Revision as of 13:38, 27 October 2006 view source129.137.88.151 (talk) →Flavors of failure← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:22, 27 October 2006 view source 218.186.8.10 (talk) Revert sneaky vandalism.Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT ] | |||
{{wiktionarypar|failure}} | |||
{{dablink|For other senses of this word, see ].}} | |||
'''Failure''' (or '''flop''') in general refers to the state or ] of not meeting a desirable or intended objective. It may be viewed as the opposite of ]. | |||
==Criteria for failure== | |||
The criteria for failure are heavily dependent on context of use, and may be ] to a particular ] or ]. A situation considered to be a failure by one might be considered a success by another, particularly in cases of direct ] or a ] ]. As well, the degree of success or failure in a situation may be differently viewed by distinct observers or participants, such that a situation that one considers to be a failure, another might consider to be a success, a qualified success or a neutral situation. | |||
It may also be difficult or impossible to ascertain whether a situation meets criteria for failure or success due to ambiguous or ill-defined definition of those criteria. Finding useful and effective criteria, or ], to judge the success or failure of a situation may itself be a significant task. | |||
==Flavors of failure== | |||
Failure can be differentially perceived from the viewpoints of the evaluators. A person who is only interested in the final outcome of an activity would consider it to be an ''Outcome Failure'' if the core issue has not been resolved or a core need is not met. A failure can also be a ''process failure'' whereby although the activity is completed successfully, a person may still feel dissatisfied if the underlying process is perceived to be below expected standard or benchmark. You must be a Democrat to be a failure. | |||
] lists two reasons why a ] can ]: | |||
#failure to ], | |||
#failure to ]. | |||
==Commercial failures== | |||
A '''commercial failure''' is a ] that does not reach expectations of success, failing to come even close. A major flop goes one step further and is recognized for its complete lack of success. | |||
Most of the items listed below had high expectations, significant financial investments, and/or widespread publicity, but fell far short of success. Obviously, due to the subjective nature of "success" and "meeting expectations", there can be disagreement about what constitutes a "major flop." | |||
*For a list of miscellaneous commercial product and service failures, see ]. | |||
*For flops in computer and video gaming, see ]. | |||
<!-- *For flops within the automotive industry, see ]. --> | |||
*For flops concerning ], see ]. | |||
*For ]-related flops, see ]. | |||
*For ]al commercial failures, see ]. | |||
*For company failures related to the 1997–2001 ], see ]. | |||
*See also ]. | |||
==Other failures== | |||
*For military disasters, see ] | |||
*For events that were highly anticipated but either did not happen or turned out to be disappointing, see ]. | |||
*For flops in entertainment, see ]. | |||
*For flops in sports, see ]. | |||
==References== | |||
* Lansdowne, Bridget L.M. ''BOOM, BUST, BANG!: A History of American Failures''. Staskin Mellville-Organization Press, 2004. ISBN ?. | |||
* Charles Perrow, ''Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies'', New Tork: Basic Books, 1984. Paperback reprint, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999, ISBN 0-691-00412-9 | |||
* Sandage, Scott A. ''Born Losers: A History of Failure in America''. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2005. ISBN 067401510X, ISBN 067402107X. | |||
==See also== | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==External links== | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* , Comic strip featuring the ups and downs (mostly the latter) of IT consulting | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Revision as of 14:22, 27 October 2006
Redirect to: