| Revision as of 19:25, 29 October 2006 editShoester (talk | contribs)844 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:42, 30 October 2006 edit undo64.149.18.201 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| Asgardian look at this | Asgardian look at this | ||
| Hello | Hello | ||
| Can you please keep an eye on the edits of Asgardian? He is making POV editor and disregarding formatting standards on The Gladiator and Abomination pages. Thank you. T-1000 18:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC) | Can you please keep an eye on the edits of Asgardian? He is making POV editor and disregarding formatting standards on The Gladiator and Abomination pages. Thank you. T-1000 18:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC){{unsigned|Brian Boru is awesome}} | ||
| Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:CovenantD" | Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:CovenantD" | ||
Revision as of 05:42, 30 October 2006
User notice: temporary 3RR block
Regarding reversions made on October 26 2006 to Man Beast
WR Justin Eiler 00:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Please consider
Asgardian look at this Hello Can you please keep an eye on the edits of Asgardian? He is making POV editor and disregarding formatting standards on The Gladiator and Abomination pages. Thank you. T-1000 18:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian Boru is awesome (talk • contribs)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:CovenantD"
- After your edit note "At least two posters put a lot of work into getting the article to the level it is" I went back and looked through the Hercules Marvel edit history to see if I'd supported the wrong version. After looking through your history of warring with everybody and blowing off good advice, all I can say about "At least two posters put a lot of work into getting the article to the level it is" is wow that's ironic! You remind me of my brother-in-law who expects patience and consideration from others but won't give same. You been at this two months and have exactly zero allies against lots of counter-editors. When people try to work with you, you turn right around and do the same thing you been doing or just insult them for not teaching you nicely enough. This looks like you're just stubbornly trying to win instead of methodically improving articles. (And now comes the snippy or faux reasonable reply where you try to show how you're better than me while indicating I'm obviously some inconsiderate dummy based on blah-blah-blah that I said. Get a clue! Notice how many people disagree with you.) Shoester 19:25, 29 October 2006 (UTC)