Misplaced Pages

Mini-Neptune: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:28, 25 February 2018 editMessier8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users507 editsm Assisted by Citation bot← Previous edit Revision as of 01:48, 5 June 2018 edit undoBibcode Bot (talk | contribs)Bots42,789 editsm Adding 0 arxiv eprint(s), 0 bibcode(s), 0 doi(s), and updating 1 bibcode(s). Did it miss something? Report bugs, errors, and suggestions at User talk:Bibcode BotNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''mini-Neptune''' or sub-Neptune (sometimes known as a ] or '''transitional planet''') is a planet of up to 10 ]es ({{Earth mass}}), less massive than ] and ], which have about 14.5 {{Earth mass}} and 17 {{earth mass}}, respectively. Mini-Neptunes have thick ]–] atmospheres, probably with deep layers of ice, rock or liquid oceans (made of ], ], a mixture of both, or heavier volatiles).<ref name=dangelo_bodenheimer_2016>{{cite journal|last=D'Angelo|first=G.|author2= Bodenheimer, P. |title=In Situ and Ex Situ Formation Models of Kepler 11 Planets|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|year=2016|volume=828|issue=1|pages=id. 33|doi=10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/33|arxiv = 1606.08088 |bibcode = 2016arXiv160608088D }}</ref> A '''mini-Neptune''' or sub-Neptune (sometimes known as a ] or '''transitional planet''') is a planet of up to 10 ]es ({{Earth mass}}), less massive than ] and ], which have about 14.5 {{Earth mass}} and 17 {{earth mass}}, respectively. Mini-Neptunes have thick ]–] atmospheres, probably with deep layers of ice, rock or liquid oceans (made of ], ], a mixture of both, or heavier volatiles).<ref name=dangelo_bodenheimer_2016>{{cite journal|last=D'Angelo|first=G.|author2= Bodenheimer, P. |title=In Situ and Ex Situ Formation Models of Kepler 11 Planets|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|year=2016|volume=828|issue=1|pages=id. 33|doi=10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/33|arxiv = 1606.08088 |bibcode = 2016ApJ...828...33D }}</ref>


Theoretical studies of such planets are loosely based on knowledge about Uranus and Neptune. Without a thick atmosphere, it would be classified as an ] instead.<ref>, E.J.W. de Mooij (1), M. Brogi (1), R.J. de Kok (2), J. Koppenhoefer (3,4), S.V. Nefs (1), I.A.G. Snellen (1), J. Greiner (4), J. Hanse (1), R.C. Heinsbroek (1), C.H. Lee (3), P.P. van der Werf (1),</ref> An estimated dividing line between a rocky planet and a gaseous planet is around 1.6-2.0 Earth radii.<ref>, Daniel C. Fabrycky, Jack J. Lissauer, Darin Ragozzine, Jason F. Rowe, Eric Agol, Thomas Barclay, Natalie Batalha, William Borucki, David R. Ciardi, Eric B. Ford, John C. Geary, Matthew J. Holman, Jon M. Jenkins, Jie Li, Robert C. Morehead, Avi Shporer, Jeffrey C. Smith, Jason H. Steffen, Martin Still</ref><ref>, blogs.scientificamerican.com, 20 June 2012</ref> Planets with larger radii and measured masses are mostly low-density and require an extended atmosphere to simultaneously explain their masses and radii, and empirical observations are showing that planets larger than approximately 1.6 Earth-radius (more massive than approximately 6 Earth-masses) contain significant amounts of volatiles or H–He gas (such planets appear to have a diversity of compositions that is not well-explained by a single mass–radius relation as that found in rocky planets).<ref>Benjamin J. Fulton et al. "</ref><ref>Courtney D. Dressing et al. ""</ref><ref>Leslie A. Rogers ""</ref> Similar results are confirmed by other studies.<ref>Lauren M. Weiss, and Geoffrey W. Marcy. ""</ref><ref>Geoffrey W. Marcy, Lauren M. Weiss, Erik A. Petigura, Howard Isaacson, Andrew W. Howard and Lars A. Buchhave. ""</ref><ref>Geoffrey W. Marcy et al. ""</ref> As for mass, the lower limit can vary widely for different planets depending on their compositions; the dividing mass can vary from as low as one to as high as 20 {{Earth mass}}. Theoretical studies of such planets are loosely based on knowledge about Uranus and Neptune. Without a thick atmosphere, it would be classified as an ] instead.<ref>, E.J.W. de Mooij (1), M. Brogi (1), R.J. de Kok (2), J. Koppenhoefer (3,4), S.V. Nefs (1), I.A.G. Snellen (1), J. Greiner (4), J. Hanse (1), R.C. Heinsbroek (1), C.H. Lee (3), P.P. van der Werf (1),</ref> An estimated dividing line between a rocky planet and a gaseous planet is around 1.6-2.0 Earth radii.<ref>, Daniel C. Fabrycky, Jack J. Lissauer, Darin Ragozzine, Jason F. Rowe, Eric Agol, Thomas Barclay, Natalie Batalha, William Borucki, David R. Ciardi, Eric B. Ford, John C. Geary, Matthew J. Holman, Jon M. Jenkins, Jie Li, Robert C. Morehead, Avi Shporer, Jeffrey C. Smith, Jason H. Steffen, Martin Still</ref><ref>, blogs.scientificamerican.com, 20 June 2012</ref> Planets with larger radii and measured masses are mostly low-density and require an extended atmosphere to simultaneously explain their masses and radii, and empirical observations are showing that planets larger than approximately 1.6 Earth-radius (more massive than approximately 6 Earth-masses) contain significant amounts of volatiles or H–He gas (such planets appear to have a diversity of compositions that is not well-explained by a single mass–radius relation as that found in rocky planets).<ref>Benjamin J. Fulton et al. "</ref><ref>Courtney D. Dressing et al. ""</ref><ref>Leslie A. Rogers ""</ref> Similar results are confirmed by other studies.<ref>Lauren M. Weiss, and Geoffrey W. Marcy. ""</ref><ref>Geoffrey W. Marcy, Lauren M. Weiss, Erik A. Petigura, Howard Isaacson, Andrew W. Howard and Lars A. Buchhave. ""</ref><ref>Geoffrey W. Marcy et al. ""</ref> As for mass, the lower limit can vary widely for different planets depending on their compositions; the dividing mass can vary from as low as one to as high as 20 {{Earth mass}}.

Revision as of 01:48, 5 June 2018

A mini-Neptune or sub-Neptune (sometimes known as a gas dwarf or transitional planet) is a planet of up to 10 Earth masses (ME), less massive than Uranus and Neptune, which have about 14.5 ME and 17 ME, respectively. Mini-Neptunes have thick hydrogenhelium atmospheres, probably with deep layers of ice, rock or liquid oceans (made of water, ammonia, a mixture of both, or heavier volatiles).

Theoretical studies of such planets are loosely based on knowledge about Uranus and Neptune. Without a thick atmosphere, it would be classified as an ocean planet instead. An estimated dividing line between a rocky planet and a gaseous planet is around 1.6-2.0 Earth radii. Planets with larger radii and measured masses are mostly low-density and require an extended atmosphere to simultaneously explain their masses and radii, and empirical observations are showing that planets larger than approximately 1.6 Earth-radius (more massive than approximately 6 Earth-masses) contain significant amounts of volatiles or H–He gas (such planets appear to have a diversity of compositions that is not well-explained by a single mass–radius relation as that found in rocky planets). Similar results are confirmed by other studies. As for mass, the lower limit can vary widely for different planets depending on their compositions; the dividing mass can vary from as low as one to as high as 20 ME.

See also

References

  1. D'Angelo, G.; Bodenheimer, P. (2016). "In Situ and Ex Situ Formation Models of Kepler 11 Planets". The Astrophysical Journal. 828 (1): id. 33. arXiv:1606.08088. Bibcode:2016ApJ...828...33D. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/33.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  2. Optical to near-infrared transit observations of super-Earth GJ1214b: water-world or mini-Neptune?, E.J.W. de Mooij (1), M. Brogi (1), R.J. de Kok (2), J. Koppenhoefer (3,4), S.V. Nefs (1), I.A.G. Snellen (1), J. Greiner (4), J. Hanse (1), R.C. Heinsbroek (1), C.H. Lee (3), P.P. van der Werf (1),
  3. Architecture of Kepler's Multi-transiting Systems: II. New investigations with twice as many candidates, Daniel C. Fabrycky, Jack J. Lissauer, Darin Ragozzine, Jason F. Rowe, Eric Agol, Thomas Barclay, Natalie Batalha, William Borucki, David R. Ciardi, Eric B. Ford, John C. Geary, Matthew J. Holman, Jon M. Jenkins, Jie Li, Robert C. Morehead, Avi Shporer, Jeffrey C. Smith, Jason H. Steffen, Martin Still
  4. When Does an Exoplanet’s Surface Become Earth-Like?, blogs.scientificamerican.com, 20 June 2012
  5. Benjamin J. Fulton et al. "The California-Kepler Survey. III. A Gap in the Radius Distribution of Small Planets
  6. Courtney D. Dressing et al. "The Mass of Kepler-93b and The Composition of Terrestrial Planets"
  7. Leslie A. Rogers "Most 1.6 Earth-Radius Planets are not Rocky"
  8. Lauren M. Weiss, and Geoffrey W. Marcy. "The mass-radius relation for 65 exoplanets smaller than 4 Earth radii"
  9. Geoffrey W. Marcy, Lauren M. Weiss, Erik A. Petigura, Howard Isaacson, Andrew W. Howard and Lars A. Buchhave. "Occurrence and core-envelope structure of 1-4x Earth-size planets around Sun-like stars"
  10. Geoffrey W. Marcy et al. "Masses, Radii, and Orbits of Small Kepler Planets: The Transition from Gaseous to Rocky Planets"

External links

Exoplanets
Main topics
Sizes
and
types
Terrestrial
Gaseous
Other types
Formation
and
evolution
Systems
Host stars
Detection
Habitability
Catalogues
Lists
Other
Categories: