| Revision as of 05:23, 9 August 2018 editNinjaRobotPirate (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators147,693 edits →August 2018: decline← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:10, 12 August 2018 edit undoTanbircdq (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,440 edits Unblock replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 508: | Line 508: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|reason=I acknowledge that I've been blocked for copyright violations. I realise that I've been careless and/or complacent which had led to my editing falling short at times. I've tried to ensure that my general contributions are in good faith and it was not my intention to make these violations. However, I've read through ] and ] in detail and made myself familiar with the rules and guidelines. I make a resolution to be more careful in future and I would like to request to be unblocked.|decline=Besides the copyright violations, you seem to have a history of sock puppetry. You were given a last chance unblock in 2017 under the condition that you cease all use of alternate accounts, even legitimate ones. As far as I can tell, you've kept to that, but you've been editing while logged out, presumably to ]. This should be addressed in any future unblock requests. ] (]) 05:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed|reason=I acknowledge that I've been blocked for copyright violations. I realise that I've been careless and/or complacent which had led to my editing falling short at times. I've tried to ensure that my general contributions are in good faith and it was not my intention to make these violations. However, I've read through ] and ] in detail and made myself familiar with the rules and guidelines. I make a resolution to be more careful in future and I would like to request to be unblocked.|decline=Besides the copyright violations, you seem to have a history of sock puppetry. You were given a last chance unblock in 2017 under the condition that you cease all use of alternate accounts, even legitimate ones. As far as I can tell, you've kept to that, but you've been editing while logged out, presumably to ]. This should be addressed in any future unblock requests. ] (]) 05:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)}} | ||
| {{unblock|reason=I've not operated any other accounts during my previous block or since and as far as I'm aware I've not been editing while logged out either. ] (]) 13:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)}} | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | ==] nomination of ]== | ||
Revision as of 13:10, 12 August 2018
| This is Tanbircdq's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 |
 Archives |
| • 2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 |
|
Welcome
|
Nomination of Mahmud al-Rashid for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahmud al-Rashid is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mahmud al-Rashid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmiri 18:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Tanbircdq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #17440 was submitted on Feb 01, 2017 22:13:03. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 22:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Tanbircdq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #17748 was submitted on Mar 12, 2017 19:25:16. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 19:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Unblock request
Tanbircdq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
For the five years I was editing the encyclopedia, and I have made large contributions in creating and improving many articles from a wide variety of subjects. I intend to generally make gnome edits to any article I come across for maintenance but have a particular interest in those of involving British Bangladeshis and Muslims. I've been blocked due to the result of SPI and AE against me. I acknowledge that the poor conduct leading up to my ban was unacceptable and I do not dispute to receiving the ban. Before this I had a good record of engaging and collaborating with other editors in good-fath. I understand that there are ways of resolving conflict resolution without resorting to behaviour which contravenes policy guidelines. During my block, I have made contributions on the Commons page. I feel I can make further constructive and productive contributions, therefore, should be give the opportunity to be allowed to return to the website.
Accept reason:
Accepted with unblock conditions, as described below. ~ Rob13 18:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please provide a full history of your socking, including whether it continued after your block, and a deeper explanation of what led you to sockpuppetry/why I should believe you will not do it again. You were caught socking twice (one in 2014, a second time leading to your indefinite block), so I will need a thorough and candid explanation to have any chance of convincing me a continued block is not preventative. ~ Rob13 22:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- A full history is available on the SPIs here and it did not continue after by block as I haven't edited Misplaced Pages since other than the contributions on the Commons page. The first instance was just stupidity. The second instance was due the frustration and injustice I felt after an editor accused me of having an agenda and I retaliated.
