| Revision as of 17:28, 23 May 2018 editDrFleischman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,325 edits →May 2018← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:02, 29 May 2018 edit undo74.195.159.155 (talk) →May 2018Next edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| * I understand you had good-faith ] concerns, but you still should have discussed the matter at ]. Edit summaries are not the place to engage in extended arguments. --] (]) 17:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC) | * I understand you had good-faith ] concerns, but you still should have discussed the matter at ]. Edit summaries are not the place to engage in extended arguments. --] (]) 17:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :I'm not sure what edits warrant discussion in Talk and which ones don't, but WP policy says explicitly to not bother with the Talk with contentious information that's not sourced sufficiently. I'm almost certain that if I went the discussion route then the misinformation would still be in the article. I took some concerns to the notice board and got no results or any discussion that took the concerns seriously. | |||
Revision as of 19:02, 29 May 2018
May 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ben Swann. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 16:05, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- I understand you had good-faith WP:BLP concerns, but you still should have discussed the matter at Talk:Ben Swann. Edit summaries are not the place to engage in extended arguments. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what edits warrant discussion in Talk and which ones don't, but WP policy says explicitly to not bother with the Talk with contentious information that's not sourced sufficiently. I'm almost certain that if I went the discussion route then the misinformation would still be in the article. I took some concerns to the notice board and got no results or any discussion that took the concerns seriously.