| Revision as of 15:53, 18 December 2017 editMskadu (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,234 edits Warning: Removal of content, blanking on Zaira Wasim. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:48, 25 May 2018 edit undoKrimuk2.0 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers68,582 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on Alia Bhatt. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages without adequate explanation, as you did at ], you may be ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete3 --> ] 15:53, 18 December 2017 (UTC) | ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages without adequate explanation, as you did at ], you may be ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete3 --> ] 15:53, 18 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == May 2018 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 10:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:48, 25 May 2018
June 2017
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Divya Bharti has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Divya Bharti was changed by Aligulla (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929542 on 2017-06-25T20:37:52+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Recent edits to Divya Bharti
Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Divya Bharti article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Misplaced Pages and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:22, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Divya Bharti and DDLJ
Where is your source that she was the first choice to play the heroine in DDLJ? --Kailash29792 (talk) 12:04, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- I cannot find a single credible source that says this, and the credible sources used in the article do not mention it. It is usually in the comment sections. Wishful thinking maybe? Find some reliable sources, or preferably Adtiya himself saying it, and we can add it. Bollyjeff | talk
December 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Zaira Wasim, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:14, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages without adequate explanation, as you did at Zaira Wasim, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. MayureshK 15:53, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
May 2018
Your recent editing history at Alia Bhatt shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC)