| Revision as of 22:29, 26 October 2006 editZantastik (talk | contribs)3,410 edits Please read Rfc rules, Black Flag. This is not a forum for debate -- please use article's talk page (LOTS in this case)← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:42, 27 October 2006 edit undoSigmaEpsilon (talk | contribs)Rollbackers2,310 edits The World Can't Wait: Second RfCNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{RFCheader|Politics}} | {{RFCheader|Politics}} | ||
| <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | ||
| **] There is a dispute over whether or not The World Can't Wait should be criticized in the article, and what criticism merits inclusion. 03:42, 27 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]. Are specific claims made in the article "exceptional" per ]? Is it acceptable to link to Southern Poverty Law Center as the only source in each instance? 19:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC) | *]. Are specific claims made in the article "exceptional" per ]? Is it acceptable to link to Southern Poverty Law Center as the only source in each instance? 19:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *]. This seems to be POV content fork. There is already a ] and ] article where the material ought to be. 15:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | *]. This seems to be POV content fork. There is already a ] and ] article where the material ought to be. 15:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:42, 27 October 2006
Shortcut- ]
- Talk:The World Can't Wait#Request for Comment (Second time) There is a dispute over whether or not The World Can't Wait should be criticized in the article, and what criticism merits inclusion. 03:42, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:League of the South#Rfc. Are specific claims made in the article "exceptional" per Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources#Exceptional claims require exceptional evidence? Is it acceptable to link to Southern Poverty Law Center as the only source in each instance? 19:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Fascism and ideology. This seems to be POV content fork. There is already a Italian fascism and fascism article where the material ought to be. 15:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Al-Qaeda#Request for Comment: Use of the term terrorist. This is a dispute over the use of the term terrorist/ism in relation to the Al Qaeda organzation.
- Talk:Views_and_controversies_concerning_Juan_Cole. There is dispute about whether a quotation speculating about what another author speculates about what a third author thinks really belongs on this page. There are also more general disputes on this page about WP:BLP and WP:NPOV issues that could really use some fresh voices.--22:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad#Ahmadinejad_edit.2C_NPOV. In the article about Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in the section about his anti-semitism, there is dispute about whether mentioning Ahmadinejad's relations with Jews Against Zionism is NPOV, leading, or relevant. Robocracy 11:34, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Neil_Bush#Bush-Berezovsky_Ties In an attempt to end an edit war between two other editors, I added proper sources, cleanup, and expansion to an unsourced POV subsection of the Neil Bush article. This did not satisfy one of the parties, who continues to revert all of it. 01:04, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Armenia#Request for Comment:Armenia not located in Europe Is Armenia located in Europe? 01:28, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies#Summary of the issue - Should we disambiguate UK constituency pages with a suffix, even when they don't clash with other articles? 11:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism Many sources claim anarcho-capitalism is a form of anarchism. The title of this article suggests it is not. Therefore POV. However, some maverick editors prevent a title change. 18:13, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:The_World_Can't_Wait#Request_for_Comment Does the link cited on the talk page provide a valid criticism of The World Can't Wait, or not? 18:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Robert Byrd#RfC: Civil Rights Act Edits Does the added emphasis on Robert Byrd's actions against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 give "undue weight" to the issue and violate Misplaced Pages's NPOV and biographies of living persons policies? Furthermore, do the sources used in that section adhere to Misplaced Pages's reliable sources policy? 01:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:American Civil Liberties Union Disagreements over WP, Criticism Section, Original Research, POV, validity of sources, and more. 21:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Greater and Lesser Tunbs#Neutrality Dispute over how the rival territorial claims to these two small islands by Iran and the United Arabic Emirates should be represented. 06:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Norman Lowell This article as well as some related ones could use more input -- in particular, is there anyone out there familiar with the fringe politics of Malta who could help out? In particular, anyone who does not identify themselves directly or indirectly as a National Socialist? 23:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Jeff Gannon Should Category:Courtesans and prostitutes be added to an article about a man who advertised himself as a prostitute on the Internet? 17:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC) correction by another editor - The advertisement was for an "escort" not a "prostitute". 18:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Joseph Massad Should Joseph Massad, an anti-Zionist professor of Middle Eastern Studies at Columbia, be listed in Category:Anti-Semitic people, even though he denies being anti-Semitic? Is the existence of an accusation recorded in a reliable source enough to include someone in this category? Kalkin 13:39, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- Template_talk:LaRouche What should be the criteria for including a biographical article under "people"? One person is on the template who seems marginal, while another is being excluded who seems central. Discussion suggests that the selection of some and exclusion of others may be motivated by POV pushing. 00:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Benjamin H. Freedman -- a dispute about sources. One editor claims that extremist and "nutcase" sites are not reliable sources for any information whatsoever; another editor disagrees. 23:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)