| Revision as of 23:13, 1 November 2006 editEVula (talk | contribs)39,066 editsm adding note about previous vote← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:38, 1 November 2006 edit undoSFGiants (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,309 edits →[]: DeleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per above. ] 21:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per above. ] 21:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Confused!'''!!! SomewhatDamaged.net is not my website, it is my brother's (hence the difference in the username) and I wrote this article as a birthday present for him. As for the accusations of "advertising", I would have to say false, especially concidering the website is not even currently up and may not be for some time. ] 17:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC) <small>(note: this was actually posted by {{user|24.51.173.178}})</small> | *'''Confused!'''!!! SomewhatDamaged.net is not my website, it is my brother's (hence the difference in the username) and I wrote this article as a birthday present for him. As for the accusations of "advertising", I would have to say false, especially concidering the website is not even currently up and may not be for some time. ] 17:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC) <small>(note: this was actually posted by {{user|24.51.173.178}})</small> | ||
| * '''Delete''' per above. ]]] ] ] 23:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:38, 1 November 2006
Somewhatdamaged
A website that doesn't appear to be notable. It doesn't really fit any CSD criteria and a prod would surely be removed, so I'm taking it here. My vote is Delete'. Danny Lilithborne 05:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Response It should be noted that the article specifies "Before the server crash in March of 2006, which rendered SomewhatDamaged.net inaccessible to all of North America and many other parts of the world even to this date". For further validation as to the existance of SomewhatDamaged.net, please contact the administrator of Clandemonium.net at the following email address: admin@cdmhosting.ca. They should then be able to provide you with any and all information neccassary to "notarize" the website. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renholder5x (talk • contribs)
- Comment Whether it exists or not is not the issue here, but whether it's notable. Danny Lilithborne 05:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- You make a valid point, but to which I would ask you to "hold the phone" on the reccomendation that it be deleted. This is because the website should be back up sometime fairly soon, as should the premiering of the accompanying website, NepaDollz.com. This article is not inflicting any sort of damage on anyone, nor is it violating any reasonable terms of violation set forth by Misplaced Pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renholder5x (talk • contribs)
- Comment Whether it exists or not is not the issue here, but whether it's notable. Danny Lilithborne 05:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete An Alexa ranking below 1,800,000 hardly indicates the "massive traffic" stated in the article. And if you have to email a webhost administrator, then the article is not verifiable by reliable secondary sources. NawlinWiki 05:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Non-notable website. Contacting a third party to verify information would count as original research, no? Evidence of notability needs to be presented in reliable (and verifiable) sources. EVula 05:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Speedy Delete G11 Blatant advertising. I'm changing my vote after seeing Robertbcole's response and Renholder5x's blanking of this AfD seems to suggest an attitude about Misplaced Pages's purpose that isn't quite in line with a NPOV encyclopedia (that and the extreme POV in the article). EVula 16:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)- Delete per WP:WEB --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 13:49, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per the reasons stated. Also, in response to RenHolder5x's comments about the former prestige of this website, I would point editors here. The Alexa traffic details for this site show that is has never entered the top 100,000 and page views are certainly nothing to gawk at. -bobby 15:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. - Ektar 17:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Kf4bdy 17:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete!!! per above Ozzykhan 17:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Cbrown1023 21:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Confused!!!! SomewhatDamaged.net is not my website, it is my brother's (hence the difference in the username) and I wrote this article as a birthday present for him. As for the accusations of "advertising", I would have to say false, especially concidering the website is not even currently up and may not be for some time. Renholder5x 17:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC) (note: this was actually posted by 24.51.173.178 (talk · contribs))
- Delete per above. ¿ςפקιДИτς! ☺ ☻ 23:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)