Revision as of 19:43, 7 November 2006 editAshadeofgrey (talk | contribs)8,966 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Revision as of 21:17, 7 November 2006 edit undoDream out loud (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers23,803 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
== NYCS navbox == |
|
|
|
|
|
First, the navbox is maintained by ]. I would go there first, as me and ] are part of the project. As me and him have reverted it multiple times, I would ask that you go to the ] talk page and discuss the issue there. I will not guarantee that people will be so inclined by it. --] <small>( ] | ])</small> 13:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
No offense, but there is no need to use hex codes. Even ] disagrees with using them. It makes the whole thing more bloated than it already is. I have reverted it again, so please go to the ] talk page and discuss your matters there. Thank you for your cooperation. --] <small>( ] | ])</small> 14:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
One of the central tenets of Misplaced Pages is: ]. In other words, even when we disagree with someone, we should assume that they truly have the best interests of the encyclopedia at heart. |
|
|
|
|
|
I am beginning to wonder if the normal good-faith assumption applies to you. You added hex codes to the {{tl|NYCS navbox}} article on the subways project talk page. Two people objected and reverted your edits; nobody agreed. |
|
|
|
|
|
Now I see that you simply went ahead and added them again anyway. This is not good-faith behavior and may be interpreted as vandalism. You obviously have considerable o the project. I suggest, however, that you try to play as part of a team, instead of unilaterally making changes that are not supported by the community. --] <small>( ] | ])</small> 19:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
I don't think that move was good; check the ].--] 19:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC) |
|