| Revision as of 12:20, 22 April 2018 editMohanbhan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,875 edits r← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:20, 22 April 2018 edit undoCapitals00 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers9,265 edits →BanjaraNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| :I agree that I may have acted a bit hastily, and I am sorry about it. But Sitush I wish you were a little less acrimonious, and a little more understanding, with your edits and reverts. I know that "colonial sources" are regarded as unreliable on WP, and respecting that, I added a link to the external links section which is very much within WP policy. So when you removed it, I reinstated it by saying it was a document of historical and archival interest -- though I now feel I should have stated WP policy on EL which would have brought the matter to a close. -] (]) 12:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC) | :I agree that I may have acted a bit hastily, and I am sorry about it. But Sitush I wish you were a little less acrimonious, and a little more understanding, with your edits and reverts. I know that "colonial sources" are regarded as unreliable on WP, and respecting that, I added a link to the external links section which is very much within WP policy. So when you removed it, I reinstated it by saying it was a document of historical and archival interest -- though I now feel I should have stated WP policy on EL which would have brought the matter to a close. -] (]) 12:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ::Why you are not making a self-revert if you are really "sorry" or you "" your actions? ] (]) 16:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:20, 22 April 2018
 Archives |
Banjara
You know that you are in breach of WP:BRD at Banjara. You know it because you actually cite it yourself in your edit summary after also being told about it by MBlaze Lightning in their edit summary. You've been around for a long time now and should thus also be familiar with the various special regimes that apply to articles related to India etc, which make actions such as yours problematic.
What is it that you do not understand? - Sitush (talk) 06:51, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- I agree that I may have acted a bit hastily, and I am sorry about it. But Sitush I wish you were a little less acrimonious, and a little more understanding, with your edits and reverts. I know that "colonial sources" are regarded as unreliable on WP, and respecting that, I added a link to the external links section which is very much within WP policy. So when you removed it, I reinstated it by saying it was a document of historical and archival interest -- though I now feel I should have stated WP policy on EL which would have brought the matter to a close. -Mohanbhan (talk) 12:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- Why you are not making a self-revert if you are really "sorry" or you "regret" your actions? Capitals00 (talk) 16:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC)