User talk:Rhian2040: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 22:03, 7 April 2018 editRhian2040 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users1,768 edits Why I shouldn't be banned← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:05, 7 April 2018 edit undoAmortias (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators33,899 edits →Discretionary sanctions: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert Next edit →
Line 34:		Line 34:

	{{unblock\|reason=Myself and other users have repeatedly asked @IOnlyKnowFiveWords to stop deleting candidates off of the 2020 US Election article that have met the requirements to be "potential candidates". He has said there are rules, and we have listened and played by those rules, yet he still continues to undermine the article. I have reverted his acts vandalism back repeatedly}}		{{unblock\|reason=Myself and other users have repeatedly asked @IOnlyKnowFiveWords to stop deleting candidates off of the 2020 US Election article that have met the requirements to be "potential candidates". He has said there are rules, and we have listened and played by those rules, yet he still continues to undermine the article. I have reverted his acts vandalism back repeatedly}}

			== Discretionary sanctions ==

			{{Ivm\|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''

			'''Please carefully read this information:'''

			The ] has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ].

			Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
			}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->

Revision as of 22:05, 7 April 2018

Welcome!

Hello, Rhian2040, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Mark Cuban. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 12:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Recently Uploaded Photos

I've done reverse Google Image Searches on several of these photos and it would appear that you have added a lot of images that are not your work despite you claiming the rights to said work. I cannot speak for if each work is eligible to be on Misplaced Pages under another license (yet), but I'd strongly encourage you to stop.--Mpen320 (talk) 01:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

My apologies, I thought that screenshoting images, counted as copyright free, I don't intentionally try to do this.

No Harm, no foul.--Mpen320 (talk) 02:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United States presidential election, 2020. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amortias (T)(C) 21:37, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Myself and other users have repeatedly asked @IOnlyKnowFiveWords to stop deleting candidates off of the 2020 US Election article that have met the requirements to be "potential candidates". He has said there are rules, and we have listened and played by those rules, yet he still continues to undermine the article. I have reverted his acts vandalism back repeatedly.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at United_States_presidential_election,_2020. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Amortias (T)(C) 21:57, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Rhian2040 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Myself and other users have repeatedly asked @IOnlyKnowFiveWords to stop deleting candidates off of the 2020 US Election article that have met the requirements to be "potential candidates". He has said there are rules, and we have listened and played by those rules, yet he still continues to undermine the article. I have reverted his acts vandalism back repeatedly |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Myself and other users have repeatedly asked @IOnlyKnowFiveWords to stop deleting candidates off of the 2020 US Election article that have met the requirements to be "potential candidates". He has said there are rules, and we have listened and played by those rules, yet he still continues to undermine the article. I have reverted his acts vandalism back repeatedly |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Myself and other users have repeatedly asked @IOnlyKnowFiveWords to stop deleting candidates off of the 2020 US Election article that have met the requirements to be "potential candidates". He has said there are rules, and we have listened and played by those rules, yet he still continues to undermine the article. I have reverted his acts vandalism back repeatedly |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Discretionary sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33

Category:

Requests for unblock