Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages/to do: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:38, 19 January 2015 editJarble (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users149,672 edits This article contains a section that is completely duplicated in another article.← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:27, 22 May 2018 edit undo14.139.219.244 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:
	\|npov=		\|npov=
	\|infobox=		\|infobox=
	\|other= *Discuss changing the subject ~~(or just the name)~~ of the article to something a bit broader (e.g. ], ], ], ], ], ], ] etc) (reliability being a more narrow subject, see ]). Discuss overlap with ] and clarify the scope of the two articles.		\|other= *Discuss changing the subject of the article to something a bit broader (e.g. ], ], ], ], ], ], ] etc) (reliability being a more narrow subject, see ]). Discuss overlap with ] and clarify the scope of the two articles.
	}}		}}

Revision as of 01:27, 22 May 2018

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Merge Criticism of Misplaced Pages#Systemic bias in coverage with Reliability of Misplaced Pages#Coverage.
Expand : *Expand lead a little bit - three detailed paragraphs would be good for an article of this length.
- Should there be something on Misplaced Pages assessment of itself - e.g. the assessment scheme, WikiProjects, featured articles, peer review etc?
- Find references where called for
- Other : *Discuss changing the subject of the article to something a bit broader (e.g. quality of Misplaced Pages, quality and comprehensiveness of Misplaced Pages, evaluation of Misplaced Pages, assessment of Misplaced Pages, appraisal of Misplaced Pages, perspectives on Misplaced Pages, reception of Misplaced Pages etc) (reliability being a more narrow subject, see Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages#Article name). Discuss overlap with criticism of Misplaced Pages and clarify the scope of the two articles.