| Revision as of 02:36, 6 November 2006 editXdenizen (talk | contribs)Rollbackers7,418 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:12, 6 November 2006 edit undoRoyalguard11 (talk | contribs)13,192 edits →[]: DeleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. ] 01:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom. ] 01:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. ] 02:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom. ] 02:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' Non-notable neologism. -]<small>(]·]·])</small> 04:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:12, 6 November 2006
Ecopath
Neologisms shouldn't have articles based on them. The term is fictitious and doesn't have a source (i.e. no fictional character is ever described in context as being an "ecopath". I believe the term was invented to parrallel technopath, but regardless, it's all OR/a user's own invention. ~Zythe 13:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as unsourced. Google suggests this is a term which does not have any standard definition—I get many hits for a certain software, some for the path of fish in the sea, etc. Kavadi carrier 13:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 01:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Xdenizen 02:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable neologism. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 04:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC)