| Revision as of 18:18, 2 November 2006 editPostdlf (talk | contribs)Administrators91,177 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:28, 2 November 2006 edit undoElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,958 edits ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| I am not convinced that the term ] is independently notable, and I recommend that its information be merged into this article. I would also like to see additional references for "FatWallet", to verify notability, as right now this article smells a lot like self-promotion. --] 18:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | I am not convinced that the term ] is independently notable, and I recommend that its information be merged into this article. I would also like to see additional references for "FatWallet", to verify notability, as right now this article smells a lot like self-promotion. --] 18:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Could you please use <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> for specific statements in the article? The last two paragraphs about the lawsuit are in fact referenced. ] 18:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | :Could you please use <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> for specific statements in the article? The last two paragraphs about the lawsuit are in fact referenced. ] 18:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :: Right now there are no references on the page, aside from the organization's own website. There need to be further references which prove notability, such as newspaper or magazine articles. A link to a legal document is what's called a "primary" source. We need secondary sources. See ] and ]. --] 18:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:28, 2 November 2006
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the FatWallet article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Merge
I am not convinced that the term App-O-Rama is independently notable, and I recommend that its information be merged into this article. I would also like to see additional references for "FatWallet", to verify notability, as right now this article smells a lot like self-promotion. --Elonka 18:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- Could you please use {{fact}} for specific statements in the article? The last two paragraphs about the lawsuit are in fact referenced. Postdlf 18:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- Right now there are no references on the page, aside from the organization's own website. There need to be further references which prove notability, such as newspaper or magazine articles. A link to a legal document is what's called a "primary" source. We need secondary sources. See Misplaced Pages:Verifiability and WP:RS. --Elonka 18:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)