Misplaced Pages

:Copyright problems/2018 May 10: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:08, 11 May 2018 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,556,895 editsm Substing templates: {{Spa}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.← Previous edit Revision as of 21:02, 11 May 2018 edit undoNadirAli (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,436 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
{{ping|Justlettersandnumbers}} Noticed this while I was here and Capitals00's assertions fall flat at the first look. The first source is about Nasir Ali: . However the statements about Nasir Khan in the recent restored version of the article has little in common with it. See this: . There seems to be a usage of copyvio claims just for undoing others. ] (]) 14:17, 11 May 2018 (UTC) <small>— ] (]) has made ] outside this topic. </small> {{ping|Justlettersandnumbers}} Noticed this while I was here and Capitals00's assertions fall flat at the first look. The first source is about Nasir Ali: . However the statements about Nasir Khan in the recent restored version of the article has little in common with it. See this: . There seems to be a usage of copyvio claims just for undoing others. ] (]) 14:17, 11 May 2018 (UTC) <small>— ] (]) has made ] outside this topic. </small>
:Why don't you log into your account? I am talking about and earlier ones are even worse. Your deliberate misrepresentation won't justify copyright violation. ] (]) 15:21, 11 May 2018 (UTC) :Why don't you log into your account? I am talking about and earlier ones are even worse. Your deliberate misrepresentation won't justify copyright violation. ] (]) 15:21, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
::As far as i know inserting quotes inside the citations are not copyvio, i picked this habit up from kautilya3 who does the same on many pages . if it is considered a copyvio by the admins then i was not aware of that, if admins find it a copyvio then i will avoid it in future.--] (]) 21:02, 11 May 2018 (UTC)


<!--- extended argument by numerous editors moved to the article talk-page. Please do not continue your dispute here. Thank you!---> <!--- extended argument by numerous editors moved to the article talk-page. Please do not continue your dispute here. Thank you!--->

Revision as of 21:02, 11 May 2018

10 May 2018

Please provide a source for the apparent copyright violation, Capitals00. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
@Justlettersandnumbers: For now I am only mentioning this diff where the user claimed to have fixed the copyright problem after recognizing the warning for copyright violations. Some of the major examples of copyright violations of this diff are: 76 words directly copied from the book, 90 words copied from "Baluchistan was the most.... were non-Muslim", 55 words, 107 words, 65 words, 81 words, 137 words, 180 words, 98 words, 89 words from "The Government of India reached a decision in June 1942...... 3rd June plan", 64 words, 72 words, 92 words, 159 words, 154 words, 73 words from "On hearing the news Khan... state by Pakistan", 137 words from "Realizing that he must act quickly.... on their behalf", 63 words, 77 words. Capitals00 (talk) 11:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

@Justlettersandnumbers: Noticed this while I was here and Capitals00's assertions fall flat at the first look. The first source is about Nasir Ali: . However the statements about Nasir Khan in the recent restored version of the article has little in common with it. See this: . There seems to be a usage of copyvio claims just for undoing others. 140.82.31.154 (talk) 14:17, 11 May 2018 (UTC) — 140.82.31.154 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Why don't you log into your account? I am talking about this version and earlier ones are even worse. Your deliberate misrepresentation won't justify copyright violation. Capitals00 (talk) 15:21, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
As far as i know inserting quotes inside the citations are not copyvio, i picked this habit up from kautilya3 who does the same on many pages org/1947_Poonch_ rebellion#Noteswikipedia.org/1947_Jammu_ massacres#Noteswikipedia.org/1947_ Mirpur_massacre#Notes. if it is considered a copyvio by the admins then i was not aware of that, if admins find it a copyvio then i will avoid it in future.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 21:02, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Good point, Hoppyh! However, that particular image apparently does not reach the Commons:Threshold of originality, so there's no problem here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:39, 11 May 2018 (UTC)