| Revision as of 00:04, 31 July 2018 editBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,116 edits →Corbyn: rp← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:00, 1 August 2018 edit undoTanbircdq (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,440 edits CommentNext edit → | ||
| Line 138: | Line 138: | ||
| == Corbyn == | == Corbyn == | ||
| Don't put this section back again with those "sources". You'll be blocked for edit-warring to violate BLP if you do. ] 23:19, 30 July 2018 (UTC) | Don't put this section back again with those "sources". You'll be blocked for edit-warring to violate BLP if you do. ] 23:19, 30 July 2018 (UTC) | ||
| : the blog is a blog of the cst not a random unsourced blog, and why would the jc not be a valid source? ] <sup>]</sup> 23:51, 30 July 2018 (UTC) | : the blog is a blog of the cst not a random unsourced blog, and why would the jc not be a valid source? ] <sup>]</sup> 23:51, 30 July 2018 (UTC) | ||
| Line 144: | Line 143: | ||
| ::: I'm asking about your edit summary where I read it as thejc not being a RS, regardless of what they post, not about this specific edit. ] <sup>]</sup> 00:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC) | ::: I'm asking about your edit summary where I read it as thejc not being a RS, regardless of what they post, not about this specific edit. ] <sup>]</sup> 00:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :::: I'm not saying thejc isn't a reliable source ''in general'', I'm saying that particular link didn't source the attack on Corbyn - which it didn't. If I was unclear, I apologise. But you're an experienced enough editor that I think you understood what I meant. ] 00:04, 31 July 2018 (UTC) | :::: I'm not saying thejc isn't a reliable source ''in general'', I'm saying that particular link didn't source the attack on Corbyn - which it didn't. If I was unclear, I apologise. But you're an experienced enough editor that I think you understood what I meant. ] 00:04, 31 July 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :::::Also, I've changed on ]. The word "leading" even if sourced is still clearly POV, "most prominent" is WEASEL adds nothing as all three newspapers are mentioned. 00:00, 1 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:00, 1 August 2018
| This is Sir Joseph's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
|
Template:Archive box collapsible
Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Biography
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Biography. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Francisco Reynés
Hi Sir Joseph! Some days ago, you declined this draft. I've been working on it... Could you review it? This businessman is important because he is Chairman and CEO of one of the top 2,000 public companies in the world by Forbes (#287), and the references show the subject's notability. Thank you!--ImTheSpaceman (talk) 18:24, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Notice
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:16, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Notice
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:17, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Richard B. Spencer
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Richard B. Spencer. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Adolf Hitler
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Adolf Hitler. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Marketing of electronic cigarettes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Marketing of electronic cigarettes. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Cranial electrotherapy stimulation
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cranial electrotherapy stimulation. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Jewish religious terrorism
Hi. I think this could be relevant to you.--יניב הורון (Yaniv) (talk) 14:07, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day
|
Hey, Sir Joseph. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee! Have a great day! TheDoctorWho (talk) 01:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC) |
|
Please comment on Talk:Steve Down
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Steve Down. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Bot request
I tried to fix a header in your recent bot request, but was reverted. I don't do thinkgs twice, - can you fix it, also in the table? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- I fixed the spelling error but I think the table is generated automatically. Sir Joseph 20:27, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Misplaced Pages:Village pump (policy)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Misplaced Pages:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
|
Hello Sir Joseph, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- June backlog drive
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
- New technology, new rules
- New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
- Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
- Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
- Editathons
- Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
- The Signpost
- The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Corbyn
Don't put this section back again with those "sources". You'll be blocked for edit-warring to violate BLP if you do. Black Kite (talk) 23:19, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- the blog is a blog of the cst not a random unsourced blog, and why would the jc not be a valid source? Sir Joseph 23:51, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Erm, because they're sourcing "In 2010 Jeremy Corbyn was directly accused of enabling antisemitism." Where is that mentioned in any of those sources? Straightforward BLP violation. And if you try to twist those sources to mention that Corbyn was present at certain events where other people said certain things, you're going to get the same response. Simply, don't do it. Black Kite (talk) 23:58, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- I'm asking about your edit summary where I read it as thejc not being a RS, regardless of what they post, not about this specific edit. Sir Joseph 00:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not saying thejc isn't a reliable source in general, I'm saying that particular link didn't source the attack on Corbyn - which it didn't. If I was unclear, I apologise. But you're an experienced enough editor that I think you understood what I meant. Black Kite (talk) 00:04, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Also, I've changed your edit on Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party. The word "leading" even if sourced is still clearly POV, "most prominent" is WEASEL adds nothing as all three newspapers are mentioned. 00:00, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not saying thejc isn't a reliable source in general, I'm saying that particular link didn't source the attack on Corbyn - which it didn't. If I was unclear, I apologise. But you're an experienced enough editor that I think you understood what I meant. Black Kite (talk) 00:04, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- I'm asking about your edit summary where I read it as thejc not being a RS, regardless of what they post, not about this specific edit. Sir Joseph 00:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Erm, because they're sourcing "In 2010 Jeremy Corbyn was directly accused of enabling antisemitism." Where is that mentioned in any of those sources? Straightforward BLP violation. And if you try to twist those sources to mention that Corbyn was present at certain events where other people said certain things, you're going to get the same response. Simply, don't do it. Black Kite (talk) 23:58, 30 July 2018 (UTC)