Misplaced Pages

talk:Advocacy ducks: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:12, 16 July 2018 editCa2james (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,294 edits →Banner shell: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 18:25, 16 July 2018 edit undoCa2james (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,294 editsm →Banner shell: typo and remove extraneous itNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:
== Banner shell == == Banner shell ==


I'd the banner shell because it at thst time it was wrapped around a single wikiproject and the article history milestones. Obviously article history milestones are not a wikiproject and so don't belong in the banner shell. That left a single wikiproject included in the banner shell, which made the banner shell (which refers to *multiple* wikiprojects) incorrect. Obviously now that a second wikiproject apparently associated with this essay has been added, the use of the banner shell is no longer incorrect (weird, maybe, with only two wikiprojects listed, but not incorrect). I'd the banner shell because at that time it was wrapped around a single wikiproject and the article history milestones. Obviously article history milestones are not a wikiproject and so don't belong in the banner shell. That left a single wikiproject included in the banner shell, which made the banner shell (which refers to *multiple* wikiprojects) incorrect. Obviously now that a second wikiproject apparently associated with this essay has been added, the use of the banner shell is no longer incorrect (weird, maybe, with only two wikiprojects listed, but not incorrect).


{{u|Atsme}}, I don't know why you me to discuss this on the talk page since I thought my edit summary was quite clear and I hadn't objected to the reintroduction of the banner shell. Next time, please do ask if you have questions. ] (]) 18:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC) {{u|Atsme}}, I don't know why you me to discuss this on the talk page since I thought my edit summary was quite clear and I hadn't objected to the reintroduction of the banner shell. Next time, please do ask if you have questions. ] (]) 18:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:25, 16 July 2018

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Advocacy ducks page.
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconMisplaced Pages essays Low‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Misplaced Pages essays, a collaborative effort to organize and monitor the impact of Misplaced Pages essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.Misplaced Pages essaysWikipedia:WikiProject Misplaced Pages essaysTemplate:WikiProject Misplaced Pages essaysWikiProject Misplaced Pages essays
LowThis page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.
WikiProject iconIntegrity
WikiProject iconThis page is part of Wikiproject Integrity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on Misplaced Pages having edits by contributors with a monetary obligation to edit the article topic. To participate, you can edit the attached page or contribute further at WikiProject Integrity.IntegrityWikipedia:WikiProject IntegrityTemplate:WikiProject IntegrityIntegrity
Misplaced Pages milestones
DateProcessResult
May 23, 2015Miscellany for deletionKept

Banner shell

I'd removed the banner shell because at that time it was wrapped around a single wikiproject and the article history milestones. Obviously article history milestones are not a wikiproject and so don't belong in the banner shell. That left a single wikiproject included in the banner shell, which made the banner shell (which refers to *multiple* wikiprojects) incorrect. Obviously now that a second wikiproject apparently associated with this essay has been added, the use of the banner shell is no longer incorrect (weird, maybe, with only two wikiprojects listed, but not incorrect).

Atsme, I don't know why you told me to discuss this on the talk page since I thought my edit summary was quite clear and I hadn't objected to the reintroduction of the banner shell. Next time, please do ask if you have questions. Ca2james (talk) 18:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Categories: