proved, the slides abt me before, but you still believe those, instead of the facts How many more times should I prove them to believe me (the facts) ??? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
On the other hand, you may edit the page also. It's not mine. But note, the far right is very very divided, and often hates each other. (for ex: Bonehead & Skinhead) An MIÉP and Jobbik and other ("real") nationalist parties describe fidesz as leftist and more often treasonous party (no need to go further you can read it on the front page of the MIÉP, for ex) On the third hand, I am concerned, that you and (Tankred also) are mixing patriotism with nationalism, since the first one is not an established concept in Central Europe, and frequently mixed with nationalism. --VinceB 17:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Blocked for 1 week
Since the last block expired you've done very little other than blank my previous block notice, resume edit warring, and lodge block a request at WP:3O against other editors. If other editors do behave improperly then you're welcome to post a request in the usual places such as WP:AN/I and WP:PAIN. However, your actions have the appearance of a retaliatory attempt at petitioning unfamiliar administrators to block particular editors and of attempting to disguise your own history of warnings and blocks.
Blocks tend to get longer and more frequent when objectionable behavior continues with no sign of improvement. Per Misplaced Pages:Disruptive editing, you could be subject to a topic ban or site ban if this goes on. I recommend you seek a mentor from Misplaced Pages:Mentorship. The topics where you edit seem to be important to you and I'd rather see you develop into a productive editor. Respectfully, Durova 17:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- The deletion of your request at WP:3O was done by an uninvolved editor in good standing, who explained the decision in the edit note removed trolling. I reviewed that user's last 500 edits and saw nothing about Hungarian nationalism, but did see numerous housekeeping edits to various pages. Durova 17:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Then how to dissolve this problem if I can't write it there? Where to ask for? Note, that I am able to play out the block(s), but I never did it. I always made referenced edits, I showed my references to those two also, see their discussion pages. I several times clearly proved how misleading their interpretations of this situation, and the describing of me, and my behaviour. Thus, I'm the one, who's edit waring and adding nonsense (sic!)... those two not even warned. Or at least asked for a source to verify their statements... --VinceB 17:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Category: