Revision as of 17:22, 31 October 2006 editCraig Thomasian (talk | contribs)59 edits →Armenian DNA← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:31, 31 October 2006 edit undoEupator (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers9,166 edits →Armenian DNANext edit → | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
look in the findings section, please read carefully--] 17:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | look in the findings section, please read carefully--] 17:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
:I can't find any mention of Armenians in the NG link. I found something about that cave and that was it. If you don't provide a verifibale source i'm going to assume you're making this up.--] 17:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:31, 31 October 2006
Armenia Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Armenian DNA
Here is an older study that has similar results http://www.ucl.ac.uk/tcga/tcgapdf/Weale-HG-01-Armenia.pdf
you dont need an account to view it. the National Geographic Project is the most recent and respected that;s why I did not mention the older UK study.--Craig Thomasian 17:12, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes but I don't see anyhting like what you're claiming in either study.--Eupator 17:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
look in the findings section, please read carefully--Craig Thomasian 17:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- I can't find any mention of Armenians in the NG link. I found something about that cave and that was it. If you don't provide a verifibale source i'm going to assume you're making this up.--Eupator 17:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)