| Revision as of 01:11, 6 November 2006 editApplePie3 (talk | contribs)5 edits Vandal Bot Code← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:21, 6 November 2006 edit undoWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 3 sections to User talk:Tawker/Nov06Next edit → | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| I did not have time to add the hangon tag to this page after it was marked. I had made links from the ] page (the reference was there, I just added link capability. I was also referenced under [[List of high schools in Mississippi | I did not have time to add the hangon tag to this page after it was marked. I had made links from the ] page (the reference was there, I just added link capability. I was also referenced under [[List of high schools in Mississippi | ||
| ]]. Again I just added the link ability. I seem to remember two links being a qualifying parameter. I also have about 200 words of text to be added. There are several additional schools in the same catagory listed on Misplaced Pages indluding ], ], ] and several others. | ]]. Again I just added the link ability. I seem to remember two links being a qualifying parameter. I also have about 200 words of text to be added. There are several additional schools in the same catagory listed on Misplaced Pages indluding ], ], ] and several others. | ||
| ==How AntiVandalBot recognizes vandalism== | |||
| Hello. I've been using Misplaced Pages for some time now and I've noticed a lot of difference bots in my time but I was wondering how AVB can tell the difference between regular edits and blatant vandalism. I have no idea how bots function and have no intention of creating a bot in the future, but I'm just curious how he can tell the difference betwen the two. Thanks. | |||
| P.S. - Please reply here and congradulations on all of the awards, your adminship, and all of your hard work here at Misplaced Pages. Keep it up! // ]]]] 02:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : I did not program the bots, but have been watching and interacting with them for quite a while. I was also given a summary of the then-list of criteria quite a few months back. Basically the bot(s) watch all edits, and parse every one through a set of checks. If the bot matches any of the current criteria, and does not meet any of a number of white-listing criteria, then it is considered a vandalism, and is handled as such. Amoung the white-listing is a list of all admins. The bots are not supposed to revert admins in general. As for the vandalism criteria, I'd rather not say. In general we do not want the information publically out there. But I will give one common example. Page blanking. Blank out a page, and the bot is very likely to flag the edit as vandalism. In general, watch the things that the bot reverts. Each revert triggered at least one vandalism criteria. So look at a revert, at what was done and what was reverted, and think about what it is about that specific edit that the bot could have triggered on. - ] 14:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Pretty much, it's now a bot, we moved it to the toolserver and it speeds up things a fair bit. Right now it checks (or is supposed to) all IP edits, all "new" account edits and thats about it. Pretty much it's blatantly obvious things (etc) that get the vandalism, there are a few other things which I don't really want to tip off the vandals in a public channel. Feel free to email me though :) -- ] 18:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Fair enough. I can see why you'd want to have a private chat when it comes to these kind of things ^_^. I'll be using my mom's e-mail address (unless I make my own) but I won't be able to get to you until the weekend. Thanks. // ]]]] 02:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Are you a bot - response == | |||
| How are you able to test AVB? I thought that it finds vandalism in a semi-random manner since it can't check every single article at once. Anyway the only reason I caught it fast was because I was repeatedly checking my watchlist back then. ] 19:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Get AntiVandalBot working again. Now. == | == Get AntiVandalBot working again. Now. == | ||
| Line 69: | Line 56: | ||
| ::Someone blocked toolserver. It happens once in a while. Oh, Tawker: . <b><i><font color="#FF00FF">~Kylu (]|]) </font></i></b> 05:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | ::Someone blocked toolserver. It happens once in a while. Oh, Tawker: . <b><i><font color="#FF00FF">~Kylu (]|]) </font></i></b> 05:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Barnstar == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your hardwork and dedication to making Misplaced Pages a better place. I, ], award you this Original Barnstar. Good job! :-) ] 04:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| Your work with your bot is incredible. | |||
| ] 04:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Check other modifications by same user with bot == | == Check other modifications by same user with bot == | ||
Revision as of 15:21, 6 November 2006
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tawker/Dec06. Sections without timestamps are not archived |
Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives
Vandalism??
What vandalism? How dare you accuse me of vandalism! Show me the vandalism! 71.213.73.51 10:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
help!
I accidentally blanked half the Robin Hood article. I know you fixed it when I did this to the Star Wars article. Can you tell me how to fix it? Thank you.
TS Edit Test
re: Unicornscan article deletion
I noticed that you have deleted the Unicornscan. Could you please point me to some justification of this?
Continuing the discussion...
On your talk page this time. You stated: "your current vote likely will confuse the hell out of a lot of users..." How many users who voted support actually understand the C# code TawkerBotTorA is written in ? Jcam
Retrieval
Would it be possible to retrieve the article somehow? I couldn't figure that out from the deletion history. Thanks
no offence
Are you a wiki freak???!?!? Your making me scared!
NO OFENCE!
Vandalbot mistake
Hello! The vandalbot tagged me as a vandal by mistake; I think that it may be because I forgot to sign a comment on WP:AIV but other than that I am pretty sure that I am not a vandal! (aeropagitica) 20:45, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Benton Academy
Sorry - I'll fix according to your comments.
Why was this deleted???
I did not have time to add the hangon tag to this page after it was marked. I had made links from the Benton, Mississippi page (the reference was there, I just added link capability. I was also referenced under [[List of high schools in Mississippi ]]. Again I just added the link ability. I seem to remember two links being a qualifying parameter. I also have about 200 words of text to be added. There are several additional schools in the same catagory listed on Misplaced Pages indluding Trinity Episcopal Day School, Southaven High School, Jim Hill High School and several others.
Get AntiVandalBot working again. Now.
Yes, even if it means taking it off the toolserver and going back to the old way of doing things. Vandals are blanking pages left, right and centre – Gurch 19:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the speedy response – Gurch 19:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Someone blocked toolserver. It happens once in a while. Oh, Tawker: this edit's for you.. ~Kylu (u|t) 05:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Check other modifications by same user with bot
Is there any way you could do this? Often, a user who had a change reverted by the bot also performed many other vandalizations. If the bot could check through the user's edits, it would help clear out vandalism even faster.
Thank you for supporting my RfA
|
Thank you for your support in my RfA, which passed with a final tally of (56/0/2). It was great to see so much kind support from such competent editors and administrators as commented on my RfA.
I know I have much reading to do before I'll feel comfortable enough to use some of the more powerful admin tools, so I'll get right to it.
|
WP:BRFA request
Hi - I've left a message here regarding a very short trial I ran for the pluralisation system. Thanks, Martinp23 20:45, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Responding
Hi Tawker. Here are the templates I use for the warnings:
==Editing Concerns==
#{{subst:test1}} ~~~~
#{{subst:test2}} ~~~~
#{{subst:test3}} ~~~~
#{{subst:test4}} ~~~~
Each has text and symbols, based on common use for many RC patrollers. Thanks for considering my suggestion. Kukini 02:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
The thing is we don't want to give the standard warnings - they sound way too much like a human is doing it - I'm well aware of test1-4, and of course the much more useful test5 :) - I think I'll work on another custom warning -- Tawker 04:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you...
...for your support of my recent RfA. I have always been a fan of your work as a Wikiepedian, so I especially honored by your vote of confidence. If I can be of any use to you, just drop me a line. BTW, congrats on getting to live in the Couv, one of the most beautiful cities on earth. We should all be so lucky. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 19:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Re: LOL
Well, I did unblock myself, which I guess is ok in this situation. It is pretty funny, and I'm glad that I'm not the only one who does that either. Strange things can happen while trying to keep up with all the vandalism. Am I the only one who feels like there is more vandalism than usual today? And I am reverting only the edits of the users that AntiVandalBot catches. Academic Challenger 22:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
How to get a regular vandal blocked
I am writing about user 82.94.28.98 who has had repeated warnings about vandalism. Recently (s)he has been very busy vandalizing the article on "coolies". I don't know how to contact an administrator to deal with this person. Would you please help me with this problem? Many thanks, John Hill 22:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Monitor pages
Hey Tawker, remember how on your RfA you responded to my comments almost instantly, then told me you have a bot monitoring that page? Do you still happen to have a copy of that bot? Cheers. +Hexagon1 04:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
small favor
I was wondering of you could help me out with getting votes for expanding an article I started a while back. My old US Australia relations article is currently being considered for expansion by the Misplaced Pages:Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight. To vote, go here and scroll to the bottom.
Thanks! Sharkface217 05:09, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
November Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
Vandal Bot Code
Hi Tawker, I help administer a wiki and am interested in this AntiVandalBot. Is it possible to make a Vandal Bot that doesnt rely us on installing it on Unix? For example, it would be nice it works as a MediaWiki extension. Any pointers on that? Thank. --ApplePie3 01:11, 6 November 2006 (UTC)