Misplaced Pages

Talk:Alt-right: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:05, 22 April 2018 editAquillion (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,846 edits Edit← Previous edit Revision as of 03:19, 22 April 2018 edit undo80.41.65.42 (talk) I am adding mention of an important sub-current of the Alt Right and white nationalism generally.Next edit →
Line 61: Line 61:
{{out}} Yeah, I object to it, which is why I reverted it. Why did I revert it? Well, it sucked. It didn't improve the article in pretty many '''''any''''' respect, along the lines that Grayfell posted above.}}] (]) 23:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC) {{out}} Yeah, I object to it, which is why I reverted it. Why did I revert it? Well, it sucked. It didn't improve the article in pretty many '''''any''''' respect, along the lines that Grayfell posted above.}}] (]) 23:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
:As others have said, I think that it's doing too much in one edit on a really controversial article... but with that said, it might be worth breaking up the ideas in it and discussing each one individually. I think a conspiracy theory section might be useful, although we'd have to discuss where to put it. And as for the connection between conspiracy theories and memes in the Alt-Right, discusses it in a really useful way, although ideally we'd want more than that. That source in particular seems like the ideal sort of thing we'd look for, though, in that it goes into depth on how prominent Alt-Right accounts push conspiracy theories into the mainstream. It's worth noting that many scholars and journalists seem to use the word "meme" to refer to any pushed hashtag, which is probably slightly differently than many of us use it. Either way, this article should definitely say more about Pizzagate, which has been a major point of coverage and research when it comes to the Alt-Right. --] (]) 00:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC) :As others have said, I think that it's doing too much in one edit on a really controversial article... but with that said, it might be worth breaking up the ideas in it and discussing each one individually. I think a conspiracy theory section might be useful, although we'd have to discuss where to put it. And as for the connection between conspiracy theories and memes in the Alt-Right, discusses it in a really useful way, although ideally we'd want more than that. That source in particular seems like the ideal sort of thing we'd look for, though, in that it goes into depth on how prominent Alt-Right accounts push conspiracy theories into the mainstream. It's worth noting that many scholars and journalists seem to use the word "meme" to refer to any pushed hashtag, which is probably slightly differently than many of us use it. Either way, this article should definitely say more about Pizzagate, which has been a major point of coverage and research when it comes to the Alt-Right. --] (]) 00:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

== Alt Left as the 'Left' of the Alt Right ==

Alt Left and Alternative Left are also terms used to describe: (i). the left-wing of the Alt Right and (ii). a leftist meta-political approach to white nationalism. For sources on this, see: , , . There is also a strong 'hipster racist' culture within the broader current of white nationalism that could be described as falling under the Alt Left sensibility: see for instance, . This, I appreciate, is all quite fringe and obscure and merits only a brief paragraph, but it is important and may grow in importance as white nationalism evolves and tries to broader its appeal. I can draft a relatively brief paragraph and post it here for consideration and possible inclusion by an accredited editor, but I await agreement on this. I can't just go ahead and post something as the article itself is 'semi-locked' and inaccessible to me. Thank you.

Revision as of 03:19, 22 April 2018

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alt-right article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Alt-right. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Alt-right at the Reference desk.
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 10 May 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPolitics: American Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconConservatism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 Template:WikiProject Donald Trump
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconSociology Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconLinguistics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconCulture Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Presidential elections Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).
Stop Normalizing Alt Right Chrome extension was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 January 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Alt-right. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
The contents of the Alt-left page were merged into Alt-right on September 26 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alt-right article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22Auto-archiving period: 30 days 

Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18
Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21
Archive 22


This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

MotherJones and Breitbart Dispute the Ideology

The article offers no source for, Bannon described Breitbart as 'the platform for the alt-right', with the goal of promoting the ideology. The quote is properly sourced from the MotherJones article but there is nothing to substantiate the claim that Bannon or Breitbart have a goal of promoting the ideology; certainly not the ideology as defined by MotherJones or this Misplaced Pages article. Indeed, on 16-Aug-2017 in response to the MotherJones article, Tony Lee at Breitbart flatly denied that the website is alt-right and offered up a Harvard/MIT study as proof. Lee goes on to explain that Posner and Bannon had different definitions of alt-right ideology when Bannon noted “we’re the platform for the alt-right." Lee writes:

Bannon’s “alt-right” comment indicates he apparently thought it consisted mainly of computer gamers and blue-collar voters who hated the GOP brand associated with George W. Bush’s brand of “conservatism” or “Bushism” that sought nation-building adventures abroad while allowing crony capitalism to fester in D.C.

A description of this dispute and Tony Lee's editorial should be added to this Misplaced Pages article. The phrase, promoting the ideology, should be removed or at least marked, citation needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamfrantz (talkcontribs) 18:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Breitbart is not a reliable source. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:52, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
WP:ABOUTSELF Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves --Emir of Misplaced Pages (talk) 21:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Nope, since they have something to gain by it, they are not reliable, even about themselves. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:02, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Exactly. I have no idea why so many editors don't understand this important aspect of our policies.- MrX 🖋 00:10, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
When did Misplaced Pages become a far-left echo chamber? 108.27.16.253 (talk) 04:44, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Never has been, never will be. Nor will it ever be a propaganda outlet for the far right, the alt-right, or neo-Nazis, try as they might to make it into one. Nope, our policies makes sure of that, which is why we follow them as strictly as we possible can. And one of our policies is that article talk pages are WP:NOTAFORUM for general discussion, they exist to help improve the article. So, with that in mind, what are your suggestions for improving the article, aside from, say, copying text from Breitbart wholesale into it? Do you have any real suggestions, or are you just going to spout right-wing nonsense? Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:33, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Conservatism sidebar

Should the conservatism sidebar be listed in this article? The alt-right predominately hates conservatism to my knowledge, it's more reactionary than anything. FlowerRoad (talk) 01:30, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

I removed it.– Lionel 08:43, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Edit

Does anyone object to this change?

FlowerRoad (talk) 20:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

I wouldn't really call that a change, I would say that it was many changes lumped together in a single edit. That makes it pretty hard to answer the question. Some of these changes seem very helpful, but at a glance I would object to the creation of additional very short subsections. The article should be an overview of the larger movement, and this expansion is a step in the wrong direction. Grayfell (talk) 22:07, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Would you be okay with a conspiracy theory section + Pizzagate picture? That was the main "meat" of the edit anyway. I thought that the images would also clarify the text. For the subsections themselves, it is not something I would strongly object to. FlowerRoad (talk) 22:34, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Why are conspiracy theories being tied to memes? What's the connection? There are many sources connecting the alt-right to multiple conspiracy theories, but the two sources used seem very weak for supporting an entire subsection. I'm not saying they aren't reliable, just not necessarily WP:DUE based on context. The Hatewatch article barely mentions the alt-right, and the Hyperallergic article doesn't mention "alt-right" at all, instead using "far-right". It also predates the QAnon stuff.
The picture could be appropriate once the article provides enough well-sourced context to explain it. Adding a photo to support a single-sentence subsection is lopsided, to put it mildly. Without this context, it is more confusing than informative. Grayfell (talk) 22:58, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, I object to it, which is why I reverted it. Why did I revert it? Well, it sucked. It didn't improve the article in pretty many any respect, along the lines that Grayfell posted above.}}

As others have said, I think that it's doing too much in one edit on a really controversial article... but with that said, it might be worth breaking up the ideas in it and discussing each one individually. I think a conspiracy theory section might be useful, although we'd have to discuss where to put it. And as for the connection between conspiracy theories and memes in the Alt-Right, this source discusses it in a really useful way, although ideally we'd want more than that. That source in particular seems like the ideal sort of thing we'd look for, though, in that it goes into depth on how prominent Alt-Right accounts push conspiracy theories into the mainstream. It's worth noting that many scholars and journalists seem to use the word "meme" to refer to any pushed hashtag, which is probably slightly differently than many of us use it. Either way, this article should definitely say more about Pizzagate, which has been a major point of coverage and research when it comes to the Alt-Right. --Aquillion (talk) 00:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Alt Left as the 'Left' of the Alt Right

Alt Left and Alternative Left are also terms used to describe: (i). the left-wing of the Alt Right and (ii). a leftist meta-political approach to white nationalism. For sources on this, see: , , . There is also a strong 'hipster racist' culture within the broader current of white nationalism that could be described as falling under the Alt Left sensibility: see for instance, . This, I appreciate, is all quite fringe and obscure and merits only a brief paragraph, but it is important and may grow in importance as white nationalism evolves and tries to broader its appeal. I can draft a relatively brief paragraph and post it here for consideration and possible inclusion by an accredited editor, but I await agreement on this. I can't just go ahead and post something as the article itself is 'semi-locked' and inaccessible to me. Thank you.

Categories: