Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:26, 30 October 2006

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Shortcuts WP:RFPP WP:RFP WP:RPP Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Skip to table of contents requests to raise protection lower protection requested edits (purge) Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit

Archives

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Current requests for protection

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Charles Darwin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I believe 'semiprotect' is justified. The rate of vandalism, and reversion is very heavy and time consuming. CMacMillan 19:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 19:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Mallcore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Many IP members are erasing important parts of the article (pictures, trivia, etc...). Semi-protection is needed. Zouavman Le Zouave 18:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 19:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Italy national football team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Edit War is happening. Full protection is needed. Kingjeff 18:19, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Appears to be an issue with a single user. Try Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR if problem persists. --Allen3  18:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Australia national football (soccer) team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Edit was is happening. Full protection is needed. Kingjeff 17:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Appears to be an issue with a single user. Try Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR if problem persists. --Allen3  18:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

England national football team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Edit war is happening. Full protection is needed. Kingjeff 17:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment this is not an edit war; this is one user breaking making one change up to the 3RR rule (but not breaking it) and then calling for protection. The first edit was earlier this evening - there has not been time for discussion on talk yet. Talk has now begun and a consensus should come out. Protection would be uncessairily disruptive at such an early stage in a content dispute. --Robdurbar 18:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Appears to be an issue with a single user. Try Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR if problem persists. --Allen3  18:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Kingjeff has declared an edit war, has broken the 3RR, inserts statements he does not want to discuss, and now asks for protection.--Panarjedde 18:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I never declared any edit war. I realize your edit war. Kingjeff 18:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Parma, Ohio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Request protection. Various anonymous users and one-time users have been resisted all attempts to remove POV spam.--Mycroft.Holmes 17:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 16:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Protection may be necessary as Mycroft.Holmes continues to vandalize the page by mass deleting legitimate contributions by everyone but him/her. He/she is bent on suppressing contributions to the article and does not provide rational justifications for these mass vandalistic attempts that repeatedly take place. I am willing to cede the economic section, but this history section covers THE most significant news related to the city that spanned several years. There is no non-whacky reason to delete this material, especially when just about everyone other than the other Mycroft wants it to stay. Happy Halloween Eve! --Mycroft.Holmz 17:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Full protection is requested for this page. The deleted material is either blatantly POV or has been rejected by common agreement (see "invisible" HTML comments). In addition, various edits have been made with socks mimicking legitimate user names. I would request that those users (specifically "Mycroft Holmz" and "Hemto") be permanently blocked.--Mycroft.Holmes 19:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

If anything, YOU should be permanently blocked! You are unwilling to compromise, arrogant, and ridiculous. The rest of us, however, are willing to concede to pet store section of the economy, but the alleged POV stuff can be found on various TV and newspaper sights and is therefore documentable FACTS that were/are significant to Parma. You might not be familiar with recent Parma news events, but those of us who are know that everything under the history section is about as accurate as they get and so for you to just keep knocking away at others' legitimate efforts to contribute to Misplaced Pages is beyond lame. Cheers, --Hemto 19:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

User:Slgrandson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protect, since a vandal by the name of Brainyshane640 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) left unkind comments at my page some hours ago. Metropolitan90 has warned him; I would like you to block him ASAP. (My user page got semi-protected at SIMPLE for that same reason.) --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 17:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined WP:AIV is the place to report that, but if it continues report back here. --Alex (Talk) 17:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

David Fromkin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Request semi-protection. Anonymous users continue to defy consensus and revert article to include trivia about a dog, refusing to engage in discussion. Theleek 16:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 16:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

SDragonRocker5 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection Attack page that keeps getting redirected (first it really needs to be speedied) by user with dynamic ip.--Joe Jklin (T C) 02:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

The Awareness Center, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection. Two editors alternate between an attack page and a sympathetic article. The talk page is empty. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 23:25, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined – There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. --Alex (Talk) 23:36, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Natalie Merchant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection, the article has already been protected once some months ago. Anonymous keep removing the information about her husband and child, requesting to keep her privacy, however that information is published in reliable sources. Been this way for some time already. It is not a full edit war, but it carries on for weeks. -- ReyBrujo 23:13, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined – There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. --Alex (Talk) 23:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Holly Marie Combs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection, extremely silly matter, people can't agree whether her son was born or not. Anonymous keep adding the information without sources, registered users remove it. -- ReyBrujo 23:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 23:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Al Aqsa Mosque (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Requesting Full Protection per the reason that protected Dome of the Rock for a dispute without progress in talk - infinite edit war. Amoruso 21:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Lion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This page has been repeatedly vandalized several times in the past few weeks, and almost a dozen times in the past week alone, generally from anonymous/IP users. Badbilltucker 18:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined It's been alright for today, no need for protection at the moment. --Alex (Talk) 18:23, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Neopets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection, HUGE amounts of vandalism from IP/new users. -Amarkov 15:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 16:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Preity Zinta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Request semi-protection because of removal of facts and references by anon/new user despite warning:

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 14:21, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Japan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Declined – There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. --Alex (Talk) 12:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

The article has been vandalised 6 times already today. Is this not enough activity?? Bobo12345 05:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

History of Japan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Request semi-protection. Both of these pages are subject to vandalism from anonymous IPs on a daily basis. This is very disruptive to constructive editing of the articles. Bobo12345 12:12, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined – There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. --Alex (Talk) 12:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Paris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection for the huge amounts of vandalism that have been taking place this morning. Someone is bored, and it's a waste of time. --Shanesan 09:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC) Declined It appears to have calmed down now. --Alex (Talk) 11:34, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Ashley Tisdale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection, vandalised at least 2-3times every day. Has been happening for a while. Malevious 00:00, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected —Centrx→talk • 00:03, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Lil Wayne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Extreme amount of vandalism, up to 10-15 times per day, all saying Lil Wayne is a homosexual with his mentor/record label owner and small edits to his Billboard Chart history, inflating numbers because they disagree/just can't believe ever single he's released wasn't #1 and that every album wasn't platinum. Thanks in advance. Cnota 17:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 17:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I appreciate it Alex!Cnota 19:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

• WP:RFUP
• WP:RFPU

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Marvel: Ultimate Alliance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

THe game has been released for most consoles, so it would make sense to unprotect this page.Cnriaczoy42 13:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment The page was protected due to an edit war, which has been resolved. Also, this is the second time unprotection has been asked for, but the first was ignored and unresolved. JQF 15:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Unprotected appears to have been resolved. --Alex (Talk) 15:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Egypt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The article has been semi-protected for three weeks. Please unprotect. — · ☥ 02:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC) Unprotected --Alex (Talk) 11:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Current requests for significant edits to a protected page

• WP:RFED

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Template:Anon vandal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In the source, right after "blocked from editing.", there is another {{{1|}}}. So, say if somebody puts {{subst:anon vandal-n|Greek}} on a user's talk page, the word greek would just randomly show up in the middle of the template. This needs to be removed. Try it on your own user talk page for proof. Thankyou. --Iced Kola 22:11, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, I tried it and I didn't find anything wrong with the template. // Sasuke-kun27 22:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

I found the page name added into the middle, I've removed it. --Alex (Talk) 22:25, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Pacific Western University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

After many edit wars (and perhaps a complaint to the Foundation??), BradPatrick cut the article back to a stub with the comment, "Protected Pacific Western University: POV; sources; restart article; see talk page ". I researched the subject, made comments on the talk page, and wrote up a new, draft NPOV article on a user subpage at User:A. B./Draft Articles. I also left a note on Brad Patrick's talk page and received back a rather noncommittal answer. I'm asking that the new draft article replace what's there or else someone explain what I should do next. Note that I had nothing to do with the orginal article and have no stake, pro or con, in PWU. It's time to move forward with something more than a stub. --A. B. 22:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Wait until you get a decent enough consensus on the talk page, then I'll add them with attribution (or just unprotect to let them be added and then re-protect).Voice-of-All 05:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Already unprotected. —Centrx→talk • 18:44, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Fulfilled/denied requests

Paramount Pictures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Page has been frequently vandalised by several IP addresses recently, despite warnings. Green451 15:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 15:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Brand New (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection request. Recent organised vandalism and spamming from Brand New's forum causing a stupid amount of reverts over the last few days. Semi-protection should at least calm things down for a while. -Halo 15:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 15:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Defense of Sihang Warehouse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection request, many recent unregistered IP edits because this page is being linked to from the main page. Ddcc 14:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined Today's featured article cannot be protected, as it defeats the idea of anyone being able to edit. --Alex (Talk) 15:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Failure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection, gets vandalized 3-4 times a day for some times, from various IP addresses but always about the same subject. Luccas 06:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 15:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

CarMax (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection request, recent vandalism by various unregistered IP addresses (always the same content) which is continuing despite a conversation topic on the discussion page for the article. --Staus 12:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Alex (Talk) 15:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

United States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Was protected a while ago, and there seems to have been no vandalism in a while when viewing the page history. Lets try out taking off semi-protection on editing. Iced Kola 02:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Unprotected --Alex (Talk) 11:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Christopher Martin-Jenkins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection requested, if an admin thinks it's appropriate in this case. The vandalism appears to be from only one user, and is only about once a day, but comes from a variety of different dynamic IPs so is hard to block any other way. The content is possibly libellous and certainly against WP:LIVING. Stephen Turner (Talk) 10:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 11:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Heather Wilson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full or semi-protection, Seems to be hit by sockpuppets and anon IPs, spate of vandals. SunStar Net 08:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Alex (Talk) 11:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Failure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection, gets vandalized 3-4 times a day for some times, from various IP addresses but always about the same subject. Luccas 06:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 11:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Diego Sánchez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Requesting Semi-protection. Tons of recent vandalism by several different IP's and user accounts. Semi will probably do for now though depending on how many more accounts the vandal(s) have made specifically to vandalize this article. VegaDark 05:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined The vandalism seems to have stopped for now. --Alex (Talk) 10:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

User:Psychonaut (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Requesting change in status from full protection to semi-protection. An admin had protected my user page due to vandalism by throwaway accounts, but that means I can no longer edit it. The vandalism would probably continue if the page were completely unprotected, but not with semi-protection. —Psychonaut 04:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 10:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Template:Horror Icons (edit | ] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Requesting full protection on the grounds that there is a heated debate about the criteria for this page, and edit wars have been raging because of it. I request that the page be protected as it appears during this current time (which would make it its original design) until this can all be settled. Thank you. Bignole 03:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Fully protected --Alex (Talk) 10:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

User talk:203.101.61.10 (edit | ] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

User talk page is protected, user is engaged in mass-vandalism (+is a suspected sockpuppet) and users are unable to warn appropriately. No reason for protecting the page was given. Sfacets 07:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Unprotected --Alex (Talk) 11:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Singapore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I am filing this semi-protection request on behalf of 121.6.179.213 who added a sprotect tag to the article, presumably thinking that doing so would semi-protect the article. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 07:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: I don't see much vandalism in the history... Shanesan 07:44, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined If it is just one vandal, then warn and revert vandalism, and report to AIV for vandalism after a t4. Nishkid64 18:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Counter-Vandalism Unit (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Requesting full move protection due to recent pagemove vandalism. John254 01:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined both appear to have been dealt with OK. --Alex (Talk) 01:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Marvel:_Ultimate_Alliance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Game is already released. So it needs great clean-up and edits. KvaZaR 15:47, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment: it was put to full protection due to an edit war, which has now been resolved. It was at Semi-protection at the time, so maybe put it back to Semi-Protected? JQF 18:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

(Lelv) I also think it should be "Semi-Protected". For example, Nick Fury was set as a Playable Character, but no one wrote that because it's protected!

Misplaced Pages talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit (edit | project page | history | links | watch | logs)

Requesting full move protection due to recent pagemove vandalism. John254 01:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined both appear to have been dealt with OK. --Alex (Talk) 01:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Battleground:_Fact_and_Fantasy_in_Palestine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Please protect this page from editing. There is one user, Amoruso, who constantly reverts any edits not made by him, or those by users trying to remove the biased text promoting this book. He will not calm down, not talk or explain his actions, and has started a revert war. We need to control this and stop individual users from stopping work on fixing pages which might be controversial. ~~ sign (I think that is the right code to sign)

Fully protected --Alex (Talk) 01:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Rush Limbaugh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection - Current event, plus highly popular vandalism target. Repeated name calling and addition of POV terms and this sample since 22:48, October 27, 2006 (UTC): --Dual Freq 00:30, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 00:33, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Bill Gates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This has been semi-protected for about three weeks. Let's unprotect and see how it goes. -/- Warren 01:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Unprotected —this is messedrocker (talk) 12:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment, this page has been recieving a good deal of petty vandalism since it's unprotection. Re-requesting semi-protection. Shanesan 07:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Daylight saving time (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection, has been recieving vandalism from various IP addresses for much of the day. - Jasonb 08:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment, it has been vandalized a good deal today, though that should stop on Monday. Perhaps a temporary protection. --Shanesan 08:18, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Reply, I was under the impression that semi-protects were temporary. I'd be happy with that. - Jasonb 08:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Semi-protected Coredesat 08:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Justin Timberlake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi Protect Still getting lots of IP vandalism; so much that real editors are having trouble sorting it out. -05:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Semi-protected —Centrx→talk • 05:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

RuneScape (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

MessedRocker must have been out of his mind when he lifted semi-protection. This is the 7th most vandalized article in the English Misplaced Pages. Since semi-protection was lifted, there have been 21 vandal edits in the past 12 hours, which works out to about 42 vandal edits in 24 hours. We were so close to a GA nomination - all we had to do was write a short section on Membership and a paragraph on press reviews. Now we have to start all over again. Please semi-protect so we can work in peace without letting the anonymous vandals destroy the article. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 02:21, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Semi-protected —Centrx→talk • 02:25, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Allegations of Israeli Apartheid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I believe everyone has cooled off as much as possible on this topic and various failures as to WP:AGF have been worked out. -- Kendrick7 20:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

I think there are still heated emotions and accusations flying on the talk page. It may be better to try a sandbox first. --Deodar 20:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Deodar is correct, things haven't been sorted out yet. Jayjg 03:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Declined Issues not resolved. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 04:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

King's College School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Considering the fact that there has been no vandalism since the restoration of the article (and it was deleted around a month ago now I believe) and that most vandalism before came from the school computers - on which the whole of Misplaced Pages is now blocked - I believe this does not require protection. Xeixz 12:44, 26 October 2006 (UTC) Unprotected Betacommand 13:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Edward Gibbon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This page has been protected for about 2 weeks now. It had been disputed and was being supervised (may still be?) by Robindch. I would like to clean up the 'Further Reading' section using 3 bibliographies, and add material related to Gibbon's illness and his trips to the Continent. Thanks. Stevewk 16:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

UnprotectedBetacommand 03:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm hoping to be unprotected from the Kosovo page, which is presently protected against edits by unregistered or recently registered users. I have only recently registered but have long contributed to the Kosovo page and Talk pages as '(JD)'. Many thanks. JamesAVD 13:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Michael E. Davis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Clearly a notable person per WP:BIO, and linked from the wikimedia board of directors list, this page should have an article (and not a redirect). Sdr (talk · contribs) has volunteered to write the article, and I agree. Vectro 05:55, 26 October 2006 (UTC) Unprotected Betacommand 13:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

LOL (Internet slang) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection, Heavy IP vandalism, including an exorbitant amount of vandalism from 6:21 to 6:47 UTC. bibliomaniac15

• Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 23:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Douche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Protection - Heavy IP vandalism; not much being contributed from IPs. -Patstuart 22:39, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

• Semi-protected --Alex (Talk) 22:46, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I wanted to ask for temporary (full) protection of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam page, in order to prevent a revert war and complicate the mediation effort that started a week or so ago. This would encourage all sides to sit and talk rather that unilaterally impose changes on the page and expect a cycle of reverts. Elalan 16:30, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

• Semi-protected Ardo 22:55, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Sukkot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Over the past couple of days there have been many vandal attacks (some of which has been blatant anti-Semitism) mostly by IP addresses and needs for many reversions and so I ask for temporary semi-protection. Valley2city 17:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)