Misplaced Pages

Talk:America: Imagine the World Without Her: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:56, 15 March 2018 editTrivialist (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers208,532 edits {{skiptotalk}}← Previous edit Revision as of 04:54, 7 May 2018 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,517 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:America: Imagine the World Without Her/Archive 11) (botNext edit →
Line 60: Line 60:
* *
::hmm, i thought WMD and theblaze were both blacklisted... -- ] 03:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC) ::hmm, i thought WMD and theblaze were both blacklisted... -- ] 03:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

== Unreliable Sources for CinemaScore ==

The sources being referenced for this rating by Cinemascore don't meet Misplaced Pages's reliability and verifiability standards. For the same reasoning we don't include sources that link back to Misplaced Pages, these sources are even worse because they don't link to anything at all. Furthermore, from own website: ''"If you can't find your movie, it was not polled by CinemaScore."'' The tags should not be removed until reliable and verifiable sources can substantiate the claim or the claim is removed, as per Misplaced Pages policy.] (]) 07:11, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Upon further research, it appears the claim originated from and no sources are supplied or given to verify the information. Clearly the Cinemascore was never actually published or released.] (]) 07:27, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

:I was going to say to keep it until we can validate it further, but I couldn't find CinemaScore grades for D'Souza's other films either, either on the CinemaScore website or elsewhere online. A little surprised there was no refutation from CinemaScore about this one, especially with a bold "A+" grade claim. Here is the in case more information ever comes out. ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;]) <sup>(])</sup> 13:14, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

:{{ul|Scoobydunk}}, reviewing , it says, ''"Audiences loved the film, giving it a rare 'A+' CinemaScore, and 92 percent gave it a 'definite recommend' in exit polls."'' The second part makes me question taking out the content since it is a rather specific detail. It does not seem likely that CinemaScore never polled audiences, more that for whatever reason, the film is omitted from their database. Perhaps we could re-include the content but leave it out of the lead section and have the ''Film School Rejects'' commentary to pose the question? I may try to message journalists who reported on the grade to see if they can investigate the matter at all. ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;]) <sup>(])</sup> 00:02, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

:Actually, to add on, the article states later on, ''"The audience was split nearly evenly in terms of gender but skewed older, with 69 percent over the age of 55. They were mainly Caucasian (93 percent) and 82 percent of those polled described themselves as 'very or somewhat religious.'"'' This is the kind of demographic detail that CinemaScore provides. I'm even more keen to re-include it since there is less and less doubt that the information is dubious. ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;]) <sup>(])</sup> 00:06, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

::{{ul|Erik}},I appreciate you taking my concerns seriously. How about we adjust the sentence to say "According to Cinemascore exit polling, audiences gave the film an A+ rating, though the score doesn't appear on the Cinemascore website." Then we can put both sources. I'm also fine with dumping the "though the score doesn't appear on the Cinemascore website." though I prefer it. My main concern is that the article doesn't infer the comparison to movies that are actually listed on Cinemascore with an A+ rating since this only seems to be based on exit polling. For whatever reason, the polling didn't make it to the official website and didn't receive an official score from Cinemascore. At least, there's no evidence that it did. Let me know what you think.] (]) 06:36, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:54, 7 May 2018

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the America: Imagine the World Without Her article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 2 months 
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments before commenting.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconFilm: Documentary / American
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconHistory
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited States History
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject United States History To-do:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPolitics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Peace dove with olive branch in its beakPlease stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
Text and/or other creative content from this version of America: Imagine the World Without Her was copied or moved into Draft:America: Imagine the World Without Her with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

References to use

References to use. Erik (talk | contrib) 22:14, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

What specific content are you proposing to add from these? Or are you just aggregating some sources for other editors to use in developing proposals? VictorD7 (talk) 18:22, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm just listing references that could potentially be used here. I find that over time, references can be harder to find if one does not know what to look for. It's easier to list them as they appear. I'm doing the same thing with Wolf Totem (film); see Talk:Wolf Totem (film)#References to use. Erik (talk | contrib) 18:26, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
In that case, do you mind if I add some to the list, starting with these (added below)? VictorD7 (talk) 19:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
hmm, i thought WMD and theblaze were both blacklisted... -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Categories: