Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dream out loud/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Dream out loud Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:43, 7 November 2006 editAshadeofgrey (talk | contribs)8,966 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 21:17, 7 November 2006 edit undoDream out loud (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers23,803 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== NYCS navbox ==

First, the navbox is maintained by ]. I would go there first, as me and ] are part of the project. As me and him have reverted it multiple times, I would ask that you go to the ] talk page and discuss the issue there. I will not guarantee that people will be so inclined by it. --]&nbsp;<small>( ]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;])</small> 13:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

No offense, but there is no need to use hex codes. Even ] disagrees with using them. It makes the whole thing more bloated than it already is. I have reverted it again, so please go to the ] talk page and discuss your matters there. Thank you for your cooperation. --]&nbsp;<small>( ]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;])</small> 14:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

One of the central tenets of Misplaced Pages is: ]. In other words, even when we disagree with someone, we should assume that they truly have the best interests of the encyclopedia at heart.

I am beginning to wonder if the normal good-faith assumption applies to you. You added hex codes to the {{tl|NYCS navbox}} article on the subways project talk page. Two people objected and reverted your edits; nobody agreed.

Now I see that you simply went ahead and added them again anyway. This is not good-faith behavior and may be interpreted as vandalism. You obviously have considerable o the project. I suggest, however, that you try to play as part of a team, instead of unilaterally making changes that are not supported by the community. --]&nbsp;<small>( ]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;])</small> 19:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==
I don't think that move was good; check the ].--] 19:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:17, 7 November 2006