Revision as of 22:37, 17 May 2018 editGsnguy (talk | contribs)364 edits →IUP-TV: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:13, 18 May 2018 edit undoBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,570 edits →Nate is a white ass....: removeNext edit → | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Please read the ] for more information. ] (]) 18:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)}} | Please read the ] for more information. ] (]) 18:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)}} | ||
== Nate is a white ass.... == | |||
Nigger and so is Gladys j Cortez. Tities. | |||
== ] of ] == | == ] of ] == | ||
] | ] |
Revision as of 02:13, 18 May 2018
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Gsnguy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hey, my real name is Louie Jones
Decline reason:
And your point is? — Tiptoety 00:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Gsnguy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I wanted to go back and do test pages? Can you please unblock me?
Decline reason:
Hurling abuse via the talk pages of one of your blocked sockpuppets doesn't exactly make you look good. -- Netsnipe ► 15:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Gsnguy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
LET GSNGUY WATCH APOCALYPSE NOW WITH NATE AND GLADYS J CORTEZ!!! APOCALYPSE NOW!!
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Optimist on the run (talk) 18:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Proposed deletion of IUP-TV
The article IUP-TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 06:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
IUP-TV
@Rusf10: That article was written entirely by IUP Students. That meets article standards. Gsnguy (talk) 22:37, 17 May 2018 (UTC)