Revision as of 12:08, 10 October 2018 editVif12vf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users80,106 edits →IdeologyTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit |
Revision as of 13:38, 10 October 2018 edit undoHapHaxion (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers70,975 edits →Ideology: responseTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → |
Line 11: |
Line 11: |
|
== Ideology == |
|
== Ideology == |
|
|
|
|
|
The source listed claiming the organization is conservative/pro-business checks out, but I found another source () claiming almost the opposite (that the organization is more left-wing or socialist-esque). What should be done? ] <sub>(] / ])</sub> 11:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC) |
|
The source listed claiming the organization is conservative/pro-business checks out, but I found another source<ref>{{cite web|title=Professional Practices of Human Resource Management in Hong Kong|isbn=9789622090606|date=2009|publisher=Hong Kong University Press|page=203|last1=Tsui|first1=Anna P.Y.|last2=Lai|first2=K.T.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3Q_KwxKKnIAC&pg=PA203&lpg=PA203&dq=Hong+Kong+Federation+of+Trade+Unions+ideology&source=bl&ots=v9R6kyCizT&sig=WdMSsMcCU-IHXhNDhkejn8Z0wVM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9_tS45_vdAhWGneAKHUGBDggQ6AEwBHoECAMQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Hong%20Kong%20Federation%20of%20Trade%20Unions%22%20ideology&f=false}}</ref> claiming almost the opposite (that the organization is more left-wing or socialist-esque). What should be done? ] <sub>(] / ])</sub> 11:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The policy-section kinda backs a more left-wing position. However it is completely possible they might be socially conservative and economically socialist or social democratic! ] (]) 12:08, 10 October 2018 (UTC) |
|
:The policy-section kinda backs a more left-wing position. However it is completely possible they might be socially conservative and economically socialist or social democratic! ] (]) 12:08, 10 October 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
::That's what I originally thought, then I looked up the first source, and saw the claim that the organization was pro-business, which at least in my mind, tends to rule out left-leaning positions. You rarely see even social-democratic parties described as pro-business unless they espouse more ] policies. The sources seem to be at-odds with one another. ] <sub>(] / ])</sub> 13:38, 10 October 2018 (UTC) |
The source listed claiming the organization is conservative/pro-business checks out, but I found another source claiming almost the opposite (that the organization is more left-wing or socialist-esque). What should be done? HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 11:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)