- I've gone over nine months without editing, I'm not sure if I would now have time to be as active as I was before but there are potential Misplaced Pages pages which I was working on that I'd like to publish and there are many pages which I previously regularly edited that I would like to continue to update. I have absolutely intention of socking, should I be allowed to return, my contributions are likely to be fairly minimal in the future, I'll probably steer clear of conflicting topics on the whole and concentrate more time on topic areas which take less effort and patience to come into fruition. Tanbircdq (talk) 23:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- Do you have any comments as the blocking admin, Coffee? I'm inclined to grant this request with a set of reasonable restrictions. I would specifically like clarification from you that this block was not an AE action, even though it originated from an AE thread. I assume this is the case because the duration exceeds that which can be applied via discretionary sanctions and I see no evidence it was logged. ~ Rob13 01:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
- @BU Rob13: I can confirm that this was not an AE action. It seems quite reasonable to allow the WP:OFFER to apply here. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Tanbircdq: Could you talk a bit more about what conflict led you to feel the need to sock? I'll offer you an unblock under a set of conditions, but I'd like to ensure the conditions help you return to regular and uncontroversial editing. ~ Rob13 03:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Rob, sorry for the late reply. The conflict was that I added sourced material on a page, to which I was accused of having an agenda, however, despite this continued constructively contributing on the talk page only for the matter to be preemptively taken to ANI where it was shown I had done nothing wrong. After this I felt it untenable, and too disheartened and despondent to contribute on the page but I then regrettably decided to lash out. Tanbircdq (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Coffee and BU Rob13, I can't use talkback, I would appreciate if you'd please response here, thanks. Tanbircdq (talk) 20:30, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- Per our policy on conditional unblocks, I'm willing to unblock you provided you agree to two restrictions. First, you are restricted to a single account indefinitely. This restriction may be lifted or modified by the community or by myself to allow another account to be used for some specific purpose. Note that this restriction bars you from even those use cases of alternate accounts that are typically considered legitimate (e.g. public-use accounts or bot accounts) unless the restriction is lifted or modified. Down the road, I'd be more than willing to entertain reasonable requests to lessen this restriction, if you have a compelling reason to use an alternate account. Second, for the next six months, any uninvolved administrator may re-block you at their discretion for any disruptive activities, up to and including an indefinite block. This more-or-less formalizes the reality for all standard offers; this is a last chance, and there are no warnings left to be had. If you find these restrictions acceptable, ping me and I'll unblock you. ~ Rob13 22:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi BU Rob13, I find these restrictions acceptable, thank you. Tanbircdq (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Per our policy on conditional unblocks, I'm willing to unblock you provided you agree to two restrictions. First, you are restricted to a single account indefinitely. This restriction may be lifted or modified by the community or by myself to allow another account to be used for some specific purpose. Note that this restriction bars you from even those use cases of alternate accounts that are typically considered legitimate (e.g. public-use accounts or bot accounts) unless the restriction is lifted or modified. Down the road, I'd be more than willing to entertain reasonable requests to lessen this restriction, if you have a compelling reason to use an alternate account. Second, for the next six months, any uninvolved administrator may re-block you at their discretion for any disruptive activities, up to and including an indefinite block. This more-or-less formalizes the reality for all standard offers; this is a last chance, and there are no warnings left to be had. If you find these restrictions acceptable, ping me and I'll unblock you. ~ Rob13 22:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Coffee and BU Rob13, I can't use talkback, I would appreciate if you'd please response here, thanks. Tanbircdq (talk) 20:30, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Rob, sorry for the late reply. The conflict was that I added sourced material on a page, to which I was accused of having an agenda, however, despite this continued constructively contributing on the talk page only for the matter to be preemptively taken to ANI where it was shown I had done nothing wrong. After this I felt it untenable, and too disheartened and despondent to contribute on the page but I then regrettably decided to lash out. Tanbircdq (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Tanbircdq: Could you talk a bit more about what conflict led you to feel the need to sock? I'll offer you an unblock under a set of conditions, but I'd like to ensure the conditions help you return to regular and uncontroversial editing. ~ Rob13 03:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
- @BU Rob13: I can confirm that this was not an AE action. It seems quite reasonable to allow the WP:OFFER to apply here. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Religion and ethnicity in infoboxes
A little over a year ago, two RfCs concluded that religion and ethnicity should not be allowed in biographical infoboxes, see:
- Misplaced Pages:Village pump (policy)/Archive 126#RfC: Religion in biographical infoboxes
- Misplaced Pages:Village pump (policy)/Archive 127#RfC: Ethnicity in infoboxes
Please do not add them to infoboxes, as you did in this edit. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Dilly Hussain listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dilly Hussain. Since you had some involvement with the Dilly Hussain redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Copying within Misplaced Pages requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mr. Bean into Mr. Bean (character). While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, Misplaced Pages's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Copyright problem on British Bangladeshi and Munsur Ali
Material you included in the above articles appears to have been copied from copyright web pages elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Also, as a result of this discussion, the Daily Mail is not longer considered a reliable source for this wiki. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Abu Eesa Niamatullah
Hello! I am notifying interested projects and editors that I've listed Abu Eesa Niamatullah for discussion at AfD, and you were listed on the revision history page.
I invite you to contribute to the discussion. Mujaddouda (talk) 23:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Swine/11 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Swine/11. Since you had some involvement with the Swine/11 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 12:17, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- I would comment that if someone makes a nom based on "not in the target article," and you add it to the article while the nom discussion is going on, it might be nice to disclose that fact. UnitedStatesian (talk) 12:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Lord Buckethead 1987.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lord Buckethead 1987.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wcam (talk) 17:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Lord Buckethead 1992.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lord Buckethead 1992.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wcam (talk) 17:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mahi Muqit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mahi Muqit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.retinasurgeon.uk.com/about-mahi/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Misplaced Pages's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 01:50, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Mahi Muqit. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 16:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Nusaiba Mohammed
Hello, Tanbircdq. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nusaiba Mohammed, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Rentier (talk) 22:32, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Excessive linking; ethnicity and religion; and social media external links
In this edit you reverted a number of improvements to article Ahsan Akbar:
- You added numerous links to everyday words used in context, links that are very unlikely to be followed. Readers of the English-language Misplaced Pages are not stupid, they are sufficiently familiar with occupations like "writer", locations like the "United Kingdom", and concepts such as "British" that they do not need to read entire encyclopedia articles about them to understand the main topic, in this case the subject of a biography. WP:OVERLINKING elaborates on what overlinking is and why it is harmful to the encyclopedia.
- There has been overwhelming consensus since RfCs Religion in biographical infoboxes and Ethnicity in infoboxes not to include religion or ethnicity in infoboxes. Your continued addition of them, despite this having been explained to you before, is not constructive. It does not change how the infoboxes are rendered, but does pollute maintenance categories and creates extra work for other editors. Please stop adding them. You are welcome to mention them in the body of the article if relevant and properly sourced.
- Misplaced Pages is not here to promote every social media account of its subjects. Normally only one official link is included. Avoid adding more, particularly when they are prominently linked from the first official webpage. See WP:ELMINOFFICIAL for more information.
Remember that you do not own articles that you create, and should respect the contributions of fellow editors. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:08, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Maya Ali (politician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maya Ali (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Maya Ali (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AllyD (talk) 13:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sami Yusuf - Wherever You Are.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sami Yusuf - Wherever You Are.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Jeremy Corbyn
I have removed undue material from many biographical articles of individuals endorsement of Jeremy Corbyn which you added. Usually, this is because the additions are disproportionate to their real significance, reactive rather than active, and of limited notability. Sometimes, as with Peter Tatchell and George Monbiot, it misrepresents their variable response to Corbyn over the last two years. Philip Cross (talk) 17:19, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Ewan McGregor.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Do not add misleading edit summaries. 4TheWynne 23:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- As you appear to have ignored my message here. Following on from MidnightBlueMan's findings, I don't see what purpose this warning serves over this edit. You reverted my edit and then accused me of making disruptive edits, threatening me with being blocked etc over a "misleading" edit summary which if you used your common sense you could see the edit summary was a mistake but the edit was clearly a good faith minor edit that didn't require being reverted.
