Talk:Pneumonia: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:38, 10 October 2018 editSporkBot (talk \| contribs)Bots1,244,917 editsm Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:16, 15 October 2018 edit undoCarloFirst (talk \| contribs)8 edits →Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2018: new sectionNext edit →
Line 59:		Line 59:
	::Seems like the trials are ongoing https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883928 ] (] · ] · ]) 19:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)		::Seems like the trials are ongoing https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883928 ] (] · ] · ]) 19:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
	:::This review says "More research is needed on the implementation, cost and effectiveness of CPAP in the management of pneumonia and in neonatal care in developing countries" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24165032 ] (] · ] · ]) 19:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)		:::This review says "More research is needed on the implementation, cost and effectiveness of CPAP in the management of pneumonia and in neonatal care in developing countries" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24165032 ] (] · ] · ]) 19:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

			== Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2018 ==

			{{edit semi-protected\|Pneumonia\|answered=no}}
			We would like to add Cochrane Evidence


			Review : oral care for Nursing home acquired pneumoria 2018

			Conclusion : there is no evidence that one approach to oral care is better than the other one prevening nursing home acquired pneumonia

			There is no high quality evidence about the topic.

			Liu, Chang; Cao, Yubin; Lin, Jie; Ng, Linda; Needleman, Ian; Walsh, Tanya; Li, Chunjie (2018). "Oral care measures for preventing nursing home‐acquired pneumonia". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (9). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012416.pub2. ISSN 1465-1858.


			```` ] (]) 14:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:16, 15 October 2018

Pneumonia is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

Pneumonia has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 4, 2005.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 19, 2005	Peer review	Reviewed
November 9, 2005	Peer review	Reviewed
November 19, 2005	Featured article candidate	Promoted
August 17, 2009	Featured article review	Demoted
November 25, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

Ideal sources for Misplaced Pages's health content are defined in the guideline Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Pneumonia.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Template:Vital article

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Medicine: Translation / Pulmonology Top‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Translation task force (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article was selected on the Medicine portal as one of Misplaced Pages's best articles related to Medicine.
	This article is currently the Medicine Collaboration of the Month.

Template:V0.5

Template:WP1.0

This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Misplaced Pages rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:

Julie A McDougal (2007), Diseases and Disorders, Marshall Cavendish

Additional comments
Extensive copy and pastes of large sections of Misplaced Pages without appropriate attribution or release under the appropriate license.

Archive 1

Edit Request - Cost

Mohamad Christi created a cost-effective invention to help children with pneumonia in low-income countries. It works similarly to a bubble-cPAP, however, it is made out of a simple shampoo bottle filled with water and some tubing attached. This simple invention cut the price of treatment by approximately 90% which helped parents in low-income countries who could not afford bubble-cPAP treatment for their children with pneumonia.

Shelby.a14 (talk) 18:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Would need a recommendation by say WHO. Also do we have a good ref to support bubble CPAP in pneumonia?

Seems like the trials are ongoing https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883928 Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

This review says "More research is needed on the implementation, cost and effectiveness of CPAP in the management of pneumonia and in neonatal care in developing countries" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24165032 Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2018

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Pneumonia. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

We would like to add Cochrane Evidence

Review : oral care for Nursing home acquired pneumoria 2018

Conclusion : there is no evidence that one approach to oral care is better than the other one prevening nursing home acquired pneumonia

There is no high quality evidence about the topic.

Liu, Chang; Cao, Yubin; Lin, Jie; Ng, Linda; Needleman, Ian; Walsh, Tanya; Li, Chunjie (2018). "Oral care measures for preventing nursing home‐acquired pneumonia". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (9). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012416.pub2. ISSN 1465-1858.

```` CarloFirst (talk) 14:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

"Health Care". The Economist. Retrieved 11 September 2018.

Categories: