Misplaced Pages

Poverty in Pakistan: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:48, 3 May 2018 editMzk224 (talk | contribs)44 edits →Economic and social vulnerability: Added few sentences under "feudalism" section that describes how acquiring and holding land in rural Pakistan is one reason for poverty.Tag: Visual edit← Previous edit Revision as of 07:16, 11 June 2018 edit undo103.89.178.109 (talk) ←Replaced content with ' piti sucks'Tags: Replaced blankingNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Use Pakistani English|date=May 2016}}


piti sucks
'''Poverty in Pakistan''' has fallen dramatically, independent bodies supported estimates of a considerable fall in the statistic by the 2007-08 ], when it was estimated that 17.2% of the total population lived below the poverty line.<ref>{{cite news |title=UNDP Reports Pakistan Poverty Declined to 17%, Under Musharraf |date=7 September 2009 |url=http://www.daily.pk/undp-reports-pakistan-poverty-declined-to-17-under-musharraf-10324/ |publisher=Pakistan Daily |accessdate=2012-03-12 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726234437/http://www.daily.pk/undp-reports-pakistan-poverty-declined-to-17-under-musharraf-10324/ |archivedate=26 July 2011 |df= }}</ref> The declining trend in poverty as seen in the country during the 1970s and 1980s was reversed in the 1990s by poor federal policies and rampant corruption.<ref name="ADB">, ''Asian Development Bank'' (accessed: 2008-05-04)</ref> This phenomenon has been referred to as the "poverty bomb".<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060427002825/http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/1915-cn.htm |date=2006-04-27 }}</ref> In 2001, the government was assisted by the ] (IMF) in preparing the ''Interim Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper'' that suggests guidelines to reduce poverty in the country.<ref name="IPRSP"> (accessed: 2008-05-04)</ref> According to a report sub
mitted by Ministry of Planning and Development in the National Assembly of Pakistan, about 29.5% Pakistani lived below the poverty line which translates into 55 million people.<ref>{{cite web|title=National Assembly Secretariat (34th Session)|url=http://www.na.gov.pk/uploads/documents/questions/1470057800_189.pdf|accessdate=7 December 2016|page=18}}</ref>

As of 2016, Pakistan's ] (HDI) is 0.550, lower than that of nearby Bangladesh's 0.579, which was formerly a part of the country itself. Pakistan's HDI is lowest in South Asia .<ref name="UNDP2016">{{cite web|url=http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_development_report.pdf |title= Human Development Report 2016 – "Human Development for Everyone"|publisher=] ]|accessdate=22 March 2017}}</ref>

] in Pakistan is slightly varied, with the top 10% of the population earning 27.6% and the bottom 10% earning only 4.1% of the income<ref></ref>. Pakistan generally has a low gini co-efficient and therefore a decent distribution of income (relatively lower inequality).<ref name="aiddata.org">{{Cite web|url=http://aiddata.org/blog/poverty-in-pakistan-numerous-efforts-many-numbers-not-enough-results|title=Poverty in Pakistan: Numerous efforts, many numbers, not enough results|last=Patel|first=Dillan|date=|website=AidData (U of William & Mary)|access-date=2018-02-16}}</ref> According to the ] ], Pakistan's ] indicators, especially those for ], fall significantly below those of countries with comparable levels of per-capita income. Pakistan also has a higher ] rate (88 per 1000) than the ]n average (83 per 1000).<ref>, </ref>

As of 2017, the ] reports that there are approximately 210 million people living in Pakistan. In 2011, 12.4% of Pakistanis live below in Pakistan's definition of poverty.<ref>Asian Development Bank. (n.d.). ''Poverty in Pakistan''. Retrieved 21 November 2016 from https://www.adb.org/countries/pakistan/poverty</ref> Statistics vary due to the definition of poverty. According to the ], poverty in Pakistan fell from 64.3% in 2002 to 29.5% in 2014.<ref>https://www.geo.tv/latest/120232-Pakistan-shows-highest-economic-growth-in-eight-years-World-Bank</ref> Pakistan has made substantial progress in reducing poverty giving it the second lowest headcount poverty rate in ].<ref name="auto">{{cite web|url=http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/pakistan/overview|title=Pakistan Overview|work=worldbank.org}}</ref>

AidData cites the World Bank and states that overall "Pakistan has done well in converting economic growth into poverty reduction."<ref name="aiddata.org"/>

==Spatial distribution of poverty==
At the time of the ] of ] in 1947, Pakistan inherited the most backward parts of South Asia with only one university, one Textile Mill and one Jute Factory. The country has made tremendous progress and its per Capita GNP remains the highest in South Asia, after Sri Lanka and India. During the last decade, poverty elimination programs helped many of the poor to participate and rise up. However the Global financial crisis and other factors like the occupation of Afghanistan have impacted Pakistani growth. Poverty in Pakistan has historically been higher in rural areas and lower in the cities. Out of the total 40 million living below the ], 30 million live in rural areas. Poverty rose sharply in the rural areas in the 1990s <ref name=autogenerated4>ADB report pg 11</ref> and the gap in income between urban and rural areas of the country became more significant. This trend has been attributed to a disproportionate impact of economic events in the rural and urban areas. ] also has significant gradients in poverty among the different regions of the province.<ref name=autogenerated4 />

The ] of Pakistan was one of the most backward regions of the South Asia. Despite this, tremendous progress has been made in many areas. The NWFP now boasts several universities including the Ghulam Ishaq Khan University of Science and Technology. Peshawar, a sleep cantonment during British towns, is a modern cosmopolitan city. Much more can be done to invest in the social and economic structures. NWFP remains steeped in tribal culture, though the biggest Pahan city is Soviet invasion of neighboring Afghanistan is intact and according to Western reports supported the ] regime.{{Citation needed|date=January 2010}} These and other activities have led to a breakdown of law and order in many parts of the region.<ref></ref>

==Poverty and gender==

The gender discriminatory practices in Pakistani society also shape the distribution of poverty in the country. Traditional gender roles in Pakistan define the woman's place as in the home and not in the workplace, and define the man as the breadwinner. Consequently, the society invests far less in women than men.<ref>ADB report pg 13</ref> Women in Pakistan suffer from poverty of opportunities throughout their lives. Female literacy in Pakistan is 43.6% compared to Male literacy at 68.2%, as of 2008.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091113144241/http://www.statpak.gov.pk/depts/fbs/publications/lfs2007_08/results.pdf|date=November 13, 2009}}</ref> In legislative bodies, women constituted less than 3% of the legislature elected on general seats before 2002. The 1973 Constitution allowed reserved seats for women in both houses of parliament for a period of 20 years, thus ensuring that women would be represented in parliament regardless of whether or not they are elected on general seats. This provision lapsed in 1993, so parliaments elected subsequently did not
have reserved seats for women. Reserved seats for women have been restored after the election of 2002 .<ref name="Kabeer">
{{cite book
| last = Kabeer
| first = Naila
| authorlink = Naila Kabeer
| title = Reversed Realities
| publisher = Verso, London
| year = 1994
}}
</ref> Female labour rates in Pakistan are exceptionally low.

==Economic and social vulnerability==
] in ], ] with an open ] running along the lane.]]
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; text-align:center; margin:10px; width:300px;"
|+ colspan="5" style="text-align:center;"| Un-Employment Rates
|-
! style="background:#efefef;" rowspan=2 | Administrative Unit
! style="background:#efefef; text-align:center;" colspan="3"|1998 Census
! style="background:#efefef;" rowspan=2 | 1981 Census
|-
! style="background:#efefef;" | Both Sexes
! style="background:#efefef;" | Male
! style="background:#efefef;" | Female
|-
| align=left | ]
| 19.68
| 20.19
| 5.05
| 3.1
|-
| align=right | Rural
| 19.98
| 20.40
| 5.50
| 2.3
|-
| align=right | Urban
| 19.13
| 19.77
| 4.49
| 5.2
|-
| align=left | ]
| 26.83
| 27.51
| 2.58
| 2.2
|-
| align=right | Rural
| 28.16
| 28.64
| 4.00
| 2.0
|-
| align=right | Urban
| 21.00
| 22.34
| 0.74
| 3.7
|-
| align=left | ]
| 19.10
| 19.60
| 5.50
| 3.2
|-
| align=right | Rural
| 18.60
| 19.00
| 6.00
| 2.5
|-
| align=right | Urban
| 20.10
| 20.7
| 4.70
| 5.0
|-
| align=left | ]
| 14.43
| 14.86
| 4.69
| 3.3
|-
| align=right | Rural
| 11.95
| 12.26
| 3.70
| 1.6
|-
| align=right | Urban
| 16.75
| 17.31
| 5.40
| 5.8
|-
| align=left | ]
| 33.48
| 34.14
| 8.67
| 3.1
|-
| align=right | Rural
| 35.26
| 35.92
| 9.81
| 3.0
|-
| align=right | Urban
| 27.67
| 28.33
| 5.35
| 4.0
|-
| align=left | ]
| align=center | 15.70
| align=center | 16.80
| align=center | 1.70
| align=center | 10.7
|-
| align=right | Rural
| align=center | 28.70
| align=center | 29.40
| align=center | 8.20
| align=center | 13.5
|-
| align=right | Urban
| align=center | 10.10
| align=center | 11.00
| align=center | 0.80
| align=center | 9.0
|-
| style="text-align:justify;" colspan="5"| '''Unemployment Rate''': It is the percentage of persons unemployed (those looking for work and temporarily laid off) to the total economically active population (10 years and above). Source:
|}

]

"Vulnerability" in this case stands for the underlying susceptibility of economically deprived people to fall into poverty as a result of exogenous random shocks. Vulnerable households are generally found to have low expenditure levels. Households are considered vulnerable if they do not have the means to smooth out their expenses in response to changes in income. In general, vulnerability is likely to be high in households clustered around the poverty line. Since coping strategies for vulnerable households depend primarily on their sources of income, exogenous shocks can increase reliance on non-agricultural wages. Such diversification has not occurred in many parts of Pakistan, leading to an increased dependence on credit.<ref>ADB report pg 15</ref>

While economic vulnerability is a key factor in the rise of poverty in Pakistan, vulnerability also arises from social powerlessness, political disenfranchisement, and ill-functioning and distortionary institutions, and these also are important causes of the persistence of vulnerability among the poor.<ref name=autogenerated3>ADB report pg 16</ref>

Other causes of vulnerability in Pakistan are the everyday harassment by corrupt government officials, as well as their underperformance, exclusion and denial of basic rights to many in Pakistan. Also, lack of adequate health care by the state lead the poor to seek private sources, which are expensive, but still preferable to the possibility of ] and being given expired medicines in state run medical facilities. Also, the failure by the state to provide adequate law and order in many parts of the country is a factor in the rise of vulnerability of the poor.<ref name=autogenerated3 />

==Environmental issues==
Environmental problems in Pakistan, such as erosion, use of agro-chemicals, deforestation etc. contribute to rising poverty in Pakistan. Increasing pollution contributes to increasing risk of toxicity, and poor industrial standards in the country contribute to rising pollution.<ref>ADB report pg 29</ref><ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070505213852/http://www.iucn.org/places/pakistan/poverty/poverty.htm |date=2007-05-05 }}</ref>

==Lack of adequate governance==

By the end of the 1990s, the manner in which power is exercised in the management of a country's social and economic status resources for development emerged as Pakistan's foremost developmental problem. Corruption and political instabilities such as the insurgency in ] and decade long armed conflict with the Taliban in ] region resulted in reduction of business confidence, deterioration of economic growth, reduced public expenditure, poor delivery of public services, and undermining of the rule of law.<ref>ADB report pg 33</ref> The perceived security threat on the border with India has dominated Pakistan's culture and has led to the domination of military in politics, excessive spending on defense at the expense of social sectors, and the erosion of law and order.{{Citation needed|date=March 2018}}

Pakistan has been run by military dictatorships for large periods of time, alternating with limited democracy.<ref>ADB Report pg 34</ref><ref></ref> These rapid changes in governments led to rapid policy changes and reversals and the reduction of transparency and accountability in government. The onset of military regimes have contributed to non-transparency in resource allocation.Those who do not constitute the political elite are unable to make political leaders and the Government responsive to their needs or accountable to promises. Development priorities are determined not by potential beneficiaries but by the bureaucracy and a political elite which may or may not be in touch with the needs of the citizens. Political instability and macroeconomic imbalances have been reflected in poor creditworthiness ratings, even compared to other countries of similar income levels, with resulting capital flight and lower foreign direct investment inflows. The current government of Pakistan has professed commitments to reforms in this area.<ref>ADB report pg 34</ref>

In addition, Pakistan's major cities and urban centres are home to an estimated 1.2 million street children. This includes beggars and scavengers who are often very young. The law and order problem worsens their condition as boys and girls are fair game to others who would force them into stealing, scavenging and smuggling to survive. A large proportion consumes readily available solvents to starve off hunger, loneliness and fear. Children are vulnerable to contracting STDs such as HIV/AIDS, as well as other diseases.<ref> Pakistan, Poverty Unveiled.World Vision</ref>

==Feudalism==
The main reason for wealth disparity is unequal land distribution. Pakistan is home to a large ] landholding system where landholding families hold thousands of acres and do little work on the ] themselves. Since, feudalism is rampant in such areas, people cannot acquire and hold land, which is one of the main sources of livelihood in rural agricultural areas of Pakistan.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Zaidi|first=Syed Manzar Abbas|date=2010|title=The poverty–radicalisation nexus in Pakistan|url=|journal=Global Crime|volume=11|issue=4|pages=399-420|doi=10.1080/17440572.2010.519521|via=}}</ref> They enlist the services of their ] to perform the labour of the land.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060210001603/http://newsweekly.com.au/articles/2000mar25_pfrcopm.html |date=2006-02-10 }} - News Weekly</ref> 51% of poor tenants owe money to the landlords.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060224153817/http://www.unmc.edu/Community/ruralmeded/underserved/poverty_in_pakistan.htm|date=February 24, 2006}}</ref> The landlords' position of power allows them to exploit the only resource the poor can possibly provide: their own labour.

==Inequality and natural disasters==
{{main article|2010 Pakistan floods}}
# The recent ] have accentuated differences between the wealthy and poor in Pakistan. ], Pakistan's diplomat to the ], has alleged that wealthy ] ]s and ]s in Pakistan have been diverting funds and resources away from the poor and into their own private relief efforts.<ref></ref> Haroon also alluded to was evidence that landowners had allowed embankments to burst, leading to water flowing away from their land.<ref>, ] News</ref> There are also allegations that local authorities colluded with the warlords to divert funds.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120912170952/http://www.zenit.org/rssenglish-30232 |date=2012-09-12 }}</ref> The floods have accentuated the sharp divisions in Pakistan between the wealthy and the poor. The wealthy, with better access to transportation and other facilities, have suffered far less than the poor of Pakistan.<ref>{{cite web|author=Issam Ahmed |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2010/0812/Pakistan-floods-strand-the-poor-while-rich-go-to-higher-ground |title=Pakistan floods strand the poor while rich go to higher ground |publisher=CSMonitor.com |date=2010-08-12 |accessdate=2011-07-26}}</ref>

==See also==
*]
* ]

==References==
{{reflist|colwidth=30em}}

==External links==

{{Economy of Pakistan topics}}
{{Social issues in Pakistan}}
{{Pakistan topics}}
{{Asia topic|Poverty in}}

]

Revision as of 07:16, 11 June 2018

piti sucks