- As it clearly says on my talk page template; Do not template me. I am a regular editor and I take your template as seriously rude behavior. I may even report you as a rude editor. Tanbircdq (talk) 10:59, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- It appears that I missed the finer details – I didn't even notice the message, to be fair, and for that I apologise. I was only concerned about the misleading edit summary, which I didn't realise was just a mistake – whenever and wherever I see something like that, I just take action, and in this case, I shouldn't have. 4TheWynne 12:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- No worries, apology accepted, take care. Tanbircdq (talk) 23:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- It appears that I missed the finer details – I didn't even notice the message, to be fair, and for that I apologise. I was only concerned about the misleading edit summary, which I didn't realise was just a mistake – whenever and wherever I see something like that, I just take action, and in this case, I shouldn't have. 4TheWynne 12:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Moved Sanders' endorsement of Corbyn
Hi Tanbircdq, Thank you for your interest in Bernie Sanders. I just wanted to inform you out courtesy that I moved your contribution, regarding endorsement of Jeremy Corbyn under "Political positions" to Political positions of Bernie Sanders#Endorsement of Jeremy Corbyn. I did this because the other topics in "Political positions" in the main article are general in nature, as befits a main article, whereas his endorsement of Corbyn is a very specific stance, more appropriately covered in the latter arcticle. I hope that you will find this acceptable. I'll watch for your comment here, if it's OK with you. If not, let's discuss at Talk:Bernie Sanders. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 21:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi HopsonRoad, thank you for having the courtesy to take the time to explain your removal. I do agree that Sanders' endorsement of Corbyn is quite specific as opposed to some of the other topics in the "political positions" section. However, I do think it's notable enough to have a general summary on main page with specific details elaborated on "political positions" page. I hope that you will agree that this is acceptable, take care. Tanbircdq (talk) 23:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply, here, and your engagement at Bernie Sanders, Tanbircdq. I have a symmetry question for you. If mention of Sanders' endorsement of Corbyn is notable in the Sanders article, is it not also similarly notable in the Jeremy Corbyn article, where I find no mention? As an editor, I would not have considered either the giving or the receiving of the endorsement to be sufficiently notable for a main article, unless it had an effect on the course of events. Sanders, for instance, is making waves in the other political positions mentioned, whereas the first time that I learned of his endorsement of Corbyn was through your contribution. On Corbyn's end, do we suppose that Sanders' endorsement had a positive effect? I recognize from your citations that it made the news in Great Britain. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 13:24, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rakin Niass - The Road Less Travelled.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rakin Niass - The Road Less Travelled.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rakin Niass - Clarity.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rakin Niass - Clarity.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Ahlus-Sunnah wa’l-Jama’ah
Hi-- I've come across Ahlus-Sunnah wa’l-Jama’ah after another editor started adding links to it in various article. The article is a WP:CFORK of Sunni Islam. The phrase is the formal Arabic term for Sunni Islam, and I see nothing in the sources cited there to indicate that it is commonly used in English to refer to some denomination that is distinct from what is normally referred in English-language RSs as Sunni Islam. Please see the citations with quotes in Sunni Islam (whose Arabic counterpart, by the way, is titled أهل السنة والجماعة). I can see that you've put significant work into this article and understand that you may be disappointed by its becoming a redirect. You may want to consider whether some content there is suitable for merging into Sunni Islam. I've considered it myself, but I couldn't find any complementary content there based on solid academic sources. Eperoton (talk) 00:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Aminul Islam Bappi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aminul Islam Bappi is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aminul Islam Bappi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 17:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Abdur Rahman Madani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdur Rahman Madani is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Abdur Rahman Madani (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Moheen 17:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Aladin Ali
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Aladin Ali, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Misplaced Pages:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Edwardx (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Sonata (play)
Hi Tanbirdcdq, regarding this edit, please be aware that the "International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature" is a spammy and likely predatory journal. It's published by "ARC Journals", listed by Beall here. See also Predatory open access publishing. I encourage you to not use such articles and to remove them from Misplaced Pages articles if you see them. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 14:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Scottish motivational speakers
A tag has been placed on Category:Scottish motivational speakers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 01:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Dennis Skinner: Nature of the Beast
An article that you have been involved in editing—Dennis Skinner: Nature of the Beast—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. I would suggest keeping your article as the main one, copying any missing information from Nature of the Beast (Film) before turning it into a redirect to your article. Thank you. Certes (talk) 00:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Tanbircdq. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Mahi Muqit) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Mahi Muqit, Tanbircdq!
Misplaced Pages editor Triptropic just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice work on the article on Mahi Muqit. Thank you for your contribution.
To reply, leave a comment on Triptropic's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Triptropic (talk) 22:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Category:Indian-American films
Hi
I hope you are the right person for this.
I was looking at Category:Indian-American films on Misplaced Pages - it would be really good if you could update as it's 3 years old.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.246.119 (talk) 20:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Done. 
Nomination of Nazia Ali for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nazia Ali is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nazia Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 20:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror
Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:57, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Iftekhar Ahmed for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iftekhar Ahmed is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Iftekhar Ahmed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yunshui 水 15:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Emdad Rahman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emdad Rahman is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Emdad Rahman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 07:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Shoebox (musical)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Shoebox (musical), Tanbircdq!
Misplaced Pages editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Misplaced Pages takes copyright violation very seriously. You must not copy/paste copyrighted information into articles.
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:45, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Positive Money
Thanks for finding some valid content for this article. One thing of concern, however. The bit about Dyson founded it after reading a book is WP:UNDUE. It might belong in Dyson's biography if he says that this was a key moment in his intellectual or political development, but it is not of encyclopedic interest in an article about the organization. Every organization, after all, is founded by individuals acting out of knowledge and belief. It is WP:SYNTH to associate the author of a published book with Dyson or with Positive Money in this way. If the author has made any statements about Positive Money, that would be a different matter and those statements might be due weight in the Positive Money article. Please remove this bit about the book that you have just re-instated. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 23:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for your message about your on about whether the origins of how the organisation was founded should be included on the article. However, as you can clearly see from the diff that I have not "re-instated" this content and the last revision shows this content was already in the article.
- If you have concerns about this then I suggest that you take this to the talk page rather than canvassing me directly. Thanks. Tanbircdq (talk) 11:49, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Category:Leaders of Tower Hamlets First has been nominated for discussion
Category:Leaders of Tower Hamlets First, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 11:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Category:Leaders of People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets has been nominated for discussion
Category:Leaders of People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 11:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Category:Tower Hamlets Independent Group councillors has been nominated for discussion
Category:Tower Hamlets Independent Group councillors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 11:39, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Category:Aspire (political party) councillors has been nominated for discussion
Category:Aspire (political party) councillors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 11:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Category:Yusuf Islam albums has been nominated for discussion
Category:Yusuf Islam albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:54, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Hoult
Hey, could you talk back at the article's talk page? Thank you. VedantTalk 20:04, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Anwara Ali
The article Anwara Ali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Councillors or mayoral *candidates* are not notable under WP:NPOL. Rest of the article is minor stuff. The "British Bangladeshi Who's Who" is not a reliable source as people submit their own biographies.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bondegezou (talk) 09:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Question
Hi, im Tiberius. I saw one of your edits on the article Jeremy Corbyn and thought i'd check out your user-page. According to your page you are a Bangladeshi socialist, what i want to ask about is wether you are a member/affiliate/supporter of any particular political party? Tiberius Jarsve (talk) 18:05, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, no I'm not a member, affiliate or supporter of any political party in Bangladesh. Tanbircdq (talk) 12:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Thatcher
Hi. Just look at the infobox. Where does the title "Prime Minister of the United Kingdom" appear? Nowhere, that's where. An insane outcome. That's why I've reverted your edit twice. -- Jack of Oz 22:21, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
RFC On new article title, Antisemitism in the Labour Party
Their is currently a RFC discussion on renaming the article: "Alleged Antisemitism in the Labour Party"
If you care to respond, is open for discussion and opinions, thanks C. W. Gilmore (talk) 20:30, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Positive Money
I suggest you read the instructions and conditions for removing the notability tag. You are joining an edit war that's been waged over an extended period by Single Purpose Accounts and sockpuppets. What is the array of independent, reliable sources written directly about this organization that you believe establishes notability beyond all doubt? If you have such references, please add them and their associated content to the article. If not, as the instructions say, raise your concerns on talk but do not remove - or in this case please undo your removal - of the template. The purpose of the template is to attract editors to add valid well-sourced content to the article, and premature removal thwarts that objective. SPECIFICO talk 21:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- "beyond all doubt"? This is not a court of law. This is Misplaced Pages. You are straining too hard to impose your beliefs. Reissgo (talk) 15:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 ~ Rob13 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018
- Talk:Labour Party (UK)#Further_information:_Antisemitism_in_the_Labour_Party please have a read of the talk page to understand the situation. Alssa1 (talk) 18:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
help
hi, I need help to post a pic with an article. for som e reason it's not working. it keep referring me to wiki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abongsristy (talk • contribs) 02:21, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Abongsristy, you can upload images by following the steps on Misplaced Pages:File Upload Wizard. Thanks. Tanbircdq (talk) 16:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Jewish Voice for Labour
You created a page Jewish Voice for Labour. Please could you re-examine it. There are editors trying to add partisan quotes about members of JVC. The page needs looking at by a rather more objective editor. Garageland66 (talk) 08:43, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
BLP issues on British politics articles arbitration case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/BLP issues on British politics articles. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/BLP issues on British politics articles/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 22, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/BLP issues on British politics articles/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
1RR violation
This is your first revert (although partial). This is your second revert in less than 24 hours. Revert yourself or I'll report you to AE.--יניב הורון (Yaniv) (talk) 00:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Child sexual abuse in the United Kingdom
As a trusted and impartial editor, I would like to ask you to take a look at this page Child sexual abuse in the United Kingdom. There are editors on this page who seem to have an agenda which is to place responsibility for most child abuse in the United Kingdom on men of Asian/Muslim identity. Garageland66 (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- I object strongly to your allegation that I have a racist agenda and insist that you withdraw it. Perhaps if you learned how to add material to an article without cherry picking quotes and using synthesis to make sources say what you want them to say rather than what they actually say, we'd all be getting along much more pleasantly. Neil S. Walker (talk) 10:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Snowded: Ping also. Neil S. Walker (talk) 11:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- I've accused no one of having a racist agenda. However, I have been falsely accused of cherry picking. Try not to invent accusations and try to stay cool.Garageland66 (talk) 18:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Garageland66:Learn to use the talk page and stop making accusations, not to mention taking your own advice. Also be aware that lobbying individual editors when you are in dispute on another article is frowned on and with your block history I would steer clear of it -----Snowded 11:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- Garageland66, I'm sure you meant well but it's best not to WP:CANVAS other editors on talk pages in this way but better to use three pings with a neutral statement then I'm sure everyone will appreciate that you have made efforts at the right place.
- @Garageland66:Learn to use the talk page and stop making accusations, not to mention taking your own advice. Also be aware that lobbying individual editors when you are in dispute on another article is frowned on and with your block history I would steer clear of it -----Snowded 11:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- I've accused no one of having a racist agenda. However, I have been falsely accused of cherry picking. Try not to invent accusations and try to stay cool.Garageland66 (talk) 18:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Neil S Walker, I don't believe that your name was mentioned here.
- Snowded, please don't bring up editors previous block history. Another editors was warned not to do this at ANI recently.
- Finally, I'd appreciate if you'd all please keep your disputes off my talk page before I have no option but making you all victims of WP:Whacking with a wet trout. Happy editing people, thank you, :-). Tanbircdq (talk) 13:03, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/BLP issues on British politics articles
Please take note of the following when presenting evidence:
 | Information for participants:
|
In particular,
- The Arbitration Committee reminds participating editors that any off-wiki information should be sent privately to arbcom-l
lists.wikimedia.org rather than being posted publicly on case pages. Arbitration clerks have been instructed to remove and revision delete any material related to off-wiki information from case pages.
Thanks! ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 23:06, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Pilgrim State (book)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Pilgrim State (book) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2008/apr/13/women.mentalhealth. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Misplaced Pages's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:36, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:37, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Nina Ruth Davis Salaman
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nina Ruth Davis Salaman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/salaman-nina-ruth-davis. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Misplaced Pages's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:39, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
File:The Lynching.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Misplaced Pages non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Misplaced Pages talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
File:What It Feels Like To Be Me.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Misplaced Pages non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Misplaced Pages talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Pilgrim State.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pilgrim State.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Alert
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
All conflict articles under WP:1RR you have broken it on Criticism of the Israeli government Shrike (talk) 05:57, 5 July 2018 (UTC)July 2018
Your recent editing history at Deepika Padukone shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:24, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Jilani Chowdhury
The article Jilani Chowdhury has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Local politician only: fails WP:NPOL. Most citations are just routine coverage by local papers: fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bondegezou (talk) 23:07, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (What It Feels Like To Be Me) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating What It Feels Like To Be Me, Tanbircdq!
Misplaced Pages editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
An interesting and well-written article.
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Category:Mumzy Stranger has been nominated for discussion
Category:Mumzy Stranger, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 14:38, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:51, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to this wiki in violation of our copyright policy and copyright law. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:54, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Tanbircdq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I acknowledge that I've been blocked for copyright violations. I realise that I've been careless and/or complacent which had led to my editing falling short at times. I've tried to ensure that my general contributions are in good faith and it was not my intention to make these violations. However, I've read through WP:COPYVIO and WP:PARAPHRASE in detail and made myself familiar with the rules and guidelines. I make a resolution to be more careful in future and I would like to request to be unblocked.
Decline reason:
Besides the copyright violations, you seem to have a history of sock puppetry. You were given a last chance unblock in 2017 under the condition that you cease all use of alternate accounts, even legitimate ones. As far as I can tell, you've kept to that, but you've been editing while logged out, presumably to evade scrutiny. This should be addressed in any future unblock requests. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Tanbircdq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I've not operated any other accounts during my previous block or since and as far as I'm aware I've not been editing while logged out either. Tanbircdq (talk) 13:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I've not operated any other accounts during my previous block or since and as far as I'm aware I've not been editing while logged out either. ] (]) 13:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I've not operated any other accounts during my previous block or since and as far as I'm aware I've not been editing while logged out either. ] (]) 13:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I've not operated any other accounts during my previous block or since and as far as I'm aware I've not been editing while logged out either. ] (]) 13:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Speedy deletion nomination of Nina Ruth Davis Salaman
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nina Ruth Davis Salaman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/salaman-nina-ruth-davis. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Misplaced Pages's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
I also found copyright violations in Pilgrim State (book), Tulip Siddiq, Jackie Walker (activist), BAME Labour. I have nominated International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of antisemitism for deletion as a copyright violation, because the source webpage is released under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 UK: England & Wales (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 UK) license, which is not a compatible license. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Daniel Draper (filmmaker)
The article Daniel Draper (filmmaker) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
as the person this page is based on, I do not wish to have such information about myself on Misplaced Pages
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Likewise, the article on his film Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists. – Fayenatic London 14:48, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art/38580/Still+Ragged+++film+celebrates+100+years+of+a+working+class+classic https://www.blazingminds.co.uk/new-film-labour-politician-dennis-skinner/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Misplaced Pages's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Misplaced Pages, then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists, in your email. See Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists. See Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Misplaced Pages article layout. For more information on Misplaced Pages's policies, see Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:34, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
CCI Notice
Hello, Tanbircdq. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Misplaced Pages in relation to Misplaced Pages's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. If nothing else, this means that you will no longer be notified if other articles are found where you seem to have added copyright material. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:26, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sarah Begum
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sarah Begum, requesting that it be deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Misplaced Pages:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.specialistspeakers.com/?p=8014. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Atlantic306 (talk) 16:48, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Category: