Misplaced Pages

Talk:Giovanni Fornasini: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:11, 25 August 2018 editNarky Blert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers417,447 edits GA nomination← Previous edit Revision as of 21:33, 27 August 2018 edit undoFarang Rak Tham (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,076 edits adding GAR noteNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GA nominee|01:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)|nominator=] (])|page=1|subtopic=Philosophy and religion|status=|note=}} {{GA nominee|01:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)|nominator=] (])|page=1|subtopic=Philosophy and religion|status=|note=Most sources are in Italian.}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= {{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WP Biography |living=no |listas=Fornasini, Giovanni |class=B}} {{WP Biography |living=no |listas=Fornasini, Giovanni |class=B}}

Revision as of 21:33, 27 August 2018

Giovanni Fornasini is currently a Philosophy and religion good article nominee. Nominated by Narky Blert (talk) at 01:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Note: Most sources are in Italian.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconCatholicism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconGiovanni Fornasini is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Catholicism task list:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconItaly Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article contains a translation of Giovanni Fornasini from it.wikipedia.

Comment

Non sono cattolico; ero anglicano; sono ateo. Ma, penso di poter vedere un brav'uomo quando ne vedo uno. RIP don Fornasini, martire e santo. Narky Blert (talk) 22:57, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

GA nomination

Comments by creator and nom:

  1. I wouldn't usually try to claim any credit for a translated article, but this one is massively enlarged and much better referenced than the Italian original.
  2. The sources are fragmentary, and are a mess. I am putting this up for WP:GA partly as a model of how to deal with sources like that in an encyclopedic manner: point out the problems, tell the readers where to go look. Narky Blert (talk) 01:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Categories: